MarkP Posted September 21, 2014 Share #1 Â Posted September 21, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Well I 've had a 2.8/25 ZM Biogon which initially had little use, but more so lately - a technically impressive lens. Anyhow I had the opportunity of buying a less than one year old mint 3.4/25 Elmar-M (with papers/box, receipt, etc). for an obscenely good price so I did. It seemed like it was a brand new lens as I opened it up! Â My thoughts were that I'd keep which ever lens was better and if that happened to be the Biogon I'd not lose money on the transaction - may even make some as the Elmar was such a good price. Â I had to test around the house as I'm still grounded after surgery on my ankle/foot. Â The Elmarit had a clear edge on sharpness/resolution at all comparable apertures, and colour rendition was remarkably similar compared to the other Zeiss/Leica comparisons I've done on 50 & 85/90mm lenses. Â I'm less fussed about the 0.7 of a stop difference between the lenses. Â The difference between 24 and 25mm is obvious on my computer screen but in real life I think would make little difference. On the M240, comparing the 24mm OVF for the D-Lux 4 with live-view the OVF was remarkably accurate (just shows a bit less of the top of the image). Â Â So the 2.8/25 Zm Biogon will go up for sale. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 21, 2014 Posted September 21, 2014 Hi MarkP, Take a look here Leica 3.8/24 mm Elmar-M and the 2.8/25 ZM Biogon. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Joakim Posted September 21, 2014 Share #2 Â Posted September 21, 2014 The Elmar is hard to beat, good call in my opinion. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted September 21, 2014 Author Share #3 Â Posted September 21, 2014 Well that was also my experience with the 4.5/21 ZM C-Biogon. Again, a great lens: compact, good ergonomics, relatively cheap, minimal distortion, excellent sharpness/resolution, less than a stop slower than the SEM. At least until I put it up against my new 3.4/21 SEM - the 21 Zeiss was also sold, red edging being the other issue. Having said that, it is spectacular performance for less than a third the price of the 21 SEM. This also applies to the 2.8/25 ZM! Â The 1/3 stop intervals on the aperture ring are also a pain when the Leica lenses and shutter-speeds are 1/2 stop intervals. Can forget sometimes when working quickly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill W Posted September 22, 2014 Share #4 Â Posted September 22, 2014 I acquired my 24 Elmar-M as a used lens about two years ago for a VERY reasonable price. It is a great lens, very compact and very sharp from my perspective. It had not been used as far as I could tell. The 24 is sort of a love hate focal length. I had a previous 24 and sold it but hated that I did. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.