Jump to content

Elmar 3.8/24 -Serial number


pedaes

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Can I ask those with this lens to share some information,please? I have just received a new lens from a UK main dealer with a serial number (4 087 xxx) that dates the lens to 2009 in all the literature (ie 4 years old). The lens is certainly unused, but my inclination is to return it unless I get a very credible explanation, in the knowledge that all lens were in very short supply until recently. Would members with this lens please share their serial numbers, especially anyone who has purchased this year. Thanks.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yes i would have said 2009 as well but the 24/3.8 # 4087862 would be from 2012 according to Summilux.net.

Perhaps 2012 is the year of purchase though.

FWIW

Edit: My 24/3.8 # 40826** has been bought new in 2009. The Leica price was 1800 EUR VAT included then. Now 2100 EUR if i'm not wrong.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Can I ask those with this lens to share some information,please? I have just received a new lens from a UK main dealer with a serial number (4 087 xxx) that dates the lens to 2009 in all the literature (ie 4 years old). The lens is certainly unused, but my inclination is to return it unless I get a very credible explanation, in the knowledge that all lens were in very short supply until recently. Would members with this lens please share their serial numbers, especially anyone who has purchased this year. Thanks.

 

My Elmar 24mm, which is just wonderful in all respects, is 4087xxx. I ordered it in March 2012 while I was testing a slightly older piece. The lens came from Leica NJ (USA) at the middle of March 2012.

 

I would guess that your lens is from the same era as mine, and if it is as good, :), you should definitely hold onto it. And I am not sure how often Leica makes 24 Elmar, given that it is one of their best performers but least sexy.... People buy it to shoot it, not just to have it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't lens numbering similar to the bodies, they have a batch of numbers assigned (in this case to a lens type) and these are chosen in no particular order? It means lenses can be built by individuals without having to keep up with their colleagues, and lenses can leapfrog each other as they are tested and perhaps re-calibrated without the whole production line being held up so they can come out of the factory in strict order. I would have thought the inspection tag if it is dated was a more accurate way to determine age than serial number's, which will only make sense after the lens has gone out of production and after much research.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they are built in batches so any lens, especially the lower-volume selling ones, may well have been sitting in the factory for quite a while. Don't worry, Leica will keep lenses that spoil easily in the fridge to extend the sell-by date :p

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

My Elmar 24mm, which is just wonderful in all respects, is 4087xxx. I ordered it in March 2012 while I was testing a slightly older piece. The lens came from Leica NJ (USA) at the middle of March 2012.

 

I just checked and mine is 4087* as well, picked up in April 2012. It is a lovely lens, have fun with it! Just make sure it is evenly sharp (centered), the first I tried (three were in store) was a little off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they are built in batches so any lens, especially the lower-volume selling ones, may well have been sitting in the factory for quite a while. Don't worry, Leica will keep lenses that spoil easily in the fridge to extend the sell-by date :p

 

Jaap, thank you so much for clearing up this important point. I have been fighting a terrible case of Noct 0.95-induced GAS and recently became worried that if I waited too long I might wind up with a spoiled lens. You have put that worry to rest, so now I will need to invent another one.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Mine is 4081xxxx and from 2009. It's a wonderful lens, one of, if not the, sharpest 24mm lenses ever made! Small, light weight and just stunning performance!! I love it! I've used mine extensively on the M8 which is perfect since you don't need a viewfinder (the M8 is framed for it). It's a wonderful combination!

Link to post
Share on other sites

And they are built in batches so any lens, especially the lower-volume selling ones, may well have been sitting in the factory for quite a while. Don't worry, Leica will keep lenses that spoil easily in the fridge to extend the sell-by date :p

 

Numbers given for certain batches of lens types do not necessarily mean that the lower number is the earlier built lens.

 

It may happen that they give a sequel of numbers for 100 lenses, but then they decide to build other lenses first and give them later numbers.

 

So numbers just give you an idea, when a lens was made, but no guarantee for exactness.

If someone buys a new lens he should find a small card which states that the lens was controlled and passed. As far as I remember this card shows a date, though I may be wrong - being away from my lens boxes. If it has a date, this should be much more precise for the time of production than any numbering.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Numbers given for certain batches of lens types do not necessarily mean that the lower number is the earlier built lens.

 

It may happen that they give a sequel of numbers for 100 lenses, but then they decide to build other lenses first and give them later numbers.

 

So numbers just give you an idea, when a lens was made, but no guarantee for exactness.

If someone buys a new lens he should find a small card which states that the lens was controlled and passed. As far as I remember this card shows a date, though I may be wrong - being away from my lens boxes. If it has a date, this should be much more precise for the time of production than any numbering.

 

Unfortunately, the Inspection Card is signed, but not dated - for the obvious reasons discussed here I guess.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...