BrendanD Posted August 24, 2013 Share #21 Posted August 24, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Yes.... Brillant!! I can delete LR now Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted August 24, 2013 Posted August 24, 2013 Hi BrendanD, Take a look here Apple's Aperture now supports MM & M imports :). I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
otto.f Posted August 27, 2013 Share #22 Posted August 27, 2013 [quote=chrism;2488831 I do like the real blacks I get with Aperture Chris ? In LR5 equally possible in my view Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berlinman Posted August 27, 2013 Share #23 Posted August 27, 2013 I was brave enough :-) For my pictures (M240) it works very well. The colors - especially red - are much better ! The problems with pictures with direct sun, wich some people had reported, are gone also. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrism Posted August 27, 2013 Share #24 Posted August 27, 2013 ? In LR5 equally possible in my view Possibly true, but I find that when I use LR I have to darken the screen to about halfway (using a MacBookPro) and then adjust exposure or brightness in LR for the print to match the screen. Yes, the screen is calibrated, and I use proper printer profiles. People often complain about the brightness of Mac screens, but I find with Aperture I simply print and the output matches the screen. It might just be that Apple are using some of the same undocumented system hooks that Windows was famous for in its early days, giving their software an unfair advantage. Otherwise I like using LR, and agree it is more powerful than Aperture in terms of possible adjustments. Then again, if Adobe make it part of the 'Creative Cloud' I would hate that and would have to get rid of it completely. Chris Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
otto.f Posted August 28, 2013 Share #25 Posted August 28, 2013 Thanks Chris I'll try that out. I do not use LR myself btw. Perfectly happy with C1 even with Monochrome. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
erudolph Posted August 30, 2013 Share #26 Posted August 30, 2013 Possibly true, but I find that when I use LR I have to darken the screen to about halfway (using a MacBookPro) and then adjust exposure or brightness in LR for the print to match the screen. Yes, the screen is calibrated, and I use proper printer profiles. People often complain about the brightness of Mac screens, but I find with Aperture I simply print and the output matches the screen. It might just be that Apple are using some of the same undocumented system hooks that Windows was famous for in its early days, giving their software an unfair advantage. Otherwise I like using LR, and agree it is more powerful than Aperture in terms of possible adjustments. Then again, if Adobe make it part of the 'Creative Cloud' I would hate that and would have to get rid of it completely. Chris That's pretty interesting Chris. I print from the ImagePrint application, which is quite wysiwyg with a calibrated monitor, so print matching to screen is not a problem. But when I compared the image's appearance in LightRoom it is, as you say, brighter. I then compared the appearance of a Monochrom file opened in the current versions of Capture One, Aperture and Lightroom. There are some differences. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Marct40 Posted December 10, 2013 Share #27 Posted December 10, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am an aperture user and was wondering if anyone has heard when v4.0 will be available, I heard rumours that it would be this year when the Mac Pro becomes available but it's a guess Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrism Posted December 14, 2013 Share #28 Posted December 14, 2013 Rumours only, so far, I'm afraid. Chris Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.