Jump to content
jaapv

Leica T/TL/TL2 - the Image thread

Recommended Posts

Crop spraying this morning ..... with 100% detail crop....

 

Amazing detailing that 100% crop!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is June in southern California and the period we call June Gloom. The marine layer comes in off the Pacific in the evening and hangs over us until late in the morning or early afternoon. It is nice and sunny until the marine layer comes back in the late afternoon. Being Friday we have happy hour at the Fisherman's restaurant and the start of the summer Friday night concert series at the beach. A few shots from this evening.

 

I call these next two fishing. Everyone in the frame is fishing for something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A little of the entertainment for the evening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
approx half size crop .... 50/2 apo again

 

thigslapper,

 

have you noticed if the T's DNGs keep exhibiting purple fringing also with the 50 APO?

 

Thanks in advance,

Bruno

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

thigslapper,

 

have you noticed if the T's DNGs keep exhibiting purple fringing also with the 50 APO?

 

Thanks in advance,

Bruno

 

No ...... but I have only had both for less than a week ......

 

I have looked in all the usual high contrast areas in the photos I have taken and have seen zero so far ....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
No ...... but I have only had both for less than a week ......

 

I have looked in all the usual high contrast areas in the photos I have taken and have seen zero so far ....

 

Thanks a lot thighslapper, this sounds quite reassuring as it likely means that the purple fringing I've seen plaguing most of the files I could grab did not depend from poor sensor optimization but from the kit zoom being a bottle ass...

 

Cheers,

Bruno

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Great handling of the sunset -- did you need to PP to compress the DR a bit or is this all to the camera's credit? BTW which lens did you use?

 

Thanks. I processed in LR. I don't recall the settings, but there was still latitude left so it wasn't pushed to the limits. Im very pleased with the little camera.

This was the 23mm f2 Lens

 

Manhattan Beach ... I love the light in this picture!

 

Thanks!

Edited by digitalfx

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

If you like classic cars and you like the 50's and 60's you would have enjoyed this show.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's a classic car show without Marilyn Monroe? Brought out the crowds.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Finally, being part of surf city USA you need a classic "Woody" to take your surf board to the beach.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Terrific. Some are from the 50's (such as the '55 Chevy and the '49 or '50 Ford woody), but most of the rest are street rods based on '30s and 40's cars.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I only posted a small fraction of the cars that were there. I took over 50 photos. As to PP, the only PP was to adjust the DNGs down ⅔ stop and recover the over exposed high lights. On the JPGs I just recovered the over exposed highlights. I did discover one strange phenomenon. In the shot with the Marilyn Monroe look-a-like, I exported the JPG and on close examination of the full image at 100%, the boy in the Levi shirt's pants leg had serious chromatic aberration but the DNG did not. It appears that LR removes it from the DNG but it is baked into the JPG. I took the same pair of images into the latest version of Iridient Developer (ID) and noticed that the CA was present in the DNG and JPGs (before turning off lens correction). Then I turned off lens correction and the DNG was actually cleaner and only visible at 200%. It appears that distortion correction introduces some error in the CA processing. Also, in the latest version of ID the apparent overexposure of the DNG files is gone!

 

It seems that a) the lens is not as good as Leica seemed to promote and

there are problems with the PP profiles for LR and ID. Here is a link to the original two files so you can check for yourself.

 

On further review, I am wrong. It too shows the overexposure on DNG files. However, I like the color better.

Edited by barjohn

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

John,

 

thanks for sharing your thoughts and files. I took the liberty to download and examine them.

 

In the jpeg file the CA on the boy's leg is visible but quite unnoticeable as it blends with the pants color.

But the same CA in the same color is visible either in the poles at the right behind the flag and in the arch holding the Ola Vista sign.

 

As a Linux user I grind DNGs in RAWTherapee which has no camera dedicated profile, so it's easy for me to spot shortcomings if any as they're not covered by the software.

No matter applying distortion correction or not, there's a faint trace of CA in the boy's leg. Only this time is more visible as the fringing is purple/magenta and not blue as in the jpeg.

I also see CA in the poles at the right and in the top of the flag pole. In both places fringing is green on the right and magenta on the left, God only knows why.

 

In RAWTherapee intensity of CA depends much on applied color presets. Those which pump the color to give more pop tend to exacerbate the problem. Regrettably enough (for me) RAWTherapee filters to defringe and to remove CA apparently can nothing against the fringing I usually find in T's DNGs. Strangely enough, the same correction filters are very effective on the DNG files produced by my X2 which shares the same sensor of the T.

 

Finally, what seems odd to me is the amount of details that went lost in the jpeg you shared, especially considering that I'm no good at all at PP. Here are two 100% crops. One is from my jpeg originating from your DNG, the other's yours as available in Dropbox. Was this straight ooc?

 

Cheers,

Bruno

Edited by !Nomad64

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Summicron T 1:2 23 ASPH @ f/2

Jpg on camera

 

Thank you for posting a JPG. I often shoot JPG simply because I do not have the time to photoshop every picture I take. The colors look great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Similar Content

    • By nicci78
      After lots of discussion about future of APS-C. How many of you think that the real reason for CL/TL being held back is the lack of native lenses ? 
       
      A little history :
      - 2014 : T was released with two lenses : 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 & 23mm f/2.0
      - 2015 : Then two more with 11-23mm f/3.5-4.5 & 55-135mm f/3.5-4.5
      - 2016 : Leica release the only two made in Germany TL lenses : 35mm f/1.4 & macro 60mm f/2.8
      - 2017 : CL was released with 18mm f/2.8 pancake lens  
      Leica were on a good track, 1 or 2 TL lenses per year. But after 2017 ? Nothing happened at all ! 
      We should have 10 to 14 lenses by now. Not 7. 
       
      Only 1 fast lens. Only a trinity of slow zoom lenses. Only 2 compact prime lenses.
      None of them have OIS. None of the bodies have IBIS. 
      No portrait lens, aka equivalent to fast 85/90mm or 70-200mm f/2.8. 
      No fast wide angle. ex : equivalent to fast 18/21mm. 
      These lens cannot be replaced with any adapted M and R lenses. 
       
      So what’s the problem here ? Leica may think that APS-C line do not sell well enough. So they stop releasing new lenses  ? It is a kind a vicious cercle. But  no new lens = death of the system. 
      Just like they left the S line died by releasing only bare minimum body upgrade and no new lenses for half a decade. 
       
      So what do you think about this situation ? 
    • By kodachrome
      Do L-Mount lens from Sigma or Panasonic work with the original T (typ 701) ?

      I use the camera as a backup to my CL with the variety of TL lenses or adapted lenses. I might be looking into a Panasonic for high res-images. The Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 is a favored lens I'm looking at, but there are others I might look at.
    • By wingedb11
      Don‘t know how others fell. But just saw that there is a new Firmware for the CL but nothing for the TL2 and this since a while. Communications turn primarily around CL. Is the T-series dead?
    • By plasticman
      Mike Johnston at TheOnlinePhotographer blog has been musing about the perfect 'simple' digital camera again, and I can't help thinking that a Leica T(L/2) fits his description perfectly - if only he (and his readers) knew it.
      He acknowledges that Leica is the only camera company embracing photographic simplicity, but the spectre of Leica prices keeps coming back - both in the blog posts and the comments - and the only cameras they seem to acknowledge are the M-series.
      To me, the menu system in the Leica T is the most intuitive and minimal interface that's possible in an advanced digital camera - especially the way that each user can choose their own subset of visible menu items: I have only 4 items in that menu, and regularly only use one of them (the metering type).
      Nowadays the T can be bought for less than a Fuji XE3. You can even pair it with an adapter for non-Leica manual lenses (ie: Olympus OM). Couldn't be simpler or cheaper.
      Incidentally, one of the points being missed in a lot of the comments on TOP's site is the scenario where the user changes a setting on a camera unintentionally. A lot of the commenters say it's easy to just ignore menus and settings they don't understand. But this was one of the problems I persistently had with my X100 - I'd pick it up after a long hiatus and somehow an exposure or other setting had been inadvertently changed, and it would first take me a while to notice, and then usually a long time to fix (hunting through tens of menus). And I'm an app developer, so used to device complexity.
      The T has solved all those problems perfectly.
    • By Carothersbs
      https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1450274-REG/7artisans_photoelectric_a505b_55mm_f1_4_lens_for.html
       
      anyone get a chance to play around with one of these yet?
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use. We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue., Read more about our Privacy Policy