Jump to content
jaapv

Leica T/TL/TL2 - the Image thread

Recommended Posts

Super-Vario-Elmar-T @ 11mm

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

A few shots after having had the camera for three weeks now. Extremely impressed with how sharp the Summicron f/2 is even wide open.

 

London + Stockholm, some PP in Lightroom on all of these:

 

/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8593/16521203372_619493bf73_b.jpg&key=ccc8c8fffd93cf24a5ae440db7f26943f38b79cc13cd2f3265ec1ac106a04122">

 

/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8562/16496244316_1d0a8a3dbd_b.jpg&key=84b9770b22717de740f70f94d3dda805b024ded3d6c50eba3917d8434fd9e7c5">

 

/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7451/16335997589_041d5a49df_b.jpg&key=0d15ad889a21d0ecf878a89e32faca23f321ef46748b639b030dad17094e291d">

 

/applications/core/interface/imageproxy/imageproxy.php?img=https://farm9.staticflickr.com/8635/15926228324_b3483e467f_b.jpg&key=ba32d6903f80f5ada94ec3530191f311a86907ba1af53f9cec432ed9b54d94b3">

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Two shots from Joshua Tree National Park in California. Both taken with the Summicron-T 23mm.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Leica T mount 23mm f2.0

My mirror rare

 

23mm f2.5

Delicious?

 

23mm f2.0

Taipei Night

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, somehow my sad case of Leicaitis has returned, I now own a T, complete with Viso, and M-T adaptor. Why? Can't tell you, but what I see I like.

Better than the X-Vario? Nope, not with my current lens line-up anyway, I find I am missing auto-focus. More so with fllghty 4 year old subjects.

OK, I can hear you all, go buy a T lens. Might do that, but right now it's the 50mm and 28mm Leica M lenses and nothing else.

Taken this afternoon, used the 28mm Elmarit, and shot as a B&W JPEG within the camera. Slight, but minimal, LR processing.

I need to practise more, like Jono suggested.

Gary

Edited by gbealnz

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here are the first images I took using the T and the Summarit 90/2.5. I hope you will enjoy!

Edited by hansdampf23

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not your usual run-of-the-mill T shots, and unlikely to gain any further traction with me either, just too hard. I wrote an essay the day the forum changed, posted a couple of shots, comparing the T and my humble/old Fuji X-E1, for casual astro use.

Unfortunately, (or possibly fortunately), the post got lost in the transition, and I cannot be bothered typing it all out again.

 

However, tonight it is crisp and clear, and while certainly cold, I felt I wanted to try again. Initially I was only looking to muck about with the X-E1, and more to just have some fun. I took a couple of shots of a bright globular cluster, NGC5139, commonly known as "Omega Centaurus" which as I type is all but overhead. I used an old home-built 10" f5 newtonion reflector, in a tube I made from carbon fiber ages ago. It's ugly, but very functional, and the optics are exceptional.

 

With the X-E1, I shot for 30 seconds at ISO800, and was stunned by the amount of detail. I knew then I had to go get the T, despite the lack of "connectivity". With the X-E1, I have a programmable remote, and the camera will do "bulb" easily, I often shoot 5 or even 10 minute exposures.

 

No such luxury with the T unfortunately. No "bulb" to start with, but no remote, either. I cannot use the T app, I have an aged iPad (IOS5), and while my phone is smarter than me, it is Android based, so the app isn't available. I tried my wife's iPhone (with IOS7) and the app installed, but well away from wifi, I couldn't make the two talk to each other so gave up.

 

With the T I simply used the self timer (12 seconds), and used the longest shutter speed available, 30 seconds. I tried ISO1600, and then ISO3200. Both were OK, certainly on the LCD, so I was chuffed.

 

I then slewed across a bit and went to NGC3372, the Eta Carina Nebula. This, along with Omega Cent, is quite bright, so not a hard object to image, but given the limitation of 30 seconds max I was happy when I saw the image on the LCD.

 

Both taken at ISO3200, both 30 second shots, single frames. It is a well established practice to take a quantity of images and "stack" them, with the appropriate software. This reduces the signal to noise ratio and usually gives a cleaner image. In my case, all I was after was "pretty pictures", so one single of each was all I did. They were shot as DNG of course, but also JPEG, not a lot in it between them. CS6 tweaks and downsizing for the forum.

Gary

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By dnease
      I recently purchased a Q2 and subsequently decided to sell my T, T2 and lenses. The equipment is without any scratches or blemishes and works flawlessly.
      I got a quote from Adorama and based on that reasonable offer decided to send them my gear. Now they are reducing their offer by a third after having the equipment in their possession.
      I'm waiting to hear back from someone at Adorama after complaining.
      I'm feeling stuck.
      Any recommendations?
    • By nicci78
      After lots of discussion about future of APS-C. How many of you think that the real reason for CL/TL being held back is the lack of native lenses ? 
       
      A little history :
      - 2014 : T was released with two lenses : 18-56mm f/3.5-5.6 & 23mm f/2.0
      - 2015 : Then two more with 11-23mm f/3.5-4.5 & 55-135mm f/3.5-4.5
      - 2016 : Leica release the only two made in Germany TL lenses : 35mm f/1.4 & macro 60mm f/2.8
      - 2017 : CL was released with 18mm f/2.8 pancake lens  
      Leica were on a good track, 1 or 2 TL lenses per year. But after 2017 ? Nothing happened at all ! 
      We should have 10 to 14 lenses by now. Not 7. 
       
      Only 1 fast lens. Only a trinity of slow zoom lenses. Only 2 compact prime lenses.
      None of them have OIS. None of the bodies have IBIS. 
      No portrait lens, aka equivalent to fast 85/90mm or 70-200mm f/2.8. 
      No fast wide angle. ex : equivalent to fast 18/21mm. 
      These lens cannot be replaced with any adapted M and R lenses. 
       
      So what’s the problem here ? Leica may think that APS-C line do not sell well enough. So they stop releasing new lenses  ? It is a kind a vicious cercle. But  no new lens = death of the system. 
      Just like they left the S line died by releasing only bare minimum body upgrade and no new lenses for half a decade. 
       
      So what do you think about this situation ? 
    • By kodachrome
      Do L-Mount lens from Sigma or Panasonic work with the original T (typ 701) ?

      I use the camera as a backup to my CL with the variety of TL lenses or adapted lenses. I might be looking into a Panasonic for high res-images. The Sigma 24-70 f/2.8 is a favored lens I'm looking at, but there are others I might look at.
    • By wingedb11
      Don‘t know how others fell. But just saw that there is a new Firmware for the CL but nothing for the TL2 and this since a while. Communications turn primarily around CL. Is the T-series dead?
    • By plasticman
      Mike Johnston at TheOnlinePhotographer blog has been musing about the perfect 'simple' digital camera again, and I can't help thinking that a Leica T(L/2) fits his description perfectly - if only he (and his readers) knew it.
      He acknowledges that Leica is the only camera company embracing photographic simplicity, but the spectre of Leica prices keeps coming back - both in the blog posts and the comments - and the only cameras they seem to acknowledge are the M-series.
      To me, the menu system in the Leica T is the most intuitive and minimal interface that's possible in an advanced digital camera - especially the way that each user can choose their own subset of visible menu items: I have only 4 items in that menu, and regularly only use one of them (the metering type).
      Nowadays the T can be bought for less than a Fuji XE3. You can even pair it with an adapter for non-Leica manual lenses (ie: Olympus OM). Couldn't be simpler or cheaper.
      Incidentally, one of the points being missed in a lot of the comments on TOP's site is the scenario where the user changes a setting on a camera unintentionally. A lot of the commenters say it's easy to just ignore menus and settings they don't understand. But this was one of the problems I persistently had with my X100 - I'd pick it up after a long hiatus and somehow an exposure or other setting had been inadvertently changed, and it would first take me a while to notice, and then usually a long time to fix (hunting through tens of menus). And I'm an app developer, so used to device complexity.
      The T has solved all those problems perfectly.
×
×
  • Create New...