Guest Gilgamesh Posted October 21, 2013 Share #1 Â Posted October 21, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) l. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 21, 2013 Posted October 21, 2013 Hi Guest Gilgamesh, Take a look here 90mm f2 with the M240 & f2.. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Lightwrangler Posted October 21, 2013 Share #2 Â Posted October 21, 2013 Sorry, Tim, the link is not working. Â Mike Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gilgamesh Posted October 23, 2013 Share #3 Â Posted October 23, 2013 face 3 | Flickr - Photo Sharing! Â Sorry - I have been busy. This Flickr image is a 100% crop. The DNG file has had no sharpening, no PP, thus it is straight out of the camera. Â I would say that I have the pupil slightly out & the portrait is framed a little above her head down to just below her clavicle. Â What a lens! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted October 23, 2013 Share #4 Â Posted October 23, 2013 OK, so let me get this right...You rant and rave about a good persons photos for being "out of focus" and "lacking in any cohseive look" at 0.95 and then post a soft, and dull photo that you missed focus at f2 and expect anyone to give a shit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gilgamesh Posted October 23, 2013 Share #5 Â Posted October 23, 2013 Congratulations on missing the points! Â Oh, and congratulations on the abusive language, in time you will learn that you will never garner much good will behaving like that in public. Well done you. Â As you bear witness to, and those 50mm f 0.?? lens shots are a fine example, thanks; with these lenses you have to be 100% accurate in your focussing or they fail. Â One difference being that as a head shot, maybe this image passes muster, since the image you are viewing is at 100%, those 50mm shots fall flat immediately, at the very first hurdle. Â The RAW file was posted up, just so you are in no doubt, so people can see how these files come straight out of the camera with this lens and this M, which was mentioned (maybe you missed that too?) but you have failed to comprehend its purpose. Post production can, and does mask mediocrity. Â You have also failed to note that I was completely honest (not being a sycophant) and acknowledge that the subject's pupil is a tad soft. It has clearly passed you by that I posted this up to illustrate just several points: one being the bitingly sharp nature and limited focus at f2 and the nature of the out-of-camera file. Â As I said, "Well Done You". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Posted October 24, 2013 Share #6  Posted October 24, 2013 Congratulations on missing the points! Oh, and congratulations on the abusive language, in time you will learn that you will never garner much good will behaving like that in public. Well done you.  As you bear witness to, and those 50mm f 0.?? lens shots are a fine example, thanks; with these lenses you have to be 100% accurate in your focussing or they fail.  One difference being that as a head shot, maybe this image passes muster, since the image you are viewing is at 100%, those 50mm shots fall flat immediately, at the very first hurdle.  The RAW file was posted up, just so you are in no doubt, so people can see how these files come straight out of the camera with this lens and this M, which was mentioned (maybe you missed that too?) but you have failed to comprehend its purpose. Post production can, and does mask mediocrity.  You have also failed to note that I was completely honest (not being a sycophant) and acknowledge that the subject's pupil is a tad soft. It has clearly passed you by that I posted this up to illustrate just several points: one being the bitingly sharp nature and limited focus at f2 and the nature of the out-of-camera file.  As I said, "Well Done You".  Ambitious defense. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted October 24, 2013 Share #7 Â Posted October 24, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Rick, The point missing you are. Not a defense, but a lecture by Master Yoda this is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paul J Posted October 24, 2013 Share #8  Posted October 24, 2013 Congratulations on missing the points! Oh, and congratulations on the abusive language, in time you will learn that you will never garner much good will behaving like that in public. Well done you.  As you bear witness to, and those 50mm f 0.?? lens shots are a fine example, thanks; with these lenses you have to be 100% accurate in your focussing or they fail.  One difference being that as a head shot, maybe this image passes muster, since the image you are viewing is at 100%, those 50mm shots fall flat immediately, at the very first hurdle.  The RAW file was posted up, just so you are in no doubt, so people can see how these files come straight out of the camera with this lens and this M, which was mentioned (maybe you missed that too?) but you have failed to comprehend its purpose. Post production can, and does mask mediocrity.  You have also failed to note that I was completely honest (not being a sycophant) and acknowledge that the subject's pupil is a tad soft. It has clearly passed you by that I posted this up to illustrate just several points: one being the bitingly sharp nature and limited focus at f2 and the nature of the out-of-camera file.  As I said, "Well Done You".  What is both puzzling and entertaining, dear Gigglemess, is that it is you who is missing the point, continuing on with your vapid tirade. Funnily enough, I still don't give a shit.  You know that age old advice "just be yourself". That doesn't apply in all instances. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.