Jump to content
Herve5

how do you catch the pixels over 6000x4000?

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I'm a bit of a newcomer here and on the Q; I'm interested in the idea that, at least in some cases, it'll be useful to get back the large unused part in the DNG originals (more than 100 pixels each side, although way less in the vertical direction, IIRC).

I am not an user of Lightroom, but I tried installing the bundled version, just to discover its default processing of the DNG eliminates these "edges", but maybe an experienced user will tell me how to recover them...

In the meanwhile I'm playing with Graphic Converter on OSX, RawTherapee and Darktable : each of them perfecly "see the edges", each one has its lens barrel compensation tricks... Which one do you use, or would you recommend?

Below, two pics, the first one being the automated jpeg produced in-camera, the second a crop from the (even larger) DNG image when opened in Graphic Converter (and then barrel-compensated and curves-corrected -a very poor result indeed that you'll pardon me)

OK, I couldn't attach both files within this post without significant loss (I'm probably not wise enough); here are two urls:

 

the 'simple jpeg'

 

the larger DNG, processed and cropped in GC

 

TIA!

Hervé

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I use CaptureOne, great software, I see edges.

Merci Soizic!

and... now I just see my version of OSX is too old for C1 :-(

 

[edit] Now I've tried both GraphicCoverter and RawTherapee, I see that while they do open the full 6120-wide image, once I start correcting barrel I'm somehow brought back to a smaller width, presumably because of the cropping.

So either I zoom back at the same time (they allow this), resulting in all the large image details being kept but at a slightly smaller scale, or I dont, and I lose most of the extra sides.

If anyone can hint towards a process that'd keep 6120 pixels and correct barrel I'd be very interested 8-)

Edited by Herve5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm a bit of a newcomer here and on the Q; I'm interested in the idea that, at least in some cases, it'll be useful to get back the large unused part in the DNG originals (more than 100 pixels each side, although way less in the vertical direction, IIRC).

I am not an user of Lightroom, but I tried installing the bundled version, just to discover its default processing of the DNG eliminates these "edges", but maybe an experienced user will tell me how to recover them...

In the meanwhile I'm playing with Graphic Converter on OSX, RawTherapee and Darktable : each of them perfecly "see the edges", each one has its lens barrel compensation tricks... Which one do you use, or would you recommend?

Below, two pics, the first one being the automated jpeg produced in-camera, the second a crop from the (even larger) DNG image when opened in Graphic Converter (and then barrel-compensated and curves-corrected -a very poor result indeed that you'll pardon me)

OK, I couldn't attach both files within this post without significant loss (I'm probably not wise enough); here are two urls:

 

the 'simple jpeg'

 

the larger DNG, processed and cropped in GC

 

TIA!

Hervé

I am sorry but when I open your links the images are quite small - impossible to do any sort of comparison between the photos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

See you are on ipernity too, I am Xata there, and you?

Hervé S. :-)

 

I am sorry but when I open your links the images are quite small - impossible to do any sort of comparison between the photos.

You have the original files there :

http://www.ipernity.com/doc/herve_s/41186486

and

http://www.ipernity.com/doc/herve_s/41186482

Ah. Now in spite of my CC license allowing download, I'm not sure someone not registered on ipernity can actually download them -but at least the browser can show them, full scale, and along with the EXIFs etc.

 

Thank you for your reactions!

H.

Edited by Herve5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hervé S. :-)

 

You have the original files there :

http://www.ipernity.com/doc/herve_s/41186486

and

http://www.ipernity.com/doc/herve_s/41186482

Ah. Now in spite of my CC license allowing download, I'm not sure someone not registered on ipernity can actually download them -but at least the browser can show them, full scale, and along with the EXIFs etc.

 

Thank you for your reactions!

H.

 

Ok, we are already acquainted over there, another nikonist who has also a Q...!

 

For the rest I cannot help you, I edit as little as possible, I have the iMac editor and PS elements.

Edited by Lucena

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I open my DNG images with a black strip on one side of the image in LR, the black is open once LR builds the thumbnail. I trust that's what you are referring to here.

One cannot get more than the 24MP from what I know. (6000x4000=24000000)

Edited by algrove

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

When I open my DNG images with a black strip on one side of the image in LR, the black is open once LR builds the thumbnail. I trust that's what you are referring to here.

One cannot get more than the 24MP from what I know. (6000x4000=24000000)

Algrove, the Q DNG are 6120 pixels wide, only Lightroom doesn't show this (because it automatically applies lens correction and crop).

All other Raw editors access the 6120 pixels.

My issue is just to find a raw editor that would if possible "know" the Q lens (instead of correcting it myself) and, when extrapolating the barrel correction, save more pixels thant the dozen extra I get when I do this with Graphic Converter and then crop to the largest inside rectangle...

Edited by Herve5

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Ian clegg
      First time post, be gentle. 
      I want to bring my raw files from Monochrom into silver efex. SEP. But it will only accept RGB. Will this lead to loss of quality ? When I scan my black and white negs I do so in greyscale and that’s  perfect for printing to black and white paper at Metro. 
      It seems to defeat the object of the Monochrom if I have to convert to RGB ?
      Am I missing a trick ? What say you ?
    • By maxsimkammerer
      Update 26. November 2019: Das hier ehemals verlinkte Forum existiert nicht mehr.
      Im Systemkamera-Forum gibt es aber jetzt ein eigenes deutsches Capture One Forum
    • By Stick
      What is the benefit to shooting JPEG and RAW?
      I am starting to get overwhelmed by having doubles of all pictures, not to mention the additional space requirement.
       
      Does anyone shoot only JPEG? Why?
      Does anyone shoot only RAW? Why?
      Thanks!
    • By kuzco9x
      I just firgure out that my Leica M10, the DNG files opened and exported to JPG by photoshop are always brighter and less contrast than the original JPG generated by M10 body.
      Is there something wrong?
      This is the jpg exported from dng.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden! And this is original jpg by body

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By MNvA
      Ich habe RAW-Dateien aus der D-Lux 7 mit dem Adobe-DNG-Converter in DNG-Dateien umgewandelt und dann in Lightroom 6 importiert. Dort werden die Dateien ganz kurz in Farbe dargestellt, dann allerdings dauerhaft nur in SW. Gibt es eine Möglichkeit, die RAW-Dateien in LR6 als Farbbilder zu importieren, ohne auf das aktuelle LR-Abo umsteigen zu müssen?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy