BBestone Posted November 7, 2015 Share #1 Posted November 7, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) Relatively new to post processing and am currently in giant learning curve in Lightroom 5 and Nik. I have the D 109 and was wondering if it was better to put it on monochrome(raw) in camera then to convert it in Lightroom/Nik to black and white?. I also have a Digiulx 2 that takes amazing black and whites in camera. But at this time I'm learning the 109 and was wondering which would give the best results? Thank you all, Barb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 7, 2015 Posted November 7, 2015 Hi BBestone, Take a look here Converting photo to B&W in camera or in computer. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
pico Posted November 7, 2015 Share #2 Posted November 7, 2015 It is generally better to capture RAW and convert to B&W in an image processor such as LR or Photoshop. Do not accept the in-camera interpretation to B&W. You have far more creative control in the image processor. For example, you can select colors and tune each to the brightness/tone in the B&W rendering. Someone can probably point to good tutorials and examples. Or I could later. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chuck Albertson Posted November 8, 2015 Share #3 Posted November 8, 2015 Raw capture is always in color (unless you have one of the M Monochroms), no matter what you set the out-of-camera JPEG to, so you'll have to convert it to B&W. Silver Efex Pro does it well, but Lightroom is quite good too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted November 8, 2015 Share #4 Posted November 8, 2015 Keep in mind that RAW (DNG) provides greater flexibility for interpretation not just immediately, but down the road in the event you decide to reprocess images using changing software and/or your own new interpretation. People have their own preferences regarding software. Generally one becomes attached to the one that they take the time to use and explore over an extended time. Not much different than the hardware, e.g., Nikon/Canon, debates....both can generate good results in the right hands. My thought is to pick one and stick to it for a good while before introducing new or supplemental alternatives. This is true throughout the print chain, which is where the ultimate benefits of PP can be realized, and where many other variables add complexity....paper choices, etc. A former teacher embedded the notion of 'getting one foot on a rock.' The key is a disciplined workflow....and a good 'eye'....not the software chosen, as long as you can get comfortable using the tools. LR works for me....not so much for others here. Forums are like that. Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.