Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I didn't see the need for a new topic, so I'll ask here.

I've determined my MP meter is off -2/3 compared to my Sekonic 758 and my Q2. Any point in sending it back to the mothership for repair? Should I just compensate?

Brand new batteries
Cleaned contacts
Cycled the ISO dial a few times
Made sure the ISO dial is set correctly on 400
It's now set to 250 so the MP matches the Sekonic and Q2
Checked on an exterior wall (that is really, really close to mid-gray) on a bright cloudy day

Link to post
Share on other sites

Take the battery out of the MP and use the Sekonic? ;)

Kidding.  Is the camera new?  If so, I'd probably send it back.  If it's an older camera and the meter has become inaccurate over time, then I'd probably compensate until the camera needs a full CLA, then I'd have the meter repaired.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, logan2z said:

Take the battery out of the MP and use the Sekonic? ;)

Kidding.  Is the camera new?  If so, I'd probably send it back.  If it's an older camera and the meter has become inaccurate over time, then I'd probably compensate until the camera needs a full CLA, then I'd have the meter repaired.  

I've got my M-A to use with the Sekonic. :)

It's new(ish) from last summer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, malligator said:

I didn't see the need for a new topic, so I'll ask here.

I've determined my MP meter is off -2/3 compared to my Sekonic 758 and my Q2. Any point in sending it back to the mothership for repair? Should I just compensate?

Brand new batteries
Cleaned contacts
Cycled the ISO dial a few times
Made sure the ISO dial is set correctly on 400
It's now set to 250 so the MP matches the Sekonic and Q2
Checked on an exterior wall (that is really, really close to mid-gray) on a bright cloudy day

If it’s a new camera, send it back. Not acceptable for a $5000 camera.

Seriously, a light meter in an MP is not complicated… in fact analog cameras are not too complicated either especially compared to todays technology, yet we see SO many problems with the new M6 reissued and MP and M11… the M11 is so basic compared to canon’s R5 or the newer cameras from Fuji and Sony.
 

I don’t even know why I still buy from this brand. Probably mainly because of the unique user experience it carries, which apparently now includes the stress and loss of time dealing with defective cameras and zero to poor customer service.

Edited by 69xchange
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This is my first posting so don't bash me too much. I had a Leica M3 15 years ago but it was stolen and I really didn't know how to take pictures with it anyway. So I went to Fuji digital and have that. But a year ago my uncle passed away and willed me a MP. I have to say that i like this camera as i didn't even look at it until a week ago when i remembered i have it. I haven't even sent away one roll to be developed yet as i am still working on it but i am impressed by how easy this camera is to use when i remember what my M3 was like to use because this camera has a light meter. Leica did a good job in making this camera as the light meter really makes it easy for me as a novice to take these images. I don't know what they will turn out like as they are just shots around the house but that light meter is something i wish i had on my M3 and i might have missed it more. But when it was stolen and i went to the fuji digital cameras i liked those since digital seems to do everything. But I will report back when i get this  roll developed. who knows as they might be all junk but i have a feeling that they are going to be ok. 

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

21 hours ago, malligator said:

I didn't see the need for a new topic, so I'll ask here.

I've determined my MP meter is off -2/3 compared to my Sekonic 758 and my Q2. Any point in sending it back to the mothership for repair? Should I just compensate?

Brand new batteries
Cleaned contacts
Cycled the ISO dial a few times
Made sure the ISO dial is set correctly on 400
It's now set to 250 so the MP matches the Sekonic and Q2
Checked on an exterior wall (that is really, really close to mid-gray) on a bright cloudy day

I may walk this back. We had some sunshine today (Spring is on the way!) so I did some more testing with a gray card. It seems the meter is pretty well in agreement with my Sekonic and Q2 in the middle of the range (EV10) and strays a little toward the edges. At EV5 and below it's at its worst (-2/3), but still reasonably accurate. It's a little off the other way at EV15 (1/3 or so). I'll just take that into account and compensate when needed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pedro15 said:

This is my first posting so don't bash me too much. I had a Leica M3 15 years ago but it was stolen and I really didn't know how to take pictures with it anyway. So I went to Fuji digital and have that. But a year ago my uncle passed away and willed me a MP. I have to say that i like this camera as i didn't even look at it until a week ago when i remembered i have it. I haven't even sent away one roll to be developed yet as i am still working on it but i am impressed by how easy this camera is to use when i remember what my M3 was like to use because this camera has a light meter. Leica did a good job in making this camera as the light meter really makes it easy for me as a novice to take these images. I don't know what they will turn out like as they are just shots around the house but that light meter is something i wish i had on my M3 and i might have missed it more. But when it was stolen and i went to the fuji digital cameras i liked those since digital seems to do everything. But I will report back when i get this  roll developed. who knows as they might be all junk but i have a feeling that they are going to be ok. 

Hello pedro,

Welcome to the Forum.

It would be nice if you would write about how your roll of film turns out.

Best Regards,

Michael

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, 69xchange said:

If it’s a new camera, send it back. Not acceptable for a $5000 camera.

Seriously, a light meter in an MP is not complicated… in fact analog cameras are not too complicated either especially compared to todays technology, yet we see SO many problems with the new M6 reissued and MP and M11… the M11 is so basic compared to canon’s R5 or the newer cameras from Fuji and Sony.
 

I don’t even know why I still buy from this brand. Probably mainly because of the unique user experience it carries, which apparently now includes the stress and loss of time dealing with defective cameras and zero to poor customer service.

I have yet to talk to a customer support individual. Not joking, 35 phone calls, three emails, talked to every person I could in New Jersey that picked up the phone. I am ok with slower repair times since its humans etc and the time it takes to get it right. 9k on a camera and zero expectation by Leica to pick up the phone when you call is outrageous. 

Frustrated to say the least. 

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, rustyrus said:

I have yet to talk to a customer support individual. Not joking, 35 phone calls, three emails, talked to every person I could in New Jersey that picked up the phone. I am ok with slower repair times since its humans etc and the time it takes to get it right. 9k on a camera and zero expectation by Leica to pick up the phone when you call is outrageous. 

Frustrated to say the least. 

Contact Leica HQ in Germany. Tell them your bad experience with NJ Leica and they may sort it out. I had to do the same thing last year. Luckily it worked for me and NJ had no choice but to answer my emails.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

After a bad experience with scratched film on a new M-A and Leica CLAed M4-P, I decided to try again. Fingers crossed. Rangefinder alignment is perfect, so that's always a good sign. After the M-A, it's going to be hard to remember to turn the camera off when putting it away in the bag 😁, but I already love having the built-in metering.

I like the silver a lot more than I expected to.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 2 Stunden schrieb hdmesa:

After a bad experience with scratched film on a new M-A and Leica CLAed M4-P, I decided to try again. Fingers crossed. Rangefinder alignment is perfect, so that's always a good sign. After the M-A, it's going to be hard to remember to turn the camera off when putting it away in the bag 😁, but I already love having the built-in metering.

I like the silver a lot more than I expected to.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

Why do you think the scratched film was  due to the M-A and not due to a devellopement failiure or a salt grain or sand - grain on the fillm? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Gerade eben schrieb Paulus:

Why do you think the scratched film was  due to the M-A and not due to a devellopement failiure or a salt grain or sand - grain on the fillm? 

Was the pressureplate damaged? 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 2/21/2023 at 8:58 PM, kroko said:

Did anybody replace the lever with the two piece plastic lever from for example the M6? I only ever seen people who replaced the two piece with that from the MP.

John Sypal, of Tokyo Camera Style fame, shoots with an MP with M4-style film-advance lever https://thamesandhudson.com/authors/john-sypal-58231

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Paulus said:

Why do you think the scratched film was  due to the M-A and not due to a devellopement failiure or a salt grain or sand - grain on the fillm? 

Because I sacrificed a new roll of film through each of them and then pulled the film immediately out of the canisters – scratches.

The scratches weren't on just one roll of film nor one film type nor one film manufacturer, but many: CineStill, Kodak, and Fuji.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...