Jump to content

Leica SL Image Thread ...post your examples here ....

thighslapper

By thighslapper
in Leica SL System

 Share

Recommended Posts

Recommended

Posted by jaapv,

How to upload images: Prepare the image as follows: 1.   The image should be sRGB and 8-bits 2.   Reduce the size to 2048 pixels on the longest side. (smaller sizes can be set, but are not recommended) 3.   Sharpen properly for screen. 4.   Save as JPG to your desktop, reducing JPG quality to produce 2000 kB (5000 kB for sponsoring members). 5.   In Lightroom these parameters should be set in the Export dialog. 6.   In the Forum posting or editing box, click “choose Fil
Recommended by jaapv
  • Like

1 reaction

Go to this post
  • Replies 11k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Ken Abrahams
Ken Abrahams

Sugarloaf Rock with 21 SEM and ND filter 2 minute exposure f11

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

su25
su25

Tromso, Norway. Leica SL + 24-90mmSL I was extremely lucky to have experienced the Northern Lights. They were dancing all around us. Moonlight made it that much more spectacular, as the foreground w

Ingo
Ingo

SL with WATE, 16mm

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Posted Images

hofo100

hofo100

Posted
Posted (edited)

Took the new SVE 16-35 on a short trip to New York - this lens is not only for landscape photography...

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Edited by hofo100
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
hofo100

hofo100

Posted
Posted

...another one

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
hofo100

hofo100

Posted
Posted

...and #3 with the SVE 16-35

 

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites
hofo100

hofo100

Posted
Posted

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Are thes pics processed from single pics or mutiple pics HDR?

 

 

No HDR etc. Development only in LR with only moderate use of clarity etc. Just applied some "split toning" and white balance set on 10000K to achieve this look.

 

Regards, Holger

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
helged

helged

Posted
Posted

No HDR etc. Development only in LR with only moderate use of clarity etc. Just applied some "split toning" and white balance set on 10000K to achieve this look.

 

Regards, Holger

 

 

Thanks. The third one, in particular, has a look from the 50ies - nice!

Link to post
Share on other sites
jplomley

jplomley

Posted
Posted

Very cool work. I was thinking of this lens for landscape only....it appears equally at home on the street. Wonder if it could be pressed into reportage and how might people react to a "pro" looking camera and lens when compared to the M10 for example?

Link to post
Share on other sites
sillbeers15

sillbeers15

Posted
Posted (edited)

Very cool work. I was thinking of this lens for landscape only....it appears equally at home on the street. Wonder if it could be pressed into reportage and how might people react to a "pro" looking camera and lens when compared to the M10 for example?

The M10 is a purist photographic tool and so are the optically marvelous M lenses. The system calls for a competent user with patience and grace. I say so cause as much as I would to pick up my M10 and start manual focusing, and accepting the range of lenses more suited for usage are shorter in focal length and not talk about incorporating fill in lights....

On the other end, the SL system with native lenses cover wider focal length coupled with efficiency & convenience of AF, weather seal and having to change lenses less often and not to mention that the SL lenses do indeed produce more desirable images over the marvelous M lenses. Although one can say the M lenses are more characteristic but I personally see the pics produced by the SL lenses at a different level.

So instead of comparing both M & SL system, I’ve decided keeping both to complement each other allowing me to use the SL as workhorse and the M as my soul mate ( to forgive myself of shooting more out of focused shots,...but still love the gear).

Edited by sillbeers15
  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites
HeinzX

HeinzX

Posted
Posted

First one is the real thing - I am sure, you will recognize it - the other two

fantasy. With SL and 24/90.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
AndreasAM

AndreasAM

Posted
Posted

Endless Aquablue

 

Leica SL / Summilux-R 35mm./1.4 at f2.4

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 6
Link to post
Share on other sites
AndreasAM

AndreasAM

Posted
Posted

"Small Change" (yes, Tom Waits)

 

Leica SL / Summilux-R 35mm./1.4 at f2.0

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
scott kirkpatrick

scott kirkpatrick

Posted
Posted (edited)

An embassy in Jerusalem...

 

28336194068_6a3fe0bedf_h.jpgS1020042 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr 16-35 SL @ 16mm.

 

This is what an embassy in Jerusalem ought to look like, but it's not.  The lovely Salameh Villa, built in the 1930's, has been the residence of the Belgian Consul-General since 1948.  It's on a street which also contains the Israeli President's residence and the Academy of Sciences.

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
scott kirkpatrick

scott kirkpatrick

Posted
Posted (edited)

Last week, the US consulate in Jerusalem was re-designated the US embassy in Jerusalem.  That's a hotel on the left.  The consulate is on the right.  Most of what you see is the parking garage:

 

42162988592_24b00d07d3_h.jpgS1020047 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

 

Flags along the streets leading to the consulate make it easier to locate (it has been a bit hard to find in the past, as it is located in the far south east of the city):

 

41308710365_af64208428_h.jpgS1020044 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

 

And there were joint displays of Israeli and US flags, like these now at the consulate, on show throughout the city.

 

41488087464_27f88038c3_h.jpgS1020050 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

40401802350_c20d84e623_h.jpgS1020053 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

 

But the only visible change to date is this plaque:

 

27338023637_f25383af43_h.jpgS1020061 by scott kirkpatrick, on Flickr

 

By the weekend, the US flags in the rest of Jerusalem have been replaced by a less showy display of flags of Panama, whose officials are in town next week.

Edited by scott kirkpatrick
  • Like 8
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...