stump4545 Posted October 10, 2013 Share #1 Posted October 10, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) are the 50mm and 35mm summarit 2.5 M lenses the best Leica glass at their focal lengths for reducing flare? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted October 10, 2013 Posted October 10, 2013 Hi stump4545, Take a look here 50mm/35mm summarit 2.5 king of flare. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
01af Posted October 10, 2013 Share #2 Posted October 10, 2013 Are the Summarit-M 50 mm and 35 mm 1:2.5 lenses the best Leica glass at their focal lengths for [avoiding] flare? The 35 mm—yes, definitely. The 50 mm—yes, I think so. It is not quite as flare-resistant as the 35 mm ... but still very good and, as far as I can tell, better in this regard than any other Leica 50 mm M lens. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fgcm Posted October 10, 2013 Share #3 Posted October 10, 2013 I agree with Olaf. I own and use both. Franco Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted October 10, 2013 Share #4 Posted October 10, 2013 It's a fair question, just so long as the question of flare is kept in perspective. I agree with the above, both Summarit's are either great or pretty good. But in the context of how often a 50mm Summicron flares, for example, and the added benefits of an extra stop and (I'd say) better overall image quality, then trading one for the other (I'd say) desirability comes down on the side of the Summicron. But there are times when photographers know for sure the lighting they will be working with is very prone to causing flare (for instance theatre or concert photography), in which case go for the Summarit. Just don't read overly critical opinions and think the Summicron flares at the drop of a hat all the time. You can spend a lot of money getting rid of problems that rarely occur, only to regret later. Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump4545 Posted October 11, 2013 Author Share #5 Posted October 11, 2013 is it just me, or does lens flare with black and white digital just look yucky? thanks for all the good info. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
250swb Posted October 11, 2013 Share #6 Posted October 11, 2013 For me it's the same as colour, it depends what aperture was used, so how defined the flare is, and how you deal with it in pp. If it accidentally happens on a photo worthy of working on my plan would be to make a bold statement and not try to hide it, or clone it out altogether. Sometimes it doesn't work out because it spoils the composition, or it is just a soft veiling flare that doesn't work, but overall there are many more things that can go wrong before flare makes an intrinsically good photo fit only for the bin. Steve Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump4545 Posted October 15, 2013 Author Share #7 Posted October 15, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) does the Leica hood for the 35/50mm summarit 2.5 reduce the chances of flare? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobey bilek Posted October 15, 2013 Share #8 Posted October 15, 2013 does the Leica hood for the 35/50mm summarit 2.5 reduce the chances of flare? That is the primary reason for them to exist. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump4545 Posted October 15, 2013 Author Share #9 Posted October 15, 2013 True Tony. I just heard that the 35mm summarit are so good at suppressing flare that the hoods are more for protecting the front element from scratches. and I am also trying to shoot as small and discrete as possible. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump4545 Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share #10 Posted October 16, 2013 it has been said in a lot of threads that Leica hoods are ineffective. would that statement also be true with the 35mm summarit 2.5 hood? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted October 16, 2013 Share #11 Posted October 16, 2013 It has been said in a lot of threads that Leica hoods are ineffective. Please don't contort what has been said! It's the built-in retractable hoods that are patheticly ineffective. The external clamp-on or screw-on Leica hoods usually are fine, and so are those for the Summarit-M lenses. Which is ironic because the Summarits are so flare-resistant they can often get away without hoods ... while other lenses which urgently need an effective hood only got a useless built-in one. Still it's a good idea to use a hood also on a Summarit because (1) even low-flare lenses are not 100 % flare-free, and (2) hoods also provide mechanical protection for the front element against bumps, strokes, and fingerprints. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump4545 Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share #12 Posted October 16, 2013 are 3rd party hoods better since they don't wiggle around on the 35mm summarit? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirkB17 Posted October 16, 2013 Share #13 Posted October 16, 2013 I own and use a 35 Summarit regularly. Nothing is “wiggling” around. For me it is just plain perfect. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
stump4545 Posted October 16, 2013 Author Share #14 Posted October 16, 2013 Dirk, doesnt your Leica lens hood not lock into place? that is the way it is on my 35mm summarit 2.5. i thought it was a design flaw of the 35mm summarit. not true? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomB_tx Posted October 17, 2013 Share #15 Posted October 17, 2013 The hood on my 35 Summarit doesn't really "lock" - but tightens just as it screws to the stop, with enough friction that is is secure. No wiggle, and is hasn't tended to come loose. Good design. Now when I bought it used, the hood and whole front body would wiggle, because the retaining ring on at the back that secures the optical unit had loosened. I tightened it, and it has been fine since. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.