jaapv Posted November 7, 2014 Share #61 Â Posted November 7, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) You might try reading SR's review for the answer... Secondly, the term "sharp" in optics is a subjective one and not quantifiable. Resolution? Microcontrast? Macrocontrast? etc... If we get into such assessments I already had one. In the shots I took with it it had a better clarity and transparency. IMO, not in numbers.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted November 7, 2014 Posted November 7, 2014 Hi jaapv, Take a look here Zeiss ZM 35mm f/1.4 Distagon. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Ivar B Posted November 7, 2014 Share #62 Â Posted November 7, 2014 The problem that Sean Reid points out is that even the 35mm FLE is not entirely free from focus shift, while the Zeiss lens is. This became very apparent in his studio shots, but in practice they may be less noticeable. This was not the only area where Zeiss demonstrated superiority, though. Â I don`t want to undermine Seans business by replicating his report, but his final words are that "The Distagon is an exceptional lens - one of the best I`ve yet tested from Zeiss or any other maker." Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SteveYork Posted November 7, 2014 Share #63 Â Posted November 7, 2014 If Leica produced this lens all you guys would be slobbering over it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wattsy Posted November 7, 2014 Share #64 Â Posted November 7, 2014 If Leica produced this lens all you guys would be slobbering over it. Â I think most of us who use a 35 are slobbering over it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.