Jump to content

NEW: Leica Q - Full Frame Compact with Leica M Feeling


Leica Q - Your Opinion  

627 members have voted

  1. 1. Is the Leica Q interesting for you?

    • I want one - where can I pre-order?
      152
    • I'm interested, but I'll wait for tests
      82
    • Interesting, but I want a 35mm or 50mm lens
      109
    • Leica Q with interchangeable lenses please
      189
    • Great supplement for my Leica M
      87
    • Interesting but too expensive
      82
    • Nothing for me...
      55


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 168
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Solitude   Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!

I bought the Q a week ago.  Have had a love/hate relationship with my  M9 for four years, including problems with the M9 sensor and thought I would not buy another Leica.  But the Leica Q has everything I every wished I had in the M9.  It is stunning.  Full manual of course but great auto when I want quick street pix.  And I mean quick, focus is almost instant, exposure mostly spot on and the EVF is amazingly good.  Electronic sensor is quiet. I could go on and on.   I cannot fault it.  Will sel

Leica has introduced the Leica Q a full-frame compact camera with Summilux 28mm lens.   We have all information and product images in our blog and a first review of the Leica Q.   The specs at a glance: Full format 24 MP CMOS Sensor 28mm f1.7 Summilux lens Digital zoom option for 35 or 50 mm 3.68 MP EVF with digital frame selector Contrast autofocus Manual focussing with magnifier or focus peaking 1/16,000 electronic shutter max. ISO 50,000 Continuous shooting with up to 10 fps

Posted Images

Just as a side-note to this, only today Leica replaced my M-A – the most electronic free camera that you can buy – because of an intermittent light leak problem that first showed up back in January and which was becoming less infrequent. Seems that nothing is forever, whether it contains electronic tat or not.

 

How is that relevant to this thread?

.

Link to post
Share on other sites

An attractive camera indeed.  Very tempting, but I'd be overwhelmingly tempted if Leica offered a version which took interchangeable M lenses.  Then the Q would present a real challenge to the Sony A7 range. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

A VERY interesting camera from Leica.  I loved my D-Lux 4 when I first shot with a Leica (okay it was a rebrand, but let's not quibble now).  I loved auto focus when I had it and now you can manual focus as well with the Q?  Nice.  And it's a FULL FRAME.  Bonus!  Massive pixels count versus my little old D-Lux AND it focuses faster!  As much as I loved that little D-Lux, it had a bit of a lag when you snapped a shot.  You get used to it, but still....(had to unlearn that lag when I went all manual with the M3).  It's a bit out of my price range but hmmm.....very tempting.  It's actually hard for me to decide, really whether to go Monchrom or Q.  Either way, bravo Leica!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

If Leica doesn't hurry up and come out with a small full frame camera with interchangeable lenses, I am going to have to break down and get the Sony A7 with the Zeiss zoom.  The small Leica fixed lens (X2) has been nice back up for travel but not versatile enough and the Sony with a Zeiss zoom plus the capability for fitting my Leica Lens becomes increasingly appealing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I posted elsewhere that the Q is 130mm (W) x 80mm (H) x 93mm (L) whilst an M240 with 28 Summicron fitted is 139mm (W) x 80mm(H) x 80mm (L).

Weight(with batteries) is 665 and 908gm respectively.  Ther Q is not really a compact compared to the M240 but is lighter.

 

I am a little disappointed as I was hoping it would be a bit more ''compact''.

 

Weight, AF, and high ISO performance advantages (?) are a different issue.

 

Will need to get hands on before committing.

Edited by MarkP
Link to post
Share on other sites

Oh, I really like this one. Will most likely get it at some point. The 28mm isn't an issue at all as this would be used as a backup or fun camera.. Well a smaller and lighter backup camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I have used the Sony RX1R for quite a while. Based on what can be understood from product information and pictures alone, Leica has addressed pretty much all the issues I have with the Sony. The Leica Q is not as small and light as the RX1R, but this is not a huge issue for me given that the RX1R is not really a pocketable camera either with its bulky lens. Overall, I think getting the Leica Q would therefore be a real upgrade for me. Both cameras work for me in terms of focal length.

 

At the moment, I am still considering the new Monochrom. I don't know if I will have budget for either camera (the Q is quite close), but definitely not both of them.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Too wide for me, 35 mm would have been ideal. Nikon just had a big "fail" with the Nikon Coolpix A. Whilst it was the apsc sensor it had an equivalent to a 28mm lens. Within 12 months it was discounted to half price and it's now officially discontinued . I'm led to believe the Sony RX 1 has done very well indeed as have the Fuji X 100 series with equivalent 35mm lenses. I'm sure Leica will have done plenty of market research so I wish them well with it, but I think 35mm would have been a better starting point , with the possibility of releasing a 28mm and/or 50 mm  alternative later on . 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I used one today during a dealer demo.  I rarely use autofocus normally but I found this camera the perfect tool for street photography.

I particularly liked the quality inbuilt macro.

This will take 80% of the images I normally use a M camera for.

Thumbs up!

 

John Corneille

 

PS  Some varied images here: https://www.facebook.com/cameraexchangemelbourne

Edited by topogon
Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica has introduced the Leica Q a full-frame compact camera with Summilux 28mm lens.

 

The specs at a glance:

  • Full format 24 MP CMOS Sensor
  • 1/16,000 electronic shutter
  • max. ISO 50,000
  • Continuous shooting with up to 10 fps
  • Wifi / NFC

I think that what we have here is the outline of the next M and hopefully the next T. Overall the M will get a processor upgrade, WiFi, and a sensor upgrade. The existence of this Q actually suggests to me that the next M is closer than I expected. We won't be waiting until Late 2016, it will probably be this fall. Most of the engineering for the next M is already done. I wouldn't be surprised if they shared a logic board but had a slightly different circuit firmware load. They just run the ribbon cable that runs the EVF to the port below the hot shoe rather than over to the left side of the camera. Antenna placement for the WiFi and NFC will be a bit more challenging on the M but I expect that it can be rerouted over to the left side of the camera near the buttons and control dials.

 

As for the T, I hope that they use this body style and layout for the next T-mount camera. It doesn't have to replace the current T but it provides an alternative user interface on the body for T-mount lenses.

 

However, I really believe that the biggest thing that they can adapt from the Q to the T is the UI for the lenses.  The big things that I would like to see are: 

- a focus tab on the lens

- physical stops on the MF ring with an AF setting

- an integrated macro extension tube or maybe for the T lenses it doesn't have to be integrated but an optional accessory. However, I think that this should have been built into the 18-56.

- Aperture on the lens

- focus scales engraved into and then painted onto the lens. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

With over $10K invested in Leica M glass already and without the ability to change lenses OR use my existing Leica glass this Q is a non-starter for me. The limitations of the 28mm lens and inability to use my existing glass makes this a non starter for me as I love my 75 and 90mm lenses on my M9. But I am sure others will embrace it (esp those with lots of excess cash to blow). Personally for $4300 I would rather buy a nice slightly used M240 and keep using my Leica glass. I find that waiting a year or two after new models come out is the best way to get the Leica experience without the Leica sticker shock. My M9 was a refurb with full warranty for around 40% off, and I've also purchased several 9+ condition used lenses for 25% under retail with no regrets. It's kinda like buying a certified used BMW or Mercedes with a couple of miles on it......

Link to post
Share on other sites

That I have a nice set of M lenses I would like to continue to use is the main reason I did not walk out of the Leica store today with the Q. But otherwise its a really great camera and I hope there is an ILC version of it (taking new AF and the M lenses) in the future. This also would allow Leica to dial back the "gadgets" on the pure M cameras, as they would be for those who just want a rangefinder and manual focus.

 

Peter

Link to post
Share on other sites

How about an optical viewfinder/rangefinder and option for manual focus?

 

It offers manual focus with focus peaking in the EVF.  The fixed lens is manual focus and autofocus.  There's no room for an optical viewfinder/rangefinder.  And an optical viewfinder/rangefinder would dramatically increase the cost.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like almost everyone here my feeling are, "very nice, interesting, but ... "

 

And hasn't this been the case for so many non M Leicas over recent years? There always seem to be good reasons why Leica does what it does and yet for me they seem to just miss the mark. Obviously these are very subjective things, but it doesn't look like I'm alone in my feelings and observations. The reason I comment at all is because I want to like this camera and it could so easily have filled a niche in my bag.

 

I've been a very happy M user for 30 years. In addition to my M6 and M8 I loved my D2 and enjoy my V Lux 4. I would really like to like this Q as I would have the XVario (no viewfinder. An add on doesn't count) and the T (no viewfinder and one or two other things). But always my response is "yes, but ..."

 

I can see why this doesn't have a zoom lens. As a full frame camera it would be huge, even with, say, an f/2.8 (too slow for many) max aperture. But why not interchangeable M mount? Surely it cannot really be cost. (And the Q ain't cheap anyway!) And it wouldn't really compete with the M, which is so much more. And why wouldn't Leica want a bigger market anyway?

 

I like 28mm and it used to be the most used general lens on my Ms, but I don't think it would suit me without the choice of something else sometimes. No, I don't believe in digital zooms - surely not!

 

I really like the look of the Q. Full frame - fantastic. Despite loving my rangefinders, I can use a good EVF - I hardly notice it on my OMD-EM1. I will go and handle the Q when I can and probably end up saying that I really want to like it, but ... Mainly because of the fixed lens.

 

BTW How can a f/1.7 be a Summilux? 

( OK, because Leica say it is! But it is odd.)

 

So near and yet not quite, sorry Leica. Not for me, quite. Next time I hope.

 

Tim

Edited by Tim B
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By rossg821
      Hello all.
      My Leica Q of two years all of the sudden shows a pretty severe Purple / Greenish tint to everything through the back LCD, but not in the EVF or the actual photo files. The issue popped up out of nowhere after a flight, and I've done everything I can on my end to fix it but nothing has worked. Anyone else have a similar experience? Really trying to avoid sending this thing in for however much that will cost to fix. Firmware is up to date. The photos attached are the difference between the back LCD and the EVF (Which has normal color). Apologies for the bunk iPhone photos but at least you can see the difference in color.

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By bgb
      I purchased a Q end of last year, liked it so much that I sold my Nikon DSLR, Lumix FZ-2500 and Fuji XE-T3. I then purchased the CL with the 18-56mm lens a few months later. Now with adapters to use my Rokinon wide-angles, and 7 Artisan lenses I find myself using the Leica CL way more than the Q.  There's no doubt that the IQ of photos from the Q, a full-frame camera, are better than the Leica CL, t's a fantastic camera and lens with macro capability.. But I'm thinking of selling it add more lenses for the CL (or at least pay it off 😎).   Anyone else face this situation?    BTW, with all that's going on in the world at this time, I'm fully aware that this is no big deal, but it keeps my mind off the other cataclysmic issues  we're experiencing.  All opinions welcome, any recommendation for lenses?...thanks.  I am currently waiting for arrival of the TTArtisan 35mm F1.4 lens to ship.  Be Well everyone.
    • By pdandurand
      Is it possible to set up the Leica Q to be used as a webcam for Zoom and other video conferencing meetings? If so, any suggestions on setting it up?
    • By cboy
      Hi all,
      Is the leica Q square lens hood can be used on the leica X? They seem similiar lens size. Has anyone tried? Im wishing to try as i have a leica X typ 113
       

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
×
×
  • Create New...