Jump to content

Does anyone use DxO Optics Pro for PP?


Guest

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

So I downloaded a trial version of DxO Optics Pro and I am very impressed.  

 

While it doesn't bring significant improvement to every single image for me (particularly the one's that are well-exposed in good lighting), it has rendered major improvements to many, particularly tougher shots requiring PP "surgery".  (I would consider myself a good intermediate LR/PS user.)

 

The package seems to take a very balanced approach to applying its changes.  Images seem to have improved sharpness,contrast, clarity and overall 3D pop.  

 

I'm no Photoshop guru, and it seems that I can bring my images close in LR/PS, but this package is easy enough to use and seems to produce great results without much fuss (so you don't have to spend a lot of time or be a PS maven to get very good results).

 

I don't see this replacing Photoshop (you can't dodge and burn for instance and there's no bandaid tool), nor is this an organizing tool like Lightroom, but it seems to be a good tool to have in the arsenal to get the most from (marginal) photos.

 

Am I barking up the wrong tree here?  Are there better DNG PP tools to consider - or should I just suck it in and spend more time learning or using PhotoShop?

 

As always, I appreciate your constructive input.

 

Best regards for a happy new year.

DGP

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like it. So far.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

I use DxO for most all of my keeper photos.  I combine it with LR.  I load my images to LR and select the ones that I wish for further processing.  The selected photos are then transferred to DxO using the DxO LR plugin.  One thing that is a challenge for the Leica T with DxO is that the only lens profile is for the 23mm so you have to manually correct for distortion in DxO.  This can be time consuming but I think the results are worth it. 

 

I think DxO colors are better along with slightly more detail and much better noise reduction.  I also find the flesh tones are better with DxO.

 

DxO has become a key processing tool for me.  In fact, I have sometimes waited for DxO to support a camera before I would buy it.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...