geetee1972 Posted November 30, 2016 Share #41 Posted November 30, 2016 Advertisement (gone after registration) My A7s has been modded by Kolari Vision. Ooh, do tell! Genuinely interested to hear what you had done. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 30, 2016 Posted November 30, 2016 Hi geetee1972, Take a look here Is the Leica SL doomed?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
lct Posted November 30, 2016 Share #42 Posted November 30, 2016 Would not be quite fair on the Leica forum but a lot of infos can be gleaned here: http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1340474 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steppenw0lf Posted December 3, 2016 Share #43 Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) Another view on the Leica SL by three photographers. Far from the "titanic" view. http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/139294-reflecting-on-the-leica-sl-three-photographers-talk-about-the-mirrorless-marvel Edited December 3, 2016 by steppenw0lf 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steveBK Posted December 3, 2016 Share #44 Posted December 3, 2016 That is a promoted post. Like the camera or dislike the camera, but a paid promotion is not a great piece of evidence in either direction Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steppenw0lf Posted December 3, 2016 Share #45 Posted December 3, 2016 (edited) It's not the only promoted post. And the people use their names to promote it. So what's the problem ? Others call it being an "ambassador". You mean this is biased and the "titanic review" is not ? At least they show photos and videos they took with the camera - ignore the rest, if you like. Edited December 3, 2016 by steppenw0lf Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted December 3, 2016 Share #46 Posted December 3, 2016 Ooh, do tell! Genuinely interested to hear what you had done. https://kolarivision.com/product/sony-a7-series-thin-filter-legacy-lens-upgrade/ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaemono Posted February 17, 2018 Share #47 Posted February 17, 2018 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) An interesting piece of analysis: http://thephotofundamentalist.com/leica/leica-sl-doomed/ Are the M and SL lines going to merge, the writer speculates? No, because the SL2 sensor is likely to be very competitive vs. the best FF sensors out there. See here: http://www.towerjazz.com/prs/2017/1030.html And the SL lenses are excellent. α7R III has a better sensor than the SL but the FE lenses are a bit sh!t and it’s a lot more difficult for Sony to catch up in optics. Leica can and will in sensor technology. It’s like that bumper sticker that says “I might be fat (SL sensor) but you’re ugly (Sony lenses) and I can go on a diet.” Edited February 17, 2018 by Chaemono 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkcampbell2 Posted February 17, 2018 Share #48 Posted February 17, 2018 Another view on the Leica SL by three photographers. Far from the "titanic" view. http://www.pocket-lint.com/news/139294-reflecting-on-the-leica-sl-three-photographers-talk-about-the-mirrorless-marvel FYI, Kristen Meister has already dropped the Leica SL and moved back to Nikon. https://scenictraverse.com/blog/2017/10/29/a-new-chapter-the-nikon-d850 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaemono Posted February 17, 2018 Share #49 Posted February 17, 2018 (edited) The D850 sensor is terrific but Leica with its sensor partners will close the gap in the SL2 likely next year. The SL lenses rock. A user in a thread that is now closed (surprise, surprise ) insisted that I do these. I refused at first, but he was bagging for it. So, here we go. I have tons of all kinds of shots like these. Will keep posting them. Less compressed JPEGs here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-x8Mwmw/ α7R III + FE 24-70/2.8 G Masterly resolution at 24 mm Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ISO 200 f/2.8 @1/2000 sec. SL + 24-90 Vario-Elmarit-SL at 24 mm ISO 200 f/2.8 @1/2000 sec. Edited February 17, 2018 by Chaemono Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ISO 200 f/2.8 @1/2000 sec. SL + 24-90 Vario-Elmarit-SL at 24 mm ISO 200 f/2.8 @1/2000 sec. ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/266798-is-the-leica-sl-doomed/?do=findComment&comment=3463469'>More sharing options...
Chaemono Posted February 17, 2018 Share #50 Posted February 17, 2018 (edited) And now the crops Less compressed JPEGs here: https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-x8Mwmw/ α7R III + FE 24-70/2.8 G Masterly resolution at 24 mm Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ISO 200 f/2.8 @1/2000 sec. SL + 24-90 Vario-Elmarit-SL at 24 mm ISO 200 f/2.8 @1/2000 sec. Edited February 17, 2018 by Chaemono Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ISO 200 f/2.8 @1/2000 sec. SL + 24-90 Vario-Elmarit-SL at 24 mm ISO 200 f/2.8 @1/2000 sec. ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/266798-is-the-leica-sl-doomed/?do=findComment&comment=3463470'>More sharing options...
wellfleet Posted February 17, 2018 Share #51 Posted February 17, 2018 FYI, Kristen Meister has already dropped the Leica SL and moved back to Nikon. https://scenictraverse.com/blog/2017/10/29/a-new-chapter-the-nikon-d850 And from a more recent blog post she does a comparison between the 850 and the SL in which states: "This is where it gets tough. In many ways, the cameras both performed exactly as they should have. The Nikon D850, which has twice the sensor resolution of the Leica SL, won any comparison looking for micro-details in the image. But the Leica SL also holds its own in real world shooting, where the difference in resolution only becomes noticeable when zooming in beyond 600%. Leica clearly produces a better lens than Nikon, which should have never been in doubt. Leica is generally considered in a league of their own when it comes to lens designs. But the problem is that the improvement isn't that substantial. Yes, it's there, but only if you are pixel peeping, like we're doing here, are you ever going to notice. Finally, we need to talk about the difference in user experience. I greatly prefer using a mirrorless camera with electronic viewfinder to a prism, meaning I favor the shooting experience of the Leica SL to the Nikon D850." http://scenictraverse.com/blog/2017/12/14/d850vsleicasl 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jkcampbell2 Posted February 17, 2018 Share #52 Posted February 17, 2018 And from a more recent blog post she does a comparison between the 850 and the SL in which states: "This is where it gets tough. In many ways, the cameras both performed exactly as they should have. The Nikon D850, which has twice the sensor resolution of the Leica SL, won any comparison looking for micro-details in the image. But the Leica SL also holds its own in real world shooting, where the difference in resolution only becomes noticeable when zooming in beyond 600%. Leica clearly produces a better lens than Nikon, which should have never been in doubt. Leica is generally considered in a league of their own when it comes to lens designs. But the problem is that the improvement isn't that substantial. Yes, it's there, but only if you are pixel peeping, like we're doing here, are you ever going to notice. Finally, we need to talk about the difference in user experience. I greatly prefer using a mirrorless camera with electronic viewfinder to a prism, meaning I favor the shooting experience of the Leica SL to the Nikon D850." http://scenictraverse.com/blog/2017/12/14/d850vsleicasl Well said! I moved to Leica because I ENJOY using the camera far more than other brands. While there will always be cases where one camera has a slightly better feature, these days any of the major brands will deliver more quality than most photographers need. I look to my tools to enhance my photography experience in "real world shooting" rather than worrying about pixel peeping. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alistairm Posted February 18, 2018 Share #53 Posted February 18, 2018 Slightly tongue in cheek, I guess it comes down to whether you prefer your lenses or your pixels. Or perhaps whether you enjoy an ergonomically comfortable camera with a magnificent viewfinder or the frisson of excitement from viewing your photos at 600%. Fortunately, there are cameras which do both well. I think with camera reviews there is sometimes too much attention on how a sensor can handle bad light or boring detail shots and not enough attention on how they render good light, so the linked reviewer did a good job trying to capture some “real world” scenarios. For me, I’m using Leica systems because when the light is good I’d rather have a Leica than anything else. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaemono Posted February 18, 2018 Share #54 Posted February 18, 2018 Leica is all about available light photography. In FF sensor technology it’s not state of the art in this respect. But it’s only a matter of time. Can you imagine a BSI sensor with these SL lenses? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramarren Posted February 18, 2018 Share #55 Posted February 18, 2018 I'm so bored with the whole 'more pixels' meme as well as with the 'leica is doomed' meme. Silly, useless, dumb things to debate. Let's try to put our minds to better use. 6 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve McGarrett Posted February 18, 2018 Share #56 Posted February 18, 2018 Alistairm, on 18 Feb 2018 - 12:47, said: Slightly tongue in cheek, I guess it comes down to whether you prefer your lenses or your pixels. Or perhaps whether you enjoy an ergonomically comfortable camera with a magnificent viewfinder or the frisson of excitement from viewing your photos at 600%. Fortunately, there are cameras which do both well. I think with camera reviews there is sometimes too much attention on how a sensor can handle bad light or boring detail shots and not enough attention on how they render good light, so the linked reviewer did a good job trying to capture some “real world” scenarios. For me, I’m using Leica systems because when the light is good I’d rather have a Leica than anything else. Totally agree. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BernardC Posted February 18, 2018 Share #57 Posted February 18, 2018 I'm so bored with the whole 'more pixels' meme as well as with the 'leica is doomed' meme. Let's not forget the "it doesn't work in low light" meme, where someone under-exposes a shot by five stops, tries to get them back in ACR, and then declares the camera worthless. As far as I am concerned, the low-light issue was solved 10 years ago when the 5D2 came out. Every top-tier camera since has been great in low light. The SL at ISO 12,800 is even better than the 5D2's ISO 3,200! Is this kind of performance really a showstopper? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chaemono Posted February 18, 2018 Share #58 Posted February 18, 2018 α7R III with the 55 Otus is phenomenal in low-light. BSI sensor with the 50 and 75 Noctilux, the 50 Summilux-M and 50 Summilux-SL will be a stunner. And, one won't have to be afraid to bend inadvertently the lens mount like with the Sony combo. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Donzo98 Posted February 18, 2018 Share #59 Posted February 18, 2018 I think we are lucky to have such outstanding SL glass. Those lenses are spectacular on the SL. They will be even better on the next version of the SL. The future seems bright to me 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jyrkialanen Posted February 18, 2018 Share #60 Posted February 18, 2018 No, because the SL2 sensor is likely to be very competitive vs. the best FF sensors out there. See here: http://www.towerjazz.com/prs/2017/1030.html And the SL lenses are excellent. α7R III has a better sensor than the SL but the FE lenses are a bit sh!t and it’s a lot more difficult for Sony to catch up in optics. Leica can and will in sensor technology. It’s like that bumper sticker that says “I might be fat (SL sensor) but you’re ugly (Sony lenses) and I can go on a diet.” Just out of curiosity, how many FE-lenses have you actually used? You have shown your "tests" with Sony 24-70 in numerous threads already, but what about other lenses? You say that Sony FE lenses are "bit shit" so I guess you have tested all of them or at least very many of them to make such a statement. I know that there aren't many Leica SL-lenses to do comparisons with, certainly you have compared at least Sony GM 50mm to Sl 50mm and Sony GM 85mm to SL 90mm and so on. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.