nunnzzzz Posted May 21, 2013 Share #1 Posted May 21, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) I am an avid Landscape Photographer and do a lot of HDR work. What are folks opinions as to the best M lens for Landscape photography? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 21, 2013 Posted May 21, 2013 Hi nunnzzzz, Take a look here Landscape Lens. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
jaapv Posted May 21, 2013 Share #2 Posted May 21, 2013 (edited) Just about any lens, depends on what and how you want to photograph the landscape. Detail and narrow perspective or wide open and billowing clouds, mountains or flat deserts, bold shapes or busy bush and grass, etc? Edited May 21, 2013 by jaapv 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonki-M Posted May 21, 2013 Share #3 Posted May 21, 2013 just pick your focal length, get anything that's Leica or Leitz, set to f4-f8...and take a landscape of your choice 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted May 21, 2013 Share #4 Posted May 21, 2013 What are folks' opinions as to the best M lens for landscape photography? The lens you have on your camera. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted May 21, 2013 Share #5 Posted May 21, 2013 I am an avid Landscape Photographer and do a lot of HDR work. What are folks opinions as to the best M lens for Landscape photography? Well, that depends on what I try to capture. I am using lenses from 14 - 560 mm on various size sensor cameras, FF, APS-C, and MFT. Some of my favorite lenses are Leitz Tele-Elmar 135/4, Leica Summilux-M ASPH 50/1.4, and Leica WATE 16-18-21/4. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ecar Posted May 21, 2013 Share #6 Posted May 21, 2013 Ultra-wide? Wide? Normal? Tele? Suggest you start with the Noctilux 50/0.95 and take it from there. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted May 21, 2013 Share #7 Posted May 21, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Ultra-wide? Wide? Normal? Tele?Suggest you start with the Noctilux 50/0.95 and take it from there. Maybe the new AA 50/2? 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted May 21, 2013 Share #8 Posted May 21, 2013 A weak lens in corners and edges is not the best for landscapes so if you intend to use a 35mm lens for instance, you'd better choose a Biogon 35/2.8 than a Summarit 35/2.5 or a Summicron 35/2 asph than a Biogon 35/2 from this viewpoint. Same for 50mm lenses where the Summarit 50/2.5 is better there than the Summicron 50/2. Now you will hardly see significant differences at f/4 and on actually and personal preferences play an essential role needless to say. To take an example, my favorite 50 for landscapes is the Elmar-M 50/2.8 even if i do know that my Summilux 50/1.4 asph is a better performer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted May 21, 2013 Share #9 Posted May 21, 2013 Mountain Elmar, obviously! 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DirkB17 Posted May 21, 2013 Share #10 Posted May 21, 2013 Mountain Elmar, obviously! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill W Posted May 21, 2013 Share #11 Posted May 21, 2013 Mountain Elmar, obviously! That would be the earley version which had less flair...!!!! Sorry James I could not help myself.....! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
atournas Posted May 21, 2013 Share #12 Posted May 21, 2013 Since you are not very specific about what sort of landscape work you do, let me assume something standard like large coverage and field of depth. The first assumption requires high quality rendition edge to edge; the second, apertures f/22 and smaller. M lenses, particularly the wide-angle ones, usually stop down to f/16 and that aperture is not their premium performance. Well, they are not medium format lenses, right? If I had to choose an M lens for standard landscape shooting, I would go for the 28mm f/2 ASPH but be ready to do some cropping at f/16. I, myself, use the 21mm f/2.8 ASPH and crop, sometimes all the way to an effective 28mm field. Paul Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k-hawinkler Posted May 21, 2013 Share #13 Posted May 21, 2013 Well, in that case one could also use the WATE at 18 mm on a NEX-7. I wonder what the (dis-)advantages of the different approaches would be with regards to IQ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
billo101 Posted May 22, 2013 Share #14 Posted May 22, 2013 Ultra-wide. b Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Marc G. Posted May 22, 2013 Share #15 Posted May 22, 2013 Landscape photography is one of my main targets of photography. Reducing this to 1-2 focal lengths is, mildly put, stupid. I currently use 28-90mm but you could also use 12-135mm. Ultra wides for getting up close and when you absolutely need to get all it for the effect. On the other hand you often need to compress the view, where a short tele shines. My most used focal length is 50 for landscape, as it is for everything. I suggest starting with your favorite focal length. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NZDavid Posted May 22, 2013 Share #16 Posted May 22, 2013 It depends. If you go ultra-wide you may end up with lots of boring foreground. But if you are surrounded by mountains ultra-wide may be just what you need. A longer lens will isolate specific feature of the landscape. 24 and 35 are idea for travel and the 50 is surprisingly versatile. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orient XI Posted May 22, 2013 Share #17 Posted May 22, 2013 Much depends on the landscape itself. I really enjoy photographing the classic landscapes of the American West but I find that I need longer focal length lenses to capture these successfully than would be the case for the more compact landscapes of western Europe. I suppose a modern solution to this problem would be to use an M9 in Europe and an M8 in America; that way you only need one set of lenses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
01af Posted May 22, 2013 Share #18 Posted May 22, 2013 ... for the more compact landscapes of western Europe. In case you're visiting Ireland, make sure to bring a macro lens. It's a small country. 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bill Posted May 22, 2013 Share #19 Posted May 22, 2013 ...and an umbrella... Regards, Bill Sent from another Galaxy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Allsopp Posted May 22, 2013 Share #20 Posted May 22, 2013 I am an avid Landscape Photographer and do a lot of HDR work. What are folks opinions as to the best M lens for Landscape photography? Why do you ask the question and why is it loaded as to the best M lens? Do you assume that the M is the best landscape camera or do you assume we believe the M is the best landscape camera? I am mostly a landscape photographer. My lenses run from a 21mm (sometime used to stitch a pano) to a 300 on a Canon 7D (i.e. 480mm equivalent). In conclusion: The best lens is the one you need to take the picture in question. 4 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now