Jump to content

Show us some Mandler Magic


Artin

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Pictures taken with Mandler lenses 

         •   Elmarit 21 mm/2.8

•   Elmarit-M 28 mm/2.8 (3rd)

•   Summicron 35 mm/2 (1st)

•   Summicron 35 mm/2 (2nd & 3rd)

•   Summicron 35 mm/2 (4th)

•   Summilux-M 35 mm/1.4 C27

•   Summicron 50 mm/2

•   Summicron 50 mm/2 (4th)

•   Summicron-M 50 mm/2.0 C368

•    Elcan 50 mm/2

•   Summilux-M 50 mm/1.4

•   Noctilux-M 50 mm/1.0 20)

•   Summilux 75 mm/1.4 (2nd) 21)

•   Elmar 90 mm/4 (3 elements)

•    Tele-Elmarit 90 mm/2.8 (1st)

•   Tele-Elmarit 90 mm/2.8 (2nd)

•   Elmarit 90 mm/2.8 (2nd) (25)

•   Summicron 90 mm/2 (1st)

•   Summicron 90 mm/2 (2nd)

•   Summicron 90 mm/2.0 (3rd)

•   Elmar 135 mm/4

•   Tele-Elmar 135 mm/4

•   Elmarit 135 mm/2.8 (1st)

•   Elmarit 135 mm/2.8 (2nd)

•   Elcan 66 mm/2 (Extra-high resolution lens for the US Navy)

•   Elcan 90 mm/1.0 C164 (another special ELCAN lens for the US Navy)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by Artin
  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

M-P, Elmarit 21/2.8

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 14
Link to post
Share on other sites

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

MM1 and 50 Summicron Ver 4 
  • Like 5
Link to post
Share on other sites

1962 50mm Summilux v2

Iceland

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

 

 

 

  • Like 10
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I thought this lens still counts as a Mandler design? 

Summilux 50 1.4 Type III (E46)

 

Both taken with the M9

 

21097055168_65757910f9_b.jpg

 

21908979020_6b2af601c1_b.jpg

 

Nice shots, love the colour in the second.

 

I have this lens too, it's a real favourite - I even have the special version with scalloped focus ring - but I'd always understood it be signed off by Karbe (with hood by Rolf Crema!) , as per the Wiki - happy to be corrected of course.

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/50mm_f/1.4_Summilux-M_III

 

I can't remember the rules, are R lenses allowed? I love all the Mandler R lenses I've ever used, more than the M ones to be honest. :o

 

I have no idea about the 135mm M v3 - the Wiki has v2 (1960s release) as Mandler with no detail for the (1970s) v3 but I'd assume that'd be Mandler too - Canada, 1970s, surely must be?

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/135mm_f/2.8_Elmarit-M_II (v2)

 

 

This is 35mm Summilux-M v2, one from Canada to boot.

27511521844_a3cb4a071d_b.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Nice shots, love the colour in the second.

 

I have this lens too, it's a real favourite - I even have the special version with scalloped focus ring - but I'd always understood it be signed off by Karbe (with hood by Rolf Crema!) , as per the Wiki - happy to be corrected of course.

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/50mm_f/1.4_Summilux-M_III

 

I can't remember the rules, are R lenses allowed? I love all the Mandler R lenses I've ever used, more than the M ones to be honest. :o

 

I have no idea about the 135mm M v3 - the Wiki has v2 (1960s release) as Mandler with no detail for the (1970s) v3 but I'd assume that'd be Mandler too - Canada, 1970s, surely must be?

http://www.l-camera-forum.com/leica-wiki.en/index.php/135mm_f/2.8_Elmarit-M_II (v2)

 

 

This is 35mm Summilux-M v2, one from Canada to boot.

27511521844_a3cb4a071d_b.jpg

 

 

Yes I have seen the info on the wiki page too, which seems to contradict with the apparent received wisdom that the lux 50 pre-A E46 has the same optical design as the type II E43, a Mandler lens. Hence my question in my post whether or not the pre-A E46 counts as a Mandler lens. I seem to remember reading it somewhere that the pre-A E46, or Type III, was basically the result of Karbe taking over the Mandler design and keeping it...etc. Something to that effect. 

 

Anyway, I adore the Type III lens, no matter who designed it. At the moment I own a Type II 50 Lux, which does draw similarly to the Type III. Will post some shots from that lens here soon. :)

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

75 Summilux. (MM 246, ISO 8000).

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 9
Link to post
Share on other sites

75 Summilux (M9, ISO 640).

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Noctilux f1 v4. (M240, ISO 250).

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

35 Lux pre   Leica T

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...