Ecaton Posted September 15, 2013 Share #101 Â Posted September 15, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Today, it will be the ZM 50 Sonnar. Tomorrow, I don`t know yet. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted September 15, 2013 Posted September 15, 2013 Hi Ecaton, Take a look here perfect lens kit. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
deliciouspizza Posted September 15, 2013 Share #102 Â Posted September 15, 2013 I'm about to leave on a long trip to NYC and I just picked up a 90 APO 'Cron thinking that I'd travel with this kit: Â -21mm f3.4 Super-Elmar -50mm f2 Summicron APO -90mm f2 Summicron APO Â But the 90mm had some considerable focus shift and even when it didn't I had trouble getting focus at all (I haven't used a lens longer than 50mm+ in a long time, granted). Plus, I don't like the weight and size so I'm returning it. So, I'm going with this kit: Â -21mm f3.4 Super-Elmar -35mm f1.4 Summilux FLE -50mm f2 Summicron APO Â One wide, one for low light and one for everything else. I use the 50 most. I have the Noctilux .95 and 50 Summilux Asph too and I love those lenses, especially the 50 Lux, but I really don't enjoy traveling with tons of lenses. I don't like carrying too much expensive stuff but most importantly I don't like constantly thinking about gear when I'm taking pictures. Â I really never travel with more than three lenses and I hardly ever go out with more than one lens. It's hard enough to stay focused on taking good pics without having to constantly second guess yourself about whether or not you're using the right lens. Maybe it's me, but when I have my 50 on my camera and a 21 in my bag all I can think about is shots that would look cool with my 21. Â Ultimately, you should pick lenses that fit your style. I used to take a lot of wide open shots, with shallow DOF, but now I shoot mostly at f5.6/8. That's why I don't use the Lux or Noctilux much anymore, sadly. And you should be practical. Constantly stopping to change lenses isn't really practical, IMO. Keep it simple, stupid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted September 15, 2013 Share #103 Â Posted September 15, 2013 ...-90mm f2 Summicron APOBut the 90mm had some considerable focus shift... Never got focus shift with mine. I guess your lens needs some calibration. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stealth3kpl Posted September 15, 2013 Share #104 Â Posted September 15, 2013 So, I'm going with this kit:Â -21mm f3.4 Super-Elmar -35mm f1.4 Summilux FLE -50mm f2 Summicron APO Â . Â That's what I would've suggested instead of the former kit Pete Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
semi-ambivalent Posted September 15, 2013 Share #105 Â Posted September 15, 2013 But the 90mm had some considerable focus shift and even when it didn't I had trouble getting focus at all (I haven't used a lens longer than 50mm+ in a long time, granted). Plus, I don't like the weight and size so I'm returning it. Back in my Nikon Days, as well as now, I still find that I use 100mm very rarely, but when I do use it it is the best choice. That's why, after a series of 105s, I made sure to get a 90 Elmarit M. Nothing's changed in my usage but it's (almost) small enough not to be a hinderance if carried but unused. One wide, one for low light and one for everything else. I use the 50 most. Funny, that. In the past the SLR world considered them so boring... Ultimately, you should pick lenses that fit your style. The truest path, but often the hardest; I am little better than a crow, attracted to the shiney, but finances keep me in check. Constantly stopping to change lenses isn't really practical, IMO. That's why they'll sell you a 2nd body. Â The buildings in NYC have a certain sameness that makes them stack up well with teles. Perhaps in the future a 90 Tele- or M Elmarit. The former is very carry-able, the latter avoids the rear element separation issue sometimes found in the older 90s. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deliciouspizza Posted September 15, 2013 Share #106 Â Posted September 15, 2013 Â That's why they'll sell you a 2nd body. Â That is a road I don't want to go down lol. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted September 16, 2013 Share #107 Â Posted September 16, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) That is a road I don't want to go down lol. Â The best 3 lens kit is with 3 bodies, 21, 35, 50 and 90 for the fourth body. Just joking about the fourth body. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tanks Posted September 16, 2013 Share #108 Â Posted September 16, 2013 For me, and I will be taking off for 7 weeks in a month, it will be: Â 35 f/2 50 f/1.4 90 f/2 135 f/4 (46mm version) MM, M Â Now, I will, most likely, have 90 or 135 on the M, and 35 or 50 on the MM. Either the 90 or the 135 will stay behind, and whichever is not mounted on the MM will be in my pocket. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deliciouspizza Posted September 16, 2013 Share #109 Â Posted September 16, 2013 The best 3 lens kit is with 3 bodies, 21, 35, 50 and 90 for the fourth body. Just joking about the fourth body. Â I need to stop coming here, you guys are bad influences. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Ansel_Adams Posted September 16, 2013 Share #110 Â Posted September 16, 2013 My perfect kit would be: Â 21 28 35 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
deliciouspizza Posted September 18, 2013 Share #111 Â Posted September 18, 2013 Which of the 50s would you guys take to a wedding? The most obvious choice is the 50 Summilux with that beautiful bokeh. But what about the 50 APO? May not be the most ideal for portraits, but if you're going to shoot at f5.6/8 so you can get more group shots, it would have the highest IQ. Then there's Noctilux, which would create the most surreal images. Â I'm going to a wedding tomorrow, not sure which one to bring. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 18, 2013 Share #112 Â Posted September 18, 2013 Which of the 50s would you guys take to a wedding? ....what about the 50 APO? Â Well, it's fitting for the bride, given its tendency to reveal veil flair. Â Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted September 18, 2013 Share #113 Â Posted September 18, 2013 That's good one, Jeff or should I say Ffej. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted September 18, 2013 Share #114 Â Posted September 18, 2013 You're repeating yourself. Â Jeff Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
friedeye Posted September 18, 2013 Share #115 Â Posted September 18, 2013 deliciouspizza - Â The lux, hands down. And at 5.6/8 it's so close to the apo that it's about pixel counting in the corners. Â I'd actually go for the 35 lux. Weddings are tight. Context is nice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mmx_2 Posted September 18, 2013 Share #116 Â Posted September 18, 2013 SE 24 Lux 35 Â Both small enough to fit in the pocket if my shorts. Perfect for street shots! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted September 18, 2013 Share #117 Â Posted September 18, 2013 deliciouspizza - Â The lux, hands down. And at 5.6/8 it's so close to the apo that it's about pixel counting in the corners. Â I'd actually go for the 35 lux. Weddings are tight. Context is nice. Â Do you own an APO50 to be able to make this comparison? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rramesh Posted September 21, 2013 Share #118 Â Posted September 21, 2013 Off to Turkey in a week with the 21 SEM, 28 Cron and 50 Lux. Maybe the 90 Elmarit-M may come along. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted September 21, 2013 Share #119 Â Posted September 21, 2013 Off to Turkey in a week with the 21 SEM, 28 Cron and 50 Lux. Maybe the 90 Elmarit-M may come along. Â PERFECT Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdlaing Posted September 21, 2013 Share #120 Â Posted September 21, 2013 I think I have hit on it for me. Â MATE WATE 35 f/1.4 50 f/1.4 Â I am covered for 16-50mm in a very few pieces. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.