RexGig0 Posted October 10, 2019 Share #161 Posted October 10, 2019 Advertisement (gone after registration) I will give “favorite” status to the lens that lured me to try, and then buy into, the Leica M system, a pre-owned Summilux-M 50mm ASPH, found in the display case at Houston Camera Exchange, in Texas. I might never have discovered the others, had I not been tempted to try this one. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 10, 2019 Posted October 10, 2019 Hi RexGig0, Take a look here Your favorite Leica lens?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Stealth3kpl Posted October 10, 2019 Share #162 Posted October 10, 2019 Previously, my first lens, the 35 summicron mk4 for sentimental reasons. In use, latterly, the 50 Summicron Mk5 as I've morphed into a 50 kinda guy (a focal length that just never sat right with me when I used to use SLRs). The 50 Summilux asph in terms of rendering If I had to choose one, as I do when hiking, I'd go for the 35/2 Pete 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted November 13, 2019 Share #163 Posted November 13, 2019 My 35mm f2.4 summarit. I love how it renders images and handles,i use it for 90% of my images. Its a beautiful lens to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TG14 Posted November 13, 2019 Share #164 Posted November 13, 2019 On 12/7/2017 at 8:44 PM, Milan_S said: Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! SL + Noctilux-M f/0.95 ASPH My favorite lenses: 50mm Noctilux-M f/0.95 ASPH on SL 75mm Summilux-M f/1.4 on MM 70mm Summarit-S f/2.5 CS on S Nice. The top corners dont have such a bokeh effect. Was that intended? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stephan54 Posted November 13, 2019 Share #165 Posted November 13, 2019 Most useful while travelling: Elmarit 28asph My to go lens: Summilux 50asph Most fun: Telyt 135 All depends on the subject and occasion. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ZHNL Posted November 13, 2019 Share #166 Posted November 13, 2019 All S glasses 50APO M 50lux ASPH 80LUX R 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daniel C.1975 Posted November 13, 2019 Share #167 Posted November 13, 2019 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) Ha, that's a really hard question. If you force me to choose by, probably death, penalty, I would certainly go for my 35mm FLE. After checking my Lightroom statistics that stays to be very true 1st, by a good margin (double the shots of the 2nd place): SL 35 FLE (most of the time on my camera, preferred FL) 2nd, surprisingly: 28mm Summaron (miracle lens, the more I use it, the more I love it) 3rd, nearly the same amount of photos: Summilux 50 asph (oh, what a lens ... ) 4th, half the number of shots of the 50 Summilux: 21mm SEM - but I love that lens so much 5th, with a good distance: Elmarit 90mm (highly underrated lens) So it should be easy: 35 FLE, but never try to separate me from my other lenses - I will go wild 😉 Cheers Daniel Edited November 13, 2019 by Daniel C.1975 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ramosa Posted November 13, 2019 Share #168 Posted November 13, 2019 Tough call. After experimenting with lots of Leica lenses over the years, I have two Leica lenses now: Cron 35 v4 and Cron 50 v5. I love both of these lenses, classics that I use on my MM1. I like these two lenses' similar signatures and compactness. I use the 35 more these days, but would be torn to choose a favorite, thanks to Walter Mandler's brilliant design work. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted November 21, 2019 Share #169 Posted November 21, 2019 50 2.0 ASPH. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bags27 Posted November 21, 2019 Share #170 Posted November 21, 2019 On 11/13/2019 at 4:17 PM, Daniel C.1975 said: If you force me to choose by, probably death, penalty, I would certainly go for my 35mm FLE. That lens has never left my camera. But then again, I've only had it for 3 days. 😀 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
smkoush Posted November 21, 2019 Share #171 Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) I used to say the 28mm Summicron, but these days I’ll add the 35mm Summilux pre-asph, two compact lenses that are complimentary because they are so different. One on the M-P and one on the MP. Edited November 21, 2019 by smkoush Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tommonego@gmail.com Posted November 22, 2019 Share #172 Posted November 22, 2019 Id have to say the lens that has stayed with me for 40+ years a 35 Summilux Canada. But now with the CL the 23 Summicron stays on the camera the most, just like the 35 field of view. Summilux on my CL Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/261451-your-favorite-leica-lens/?do=findComment&comment=3859517'>More sharing options...
SunnySixteen Posted November 22, 2019 Share #173 Posted November 22, 2019 Based on my favorite photos I would say Summicron 50 v4, with the Summicron 35 v4 a close second. I'm continually blown away how sharp the 50mm is (on film) for an older pre asph lens. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
james.liam Posted November 24, 2019 Share #174 Posted November 24, 2019 Day-to-day: 50 APO.....it is a lens that constantly surprises; colors are true-to-life, resolution and contrast at the point of focus is more a slice of memory than a manipulated image. A sublime and profound design statement by Herr Karbe, just as the 75 Summilux was for Dr Mandler 21 SEM.....ditto above, I marvel at its images For versatility and flexibility for travel: MATE........self explanatory, again a marvel of engineering and aesthetics, despite some of the unavoidable design compromises 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AndreasG Posted November 25, 2019 Share #175 Posted November 25, 2019 No. 1 Elmarit 2.8/28 ASPH - fits anytime, everywhere No. 2 Summilux 1.4/35 pre ASPH - the Mandler glow! No. 3 APO Summicron 2/50 - no need to comment... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Milan_S Posted November 25, 2019 Share #176 Posted November 25, 2019 1. 50 Summicron-M f2 APO 2. 35mm Summilux f1.4 ASPH FLE 3. 75mm Summilux f1.4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Musotographer Posted November 25, 2019 Share #177 Posted November 25, 2019 1) Summicron 50 Rigid - built like a very agile small tank and a huge pleasure to use 2) Summilux 35 pre-asph - both of these particularly wonderful in B&W 3) Summilux-M 75/Summilux-R 80 - magic wands for portraits, with exquisite colour. Every time I download the files from these siblings I am blown away. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
adan Posted November 26, 2019 Share #178 Posted November 26, 2019 I can give you mine in descending order. Note a bias to Mandler 1980s lenses - they just reproduce color and draw in a way I have missed ever since my 1970s Canon FD lenses (and are smaller and lighter and usually even better). Based also on which ones I've sold least and/or gone back to soonest. 1. 21 f/2.8 Elmarit-M - my main "money lens." Never thought of selling it since I got it as my first M lens 18 years ago. First lens I sent for 6-bit coding in 2006. I could go through life with nothing else if I had to. 3. 135 f/4 Tele-Elmar - shame it's an f/4, but such is rangefinder life. In the right light (and even more so since getting ISO 10000 with the M10) I vastly prefer it to a 90 of any speed. 4. 75 f/1.4 Summilux - came late to this, mostly because of price and unpredictability on film. Once I got an M9, it became invaluable, since it gives me three lenses in one: fast short tele for dim light, beautful portrait lens in any light, close-focusing studio still-life lens. Thus combining a 50 f/1.4, 90 f/2, and 90 Macro (or some other 75 with 0.7m focusing) in one purchase. Sometimes the weight is an issue, most of the time not. When weight is an issue, I go to... 5. 50 Zeiss ZM Planar. In my experience slightly sharper than the current Summicron, at least in the center at f/2, and cheap. A new Leica focal length for me (excepting the M8 years) - haven't used a 50 regularly since about 1978. 2. Out of position because I don't actually have one at the moment - 35 Summicron v.4 (sold once too often; now they are expensive and difficult to find with 6-bit coding - would you believe I found one in medium condition for $695 back in 2001?). A 35 Voigtlander Nokton f/1.4 is filling in until I find a 'cron ready to roll. (6 - in the warm-up box. If I run across a pristine 90mm f/2.8 Tele-Elmarit-M ("thin") it will be tempting. The last one I tried was a lemon - far more pincushion-distortion and corner smearing than in some other copies I've had - must have been a bad day in Midland (ELCAN). Most of the time if I carry one of these with the 135, I always prefer the 135 shots. But if I'm absolutely sure I won't need the 135 "perspective"/reach or 75 speed/close-focus, an insanely small lens for the specs, and a better third-wheel with the 21/35 combo than the 50, for my purposes.) 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike3996 Posted November 26, 2019 Share #179 Posted November 26, 2019 I've only owned and shot 3 Leica lenses so far (11 months into M ownership so perhaps you'll forgive). Between the 35 Summicron ASPH and the 50 Summilux ASPH it's clear to me that I prefer the 35 cron. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
evikne Posted November 26, 2019 Share #180 Posted November 26, 2019 To me, it must be a 50mm Summilux, because that’s the most versatile and average lens I can think of. But I am really torn between the ASPH and pre-ASPH. I prefer the sharpness from the ASPH and the unsharpness from the pre-ASPH. And to make the confusion complete, I am now also torn between the ordinary ASPH and the Black Chrome version. I prefer the focusing and handling of the Black Chrome, but I don’t like the big, separate sunshade, and that I cannot just put on a lens cap directly on the lens. So the choice between the two is driving me nuts. But the one lens I for sure will never get rid of, is the pre-ASPH E46, so this is probably my number one lens. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.