Jump to content

90 2.5 Summarit vs. 90 2.8 Elmarit ?


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Hi,

 

I am in the market for a used 90mm M. What are your experiences with those two lenses - which one would you recommend and why?

Used price are somewhat similar...

 

And what about 75mm 2.5 Summarit. I read about some people saying 75 Summarit is brilliant, but at the same time they didn't like 90mm 2.5 Summarit that much.

 

Any help is welcome.

 

Thanks / Alex

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 60
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

The white area on the shutter curtain is where the measuring takes place. Obviously, its size remains fixed w/r to the whole frame and remains wholly independent of the focal length. The M does the same in "classic" mode.   Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!

Wow - interesting discussion about metering and contrast concepts here ;-)   … just came back from a weeks trip - didn't bring a 90 Elmarit-M but decided to take the tiny 90/4 Macro along.   When it comes to contrast of all the 90mm lenses I have used on the M, the latest 90 f2.8 Elmarit-M certainly is among the high contrast lenses made by Leica in 90mm.   It is though (and that is important to me) NOT one of the latest, contemporary high contrast lenses as the 28/2.8 ASPH, 50/1.4 ASPH or

The "thin" Tele-Elmarit 90/2.8 is still the winner (225g).

Posted Images

The Summarit 75 new and old is a six element design, and the Summarit 90 new and old is a five element design. The Summarit 75/2.5 has a slightly MTF than the Summarit 90.

 

I've not used a Summarit 90 so can't say much about it. I have the Summarit 75 and find it excellent.

 

I have used also an old 90/4 Elmar-C and have now a Summicron 90 pre-Asph that seems good so far. Not had much time to use it.

 

In essence I think it's impossible to go wrong among the modern 75mm and 90mm lenses from Leica. Choose the focal length you prefer and look at rendering characteristcs and of course price.

Link to post
Share on other sites

As stated, it comes down to which lens you get a better deal.

 

Personally I dislike the rubber and screw in hood on the Summarit.

I mostly use these lenses without hood but appreciate the slide hood of the Elmarit and Summicron, as you can flick them out easy enough if you want to opposed to fiddle with another item in your camera bag.

 

For the same money spent, I would also consider the latest E55 pre ASPH 90mm Summicron in the bunch.

It seems that you can get this lens from time to time for similar money.

 

It is not that heavier and that bigger than the 90 Elmarit-M, performs very, very similar from f2.8 on but offers f2 if you want to.

Only downside is it's E55 filter size if that matters to you.

 

When buying either Elmarit-M or pre ASPH Summicron, buy hands on from a dealer or a person you know or figure in the cost for calibration/ coding depending on your needs.

 

I have seen many of these lenses not perform as they could on digital bodies and have had seen my E55 Summicron completely transformed into a great performing lens through calibration while before it ever so slightly mis-focussed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had the latest Elmarit-M and while it was a great lens, I found that the pre-ASPH Summicron (final e55 filter version) was not much bigger or heavier, performed with near equality from f/2.8 down (except in the very near range when f/4-5.6 was needed for optimal sharpness across the entire field), and gave me a very pleasant rendering @ f/2 for portraiture.

 

I also have both fat and thin T-E's, of which the latter is my prefered for traveling.

 

If I were looking for the best bang for the buck in a 90 I would consider the CV f/3.5 APO-Lanthar ahead of a Summarit. Half a stop slower but a third or so of the cost. I had one, it was a fantastic lens.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I haven't direct experience with Summarit 90, but have the 75 and the last Elmarit M 90 :

- Both are superb modern lenses of very high sharpness even wide open, with the Summarit a bit more contrasty on colors

- The Elmarit is HEAVY (I have the chrome, btw), the Summarit is pocketable (even with the hood mounted reversed, which by the other side is a bit annoying in usage)

- I had a mech problem with the Summarit... after 2 years, the front part became loose... affecting focusing... fixed easily by a lab, at little cost.. the Elmarit is definitely a more solid built.

- The top in size is still my old Tele Elmarit "dwarf"...

delicious lens which still renders very well from f4 on.
Link to post
Share on other sites

I have the 75mm f/2.5 Summarit and a late 90mm Elmarit-M. Both are superb; the 75mm gets more use. I keep the hood attached and capped. When travelling light, I will reverse the lens hood on the 75mm, again capped for more compact stowage. My recommendation is to handle both if possible. Most good Leica dealers should be able to help you decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just to mention: I am a huge fan of the Leica 90/4 Macro-Elmar-M - it is one stop slower than the Elmarit (1 1/2 stops slower than the Summarit), sells second hand for almost twice the cost of a second hand Elmarit-M, is the smallest and lightest of the bunch and has incredible image quality, punching way above it's weight.

 

This lens and a 90 Summicron are the two 90mm lenses one would ideally have.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...

I had the Elmarit 90 (last version, 11807) but was disappointed by its color rendering. This is discussed in other threads, were other folks have different opinions.

 

Didn't bother trying the Summarit 90/2.5 because I didn't like the build quality.

 

I bought the 90/2 APO and was disappointed at portrait distance (for the money).

 

Then I finally "downgraded" to the 75/2 APO, and never looked back.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 90mm f/2.8 Elmarit-M is an extremely fine lens. I had one, stupidly sold it and have bought another copy. This one is here to stay. Optically it delivers as much as I could wish for. I've used a loaner 75 Summait - another excellent lens and no doubt the 90mm Summarit is too. All I can say is that I can fully recommend the Elmarit-M with no qualms whatsoever.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Yes but the superb Macro-Elmar is only f/4. I still miss a modern 90/2.8 the same size (62mm) as the "thin" Tele-Elmarit personally. I don't hold my breath though as the Summarit (66.5mm) is not much taller.

 

But the diminutive size and weight may well add 1/2 to1 stop in ease of hand-holdability.

for DOF control that may be a different matter but the Bokeh of the 4.0/Macro Elmar at 4.0 is very nice and controllable.

 

4.0/90 Macro Elmar 230gm (320gm chrome)

2.8/90 Elmar-M 410gm black (510gm chrome)

2.4/90 Summarit 346gm

2.5/90 Summarit 360gm

2.0/90 APO-Summicron 660gm

Edited by MarkP
Link to post
Share on other sites
The "thin" Tele-Elmarit 90/2.8 is still the winner (225g).

 

And this was the reason I looked for one before buying the Elmarit-M. But I also had read about the 'fungus' issue with (I think it was) the last element(s) in the thin T-E. That put me off it. After getting a pristine Elmarit-M I read (here maybe) that Leica fixed that problem after serial number <whatever>. I believe Puts says the Elmarit-M is sharper than the T-E but I doubt I'd notice with hand-held Tri-X or Portra. And, while you can put the Elmarit-M in a coat pocket, you will definitely not forget it's there.

 

s-a

Link to post
Share on other sites
Hi,

 

I am in the market for a used 90mm M. What are your experiences with those two lenses - which one would you recommend and why?

Used price are somewhat similar...

 

And what about 75mm 2.5 Summarit. I read about some people saying 75 Summarit is brilliant, but at the same time they didn't like 90mm 2.5 Summarit that much.

 

The 90mm Elmarit-M is one of the Leica's superb character lenses (another would be the 50mm Summilux ASPH) and it may be they will never make another as good because the digital user seems to require a large amount of contrast before they believe a lens meets their standards. Not that the Elmarit-M is soft or doesn't have contrast. The tonal transition is smoother than almost any other Leica lens whether on film or on a sensor which makes it ideal for portraits etc., but a hard nosed street photographer my find they need to add some edge contrast for the gritty reality they seek.

 

Instead of the 75mm Summarit you could look at the much cheaper CV 75mm f/2.5 Heliar. Explore Sean Reid's test of the two lenses and you may wonder why the Leica is so much more expensive.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites
And this was the reason I looked for one before buying the Elmarit-M. But I also had read about the 'fungus' issue with (I think it was) the last element(s) in the thin T-E. [...]

My "thin" T-E has no fungus issue but flares much more than my latest Elmarit. Great little lens though. Was always in my bag since the eighties. I prefer the Macro-Elmar now but i miss the faster aperture of the T-E.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Julius Yls
      Sharing my short blog about taking Leica ME and Elmarit 28mm across Arctic circle in the middle of winter. Hope you all enjoy it 
      https://juliusyls.com/blog/2020/12/15/across-arctic-circle-with-28mm-elmarit

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By Peter K
      I have a question about choosing the right 28 mm M lens for landscape photography. If it has been asked in other posts already, I apologise in advance.
      Background
      I have decided to buy a 28mm for my M240. It will be used for landscape photography almost exclusively.
      For the first time in my life, I am leaning towards an Elmarit ASPH. However, I always have this nagging inner voice telling me, that Summilux and Summicron are the only ways to go no matter the situation.
      So before buying, I want to make sure that I will not be compromising on any key aspects important to me with an Elmarit. And since I live in a place where trying different lenses before buying is not an easy alternative, I turn to all you skilled Leica experts in here for advice.
      My needs
      I will be shooting at apertures between f/8 - f/11 most of the time. And I will only rarely be focusing on objects very close. So I am not that concerned about bokeh (which I guess is not that relevant for a wide-angle lens anyway).
      The same thing goes for color rendering, since I’m shooting digital and will be postprocessing the RAW files anyway.
      However, I am very interested in achieving good sharpness from corner to corner. And I am also concerned about the handling of lens flare.
      Question
      Do you think the Elmarit ASPH will be the right choice for my purpose? Or will the 28mm Cron or Lux in any of their incarnations perform noticeably better under the above circumstances?
      Reading lots of reviews, both the Cron and the Lux obviously outperforms the Elmarit for low light situations. But will there be differences in image quality, sharpness and flare handling when stopping down to f/8 - f/11?
      Any input will be much appreciated. Thanks!
      - Peter.
    • By robotography
      Hi all,
      a while ago I've bought a used Elmarit-M 90mm (latest version) for which I found a few days ago by accident that the aperture blades do not fully disappear when the lens is used wide open. Consequently, the bokeh balls aren't circular, but have a more "saw blade"-like shape. If I turn the aperture ring beyond 2.8, which is possible by a tiny bit, the blades retract a bit more, but never completely (cp. attached images). 
      As I wasn't sure whether this is by design or a defect, I have contacted Leica Support and they tell me that this is the normal behaviour, but offer a CLA for the lens nonetheless.
      Could any other owner please check with his or her lens?
      Thanks in advance,
      Rolf

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By LCL999
      Something I consider to be a glaring omission from Leica's current M-lens line-up is a light, compact, 35mm lens. Or am I missing something? F2.8 would be quite adequate considering the high ISOs available on the M10. The target market would be those for whom minimum size and weight is a major actor, plus those seeking a lower cost entry into the world of Leica M.
      As it is, Voigtlander offer just such a lens, though the reviews are mixed.
      I assume such a lens would be called an Elmarit, as the code seems to be
      Elmar -f4.0
      Elmarit f2.8
      -chron f2.0
      -lux f1.4 or faster.
      Any comments as to when such a beast might become available, or should I just go and buy the Voigtlander?
×
×
  • Create New...