johnbuckley Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2021 Posted January 18, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) For those who are familiar with the SL and Q menus, sounds like some things have moved there -- continuous shooting, for example. It seems like they have taken good aspects of the SL system and applied them to an M: button pre-sets, joy stick. And if the sensor has been built just for this M, given how good the Q and SL sensors are, this should be a marked upgrade. In 2013, the transition to CMOS left the M240 with a very good sensor -- but a lot has happened since then, and Leica not simply transplanting another system's sensor in the M, but -- as it says -- building one just for it, is a good development. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted January 18, 2017 Posted January 18, 2017 Hi johnbuckley, Take a look here Leica M 10. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
CYBORA Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2022 Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) The ISO dial only goes up to 6400. The highest values will have to be selected via menus, I guess... The letter on the ISO dial other than A is M , and I think it means Menu meaning that override the ISO dial and use the value selected in the Menu as you said. Edited January 18, 2017 by CYBORA 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
matlep Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2023 Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) Until I see photos made with the M10, the rest means very little. You really think they are going to look very much different than from the M240 or the Leica Q? I doubt it. Edited January 18, 2017 by matlep 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert M Poole Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2024 Posted January 18, 2017 You really think they are going to look very much different than from the M240 or the Leica Q? I doubt it. All CMOS sensors give a very similar look IMO. Bring back the CCD! 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2025 Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) I'm interested to learn more about the new sensor. It doesn't say new. It says specially developed. That could mean old sensor that is adapted. Edited January 18, 2017 by Paul J Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2026 Posted January 18, 2017 Awake me when it fits a full frame Foveon 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter H Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2027 Posted January 18, 2017 Advertisement (gone after registration) You really think they are going to look very much different than from the M240 or the Leica Q? I doubt it. No, I don't expect them to be very different. But small differences can be very important. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
matlep Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2028 Posted January 18, 2017 No, I don't expect them to be very different. But small differences can be very important. True Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2029 Posted January 18, 2017 I don't find those sort of small differences make much difference at all. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LocalHero1953 Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2030 Posted January 18, 2017 Until I see photos made with the M10, the rest means very little. What about the enhanced OVF? A combination of larger eyepiece, larger and more magnified view could make a big difference for some. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2031 Posted January 18, 2017 Well it's not 0.85x nor 0.91x so we should get pretty well what we're used to since the M2, with more comfort i guess. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
imants Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2032 Posted January 18, 2017 (edited) What about the enhanced OVF? A combination of larger eyepiece, larger and more magnified view could make a big difference for some. People here continually harp on how gear doesn't make difference it is the photographer's skill that over rides all all this talk seems to negate this stance Edited January 18, 2017 by epsonRD1 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Q Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2033 Posted January 18, 2017 Coming from a M9-P, the new M10 is a huge upgrade. Maybe not so much for M240 owners. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2034 Posted January 18, 2017 Peole here continually harp on how gear doesn't make difference it is the photographer's skill that over rides all all this talk seems to negate this stance Just inferior photogs with no R-D1 experience Imants (is that you?) 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oronet commander Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2035 Posted January 18, 2017 Coming from a M9-P, the new M10 is a huge upgrade. Maybe not so much for M240 owners. About 3500$ huge? As an M9-P owner, I'm not so sure about that... 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pop Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2036 Posted January 18, 2017 People here continually harp on how gear doesn't make difference it is the photographer's skill that over rides all all this talk seems to negate this stance Peole should think again. Think about the influence a small change in the gear such as a lens cap can have on the impact of your image on your audience. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
exile Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2037 Posted January 18, 2017 Indeed, that eyepiece looks huge. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
imants Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2038 Posted January 18, 2017 Just inferior photogs with no R-D1 experience Imants (is that you?) Chuckle on the name change 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robert M Poole Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2039 Posted January 18, 2017 People here continually harp on how gear doesn't make difference it is the photographer's skill that over rides all all this talk seems to negate this stance Most of the upgrades here are for convenience, ISO dial etc. They won't make much difference to the image but they might to your experience. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
imants Posted January 18, 2017 Share #2040 Posted January 18, 2017 Peole should think again. Think about the influence a small change in the gear such as a lens cap can have on the impact of your image on your audience. Yep it is a major concern to the audience they can see this in the image Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.