Ulev Posted September 23, 2013 Share #41 Â Posted September 23, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Why do I prefer a 75 Summicron over a 75 summarit ? Â The minimum focus distance ( 70cm vs 90cm) does make a big difference ! And yes, you could crop, but I prefer to take my pictures in-camera as much as possible. Â Â And nice to use it in combination with a 35 summicron, both f2 wide open. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 23, 2013 Posted September 23, 2013 Hi Ulev, Take a look here Do We need fast and asph lenses with the MM?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
tom0511 Posted September 23, 2013 Share #42 Â Posted September 23, 2013 I have never been disappointed by 35,50,75 Summarits. However I still believe the 35FLE, 50 Summilux and 75 Summicron can produce images with a "clarity" which I dont see in the Summarit images. I sold my 75 Summarit, but I kept the 35 and 50 Summarits because sometimes I like the small size. I would say it is a matter of taste - but one can clearly see differences. In case of the 35mm focal lengths the 35 Summilux FLE also seems to show better corner performance (not saying te Summarit would be bad in this regard but my FLE is better than my Summarit). Regarding speed of the lenses...I use f1.4 very seldom because I find the DOF too shallow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
aesop Posted September 23, 2013 Share #43 Â Posted September 23, 2013 under certain light conditions yes. this picture pushed the MM to its max:ISO 10.000 Summilux 35 FLE f;1,4 1/30 Â Â Â ...now this is my personal understanding of M 'territory'. Surreptitious low-light magic. Outstanding. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted September 23, 2013 Share #44 Â Posted September 23, 2013 My favorite lens, period. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.