bernie.lcf Posted June 24, 2015 Share #41 Posted June 24, 2015 Advertisement (gone after registration) The image format is said to be 24x36mm. The image delivered by the camera is said to hold 6000x4000px. The sensor is said to hold 26.3MP. That's what I read as well. However, for what it's worth the uncorrected RAW image (as opened in RawTherapee) has 6008 x 4008 pixels. The JPG and corrected image have 6000 x 4000 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Hi bernie.lcf, Take a look here 28mm focal length, but what is the actual field of view after lens correction?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
digitalfx Posted June 24, 2015 Share #42 Posted June 24, 2015 could be ........ but the LR crop, dng and jpg, match the C1 jpg pic in terms of the borders. just saying that in this raw translation, no official C1 release yet for the Q, perhaps C1 is picking the actual wider FOv suggested by many -- the lens is really 24mm or 25mm No, the uncorrected image is NOT 24mm or 25mm. Its only about 5% different than the final image. If you are seeing the uncorrected image in C1, it should be obvious. The edges are distorted and the corners are vignetted. Look at the first image in this thread...is that what you are seeing? Why don't you use LR? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted June 24, 2015 Share #43 Posted June 24, 2015 All looks fine to me. And I prefer C1 it is better at raw conversion and I am used to it Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daedalus2000 Posted June 25, 2015 Share #44 Posted June 25, 2015 All looks fine to me. And I prefer C1 it is better at raw conversion and I am used to it In Capture One when you choose the crop for a Q DNG, you can actually see the full (?) 6491 x 4110 image without the dark corners.. Is it the case that Capture one applies corrections but also keeps the full size of the uncorrected image? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sblitz Posted June 25, 2015 Share #45 Posted June 25, 2015 It might, will be interesting to see once they release 8.x to include the Q Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
microview Posted June 29, 2015 Share #46 Posted June 29, 2015 Interesting new article by Sean Reid about the Q lens correction on his (subscription) site. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted June 29, 2015 Share #47 Posted June 29, 2015 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) Interesting new article by Sean Reid about the Q lens correction on his (subscription) site. Great article! I wish he would eliminate his silly format which does nothing but punish his subscribers. If someone wants to steal his words, they will do it. His methods to protect his articles only punish those who pay for the privilege to read his excellent technical articles. To summarize a few points, The lens is a 28mm even uncorrected There is a loss of resolution in corners due to the correction, but its minimal Its one of the best cameras of this type that he has tested The full article is worth the read. Edited June 29, 2015 by digitalfx Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
microview Posted June 29, 2015 Share #48 Posted June 29, 2015 Great article! I wish he would eliminate his silly format which does nothing but punish his subscribers. If someone wants to steal his words, they will do it. His methods to protect his articles only punish those who pay for the privilege to read his excellent technical articles. And don't you just hate the way trying to scroll down for texts and everything jumps up or down, or doesn't seem to want to do either? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted June 29, 2015 Share #49 Posted June 29, 2015 And don't you just hate the way trying to scroll down for texts and everything jumps up or down, or doesn't seem to want to do either? Yes, its very strange that we pay for this. Ive cancelled my subscription several times over the years strictly because of the format. Unfortunately I keep coming back. I wish he would give his subscribers a worthy format and trust that they won't steal it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Lss- Posted June 30, 2015 Share #50 Posted June 30, 2015 Its one of the best cameras of this type that he has tested If you feel revealing the comparison group is not infringing on the guy's intellectual property, I would be quite interested in hearing what are the other cameras of this type (especially those also among the best of them). Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted June 30, 2015 Share #51 Posted June 30, 2015 If you feel revealing the comparison group is not infringing on the guy's intellectual property, I would be quite interested in hearing what are the other cameras of this type (especially those also among the best of them). He didn't specify, but he has tested most everything and said something to the effect of...the Q is one of the best EFC's Ive tested. Its a very thorough review, highly technical and has very little bad to say about the Q. It covers the details of how and why Leica chose software correction and the results. Worth the cost of admission to read if you can handle the format. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jjesp Posted September 14, 2021 Share #52 Posted September 14, 2021 This guy says the Leica Q is closer to 24mm than 28mm 🙃 He even shows some comparison shots with different lenses.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjUXCVuR2IM Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.