MarkP Posted April 25, 2014 Share #21 Â Posted April 25, 2014 Advertisement (gone after registration) Hmmm, Â T + 2.0/23mm Summicron-T + a few accessories or new 2.0/35 Summicron-M + my M240 or Monochrom, Â at what will probably at a similar price . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted April 25, 2014 Posted April 25, 2014 Hi MarkP, Take a look here New 35 Summicron and maybe 28 Summilux?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
adan Posted April 25, 2014 Share #22 Â Posted April 25, 2014 Just a reminder that Leica has been known to change the barrels and cosmetics of lenses without actually changing the optics. Â - Noctilux f/1 - originally had a separate round bayonet lens hood, later the built-in retractable square hood - Summilux 75mm - originally had a separate hood and much thinner barrel (lighter weight, too); then a heavier, thicker barrel with a built-in retractable shade; then a minor revision to reduce weight when final assembly moved from Canada to Solms. - 90 Summicron last pre-ASPH - originally issued with a built-in hood that covered the aperture ring when retracted; later re-engineered with thinner focus/aperture rings, fatter barrel, and a shorter hood to avoid the overlap. Â So that might be an all-new 35 Summicron - or it might be the same old ASPH glass in a new barrel, that updates to the current screw-on metal hood paradigm. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ansel_Adams Posted April 25, 2014 Share #23  Posted April 25, 2014 A better image showing the 'new' 35 and what does look like an f2.8 28mm lens, so no summilux  New version of the Leica 35mm f/2.0 Summicron M lens leaked in press photo? | Leica News & Rumors  Thats a lot better. Thanks. Have just comported it to my V5 and it is identical except the ring where the hood currently clips on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ansel_Adams Posted April 25, 2014 Share #24  Posted April 25, 2014 Some of the M lenses in the background of that picture are wearing unusual "decoration rings"—i. e. those rings screwed on the lens when the screw-on hood is removed, to protect the threads. These protection rings are included with the lens in the case of the Summarit-M lenses (instead of a hood which must be purchased as an extra) and the Summilux-M 35 mm Asph (in addition to the hood which is included). But there are no "decoration rings" included with the 21 mm and 24 mm Summilux, Elmar-M 24 mm, Super-Elmar-M 21 mm Asph, Summicron-M 35 mm Asph, Tri-Elmar-M 16-18-21 mm Asph etc ... still, in the picture above these lenses do wear decoration rings—probably custom-made— which give them unfamiliar appearances.  The 28 mm lens next to the Noctilux is just an older non-asph Elmarit-M.  Yes, I think you nailed it. Thy probably jut put the rings on for aesthetic reasons. The focus of the image being the Leica T after all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berth Posted April 25, 2014 Share #25 Â Posted April 25, 2014 I think the point of the photograph is that the new 'T' can use all of Leica's M lenses, whatever their focal length or maximum aperture, whatever their generation, and that the 'T' is the latest chapter of a storied history. Â That's why their new 'T' lenses are not the end of the story. Don't like them? Don't want auto focus? Don't buy them, plant a Noctilux on it instead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.