Jump to content

Nocticron


rramesh

Recommended Posts

Why?

 

Undoubtedly it will be a fine lens if the m4/3 Summilux is anything to go by, but m4/3 doesn't really need fast lenses because it has image stabilisation and they have pretty much sorted out the problems with noise at high ISO with new sensor technology (both Olympus and their Sony sensors, and Panasonic using their own). Except, with m4/3 the DOF is double that of a FF sensor, so it is difficult to get truly shallow DOF, unless you have a very fast lens, and at 42.5mm (85mm equiv. on a FF) it suggests this is aimed at portraitists.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

So, effectively an 85 mm f/1.2 for my OMD!

What's not to like. I couldn't care less what they call it.

 

Is there such a lens, namely 85/1.2, available in M mount?

 

My assumption is that lens has enough Leica in it that one could post on this forum images produced with it, correct?

And AF presumably.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Equivalent to 85/2.4 FoV and DoF wise. Something like the Summarit-M 90/2.5 perhaps.

 

 

Thanks.

I agree with you on the 85/2.4 DoF wise.

FoV doesn't depend on aperture, or does it?

Light sensitivity wise though 85/1.2, right?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Which would be worst, Crepusculux or Nocticron?

 

Don't go out after dark, the Nocticron will get you!

 

The Crepusculux patrols deserted beaches and mountain peaks at dusk. It will get you before you reach the Summarit.

 

Also beware of the T-Summarex, it's a monster!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I had to have my Crepusculux removed a while back

I had Crepusculuxitis and they performed a Crepuscluximy on me.

 

It was painful, but I no longer have Noctricons-

 

Life is good!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Undoubtedly it will be a fine lens if the m4/3 Summilux is anything to go by, but m4/3 doesn't really need fast lenses because it has image stabilisation and they have pretty much sorted out the problems with noise at high ISO with new sensor technology

On the contrary, Micro FourThirds does need fast lenses since DoF-wise they are at a disadvantage compared to both 35 mm (2 f-stops) and APS-C (1 f-stop). From a DoF perspective the Nocticron is more like a Summarit.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On the contrary, Micro FourThirds does need fast lenses since DoF-wise they are at a disadvantage compared to both 35 mm (2 f-stops) and APS-C (1 f-stop). From a DoF perspective the Nocticron is more like a Summarit.

 

Interesting that you cut off the second half of 250swb's post in your quote in order to make, essentially, the same point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...