Jump to content

The new Voigtländer Nokton 1,5/50 aspherical


Urmelchen

Recommended Posts

The shot of the branch with the bright light in the background is quite revealing to me. There are discs as I'd expect but there are also plenty of less bright discs scattered among them, which suggests to me that these are internal reflections from inside the lens. Normally I would expect these to be prevented by the coatings on the elements but that doesn't seem to be the case here so I wonder if there's a coating issue (or perhaps a reflective filter on the lens?).

 

Interestingly there doesn't appear to be much veiling glare and associated loss of contrast so I'm not sure what's going on.

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The shot of the branch with the bright light in the background is quite revealing to me. There are discs as I'd expect but there are also plenty of less bright discs scattered among them, which suggests to me that these are internal reflections from inside the lens. Normally I would expect these to be prevented by the coatings on the elements but that doesn't seem to be the case here so I wonder if there's a coating issue (or perhaps a reflective filter on the lens?).

 

Interestingly there doesn't appear to be much veiling glare and associated loss of contrast so I'm not sure what's going on.

 

Pete.

 

:confused:

 

Perhaps I'm not following you but I think you are referring smaller patches of light. The hotter areas are multiple spectral highlights clustered and layered on each other and or large gaps in the tree leaves. All lenses act like this. Essentially, multiple exposures.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm referring to the many progressively lighter discs that overlay each other 'deeper' into the picture. Since they're getting less and less intense and there appear to be perfect, lighter replicas of many of the bright discs close to them suggests internal reflections to me. I have a number of fast 50's including a 50/1 Noctilux, 50 Summilux asph, 50/1.5 Zeiss Opton Sonnar, 50/1.4 Nikkor Kogaku, and 50/1.5 Nokton v1 and I don't see this particular characteristic from them. Mis-shapen discs in a variety of attitudes as they're coronally truncated yes, but not gradually lightening discs that are perfect replicas of brighter ones.

 

It's just my observation rather than a criticism so please ignore if you wish.

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm referring to the many progressively lighter discs that overlay each other 'deeper' into the picture. Since they're getting less and less intense and there appear to be perfect, lighter replicas of many of the bright discs close to them suggests internal reflections to me.

 

Pete.

 

Hmm - I would say that the various disks of varying intensities that are all about the same size are simply from different-sized "holes" in the leafy background. A smaller "aperture" in the foliage renders as a dimmer - but not significantly smaller - blur circle/cat's-eye.

 

Some places they sort of align, and other places they don't, and that is just a natural semi-random distribution pattern. (The leaves and gaps overall are random, but there may be a "line" of circles when the leaves and gaps are spaced along a tree branch, for example.)

 

What I do notice is that - within a given blur circle, especially the medium-bright ones - there is an ethereal concentric circular "fresnel-lens" pattern.

 

That looks to me more like either a diffraction effect akin to Airy disks...

 

File:Airy disk created by laser beam through pinhole.jpg - Wikimedia Commons

 

...or reflections (classic infinite hall-of-mirrors effect) within the sensor's glass cover plate (although it may be something else entirely). It is definitely something I have seen with other lenses, much more prominently in digital images than with film, and seems to be more pronounced with aspheric or ED lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What I do notice is that - within a given blur circle, especially the medium-bright ones - there is an ethereal concentric circular "fresnel-lens" pattern.

I've used the previous LTM Nokton 50 1.5 for a few years, and a concentric pattern would show up on extremely OOF highlights, like on this "Christmas lights" 100% crop. I've heard speculation that it is caused by the press-forming of the aspheric element, of possibly by the edges of the element.

Except for this issue and a fair amount of "purple fringing" on very high contrast highlights on the M9, I liked the LTM version, and keep it on my M5, where these things don't show up. It is a very sharp lens with perfect focus on my M9. (Note: don't judge sharpness on this example, as it was not focused on these objects.)

I may get the M mount version as well.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Except for this issue and a fair amount of "purple fringing" on very high contrast highlights on the M9, I liked the LTM version, and keep it on my M5, where these things don't show up.

 

These concentric patterns do appear on film as well. I observed similar onion-like patterns in out of focus regions (typically distant light bulbs) with the 35mm Nokton f/1.2 version 1. This was using film (MP).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...