Mantice Posted May 20, 2013 Share #1 Posted May 20, 2013 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) Hello, just a quick question for those who got an M already! Would you mind let me know the weight of the bottom plate? I'm interesting in getting RRS replacement plate, but since I only do tripod work (on M) less than half of the time I'm not sure if I want to carry extra weight and bulk. The universal B9 plate seems to be a great alternative with the exception of having to carry a wrench in the bag. I'll also post back if I got any new information from RRS! Edited May 20, 2013 by Mantice clearify Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 20, 2013 Posted May 20, 2013 Hi Mantice, Take a look here Weight of Leica M240 bottom plate and RRS replacement plate. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
mjh Posted May 20, 2013 Share #2 Posted May 20, 2013 50 g. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jean-Michel Posted May 21, 2013 Share #3 Posted May 21, 2013 Hi, I purchased the RRS L-plate for my M9 but I only use the bottom plate. It takes no time at all to get used to it. There is no weight difference felt. And it is there for anytime that I wish to use it on a tripod, for instance on those occasions when I want to use my 135 Elmarit. I do not use the 'L' part of the plate -- it is awkward and would only be useful if one where to always use the camera on a tripod. Jean-Michel 2 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted May 21, 2013 Share #4 Posted May 21, 2013 I just carry the RSS Bottom Plate in my kit and use it like the universal plate. I only attach it when needed for a tripod shot. Otherwise I keep the Leica bottom plate on the camera. In this way, its simply the universal plate with a custom fit and twice as fast to install. (+ its tool less) 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantice Posted May 22, 2013 Author Share #5 Posted May 22, 2013 According to RRS it seems to be 3oz, so the weight isn't that much different than the stock plate! There are production models coming up in few weeks so I guess we will have the specification up soon! The only down side is that it adds maximum of 1cm to the overall height of the M240 - but I think the way suggested by digitalfx seems to get the best of both world. I'll be getting one I think! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted May 22, 2013 Share #6 Posted May 22, 2013 According to RRS it seems to be 3oz, so the weight isn't that much different than the stock plate! There are production models coming up in few weeks so I guess we will have the specification up soon! The only down side is that it adds maximum of 1cm to the overall height of the M240 - but I think the way suggested by digitalfx seems to get the best of both world. I'll be getting one I think! if almost double isnt much different Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantice Posted May 22, 2013 Author Share #7 Posted May 22, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) if almost double isnt much different Really? 85g - 50g (which will be removed) = 35g, seems to be the same as the lightest Arca plate out there I do not have brand loyalty and in fact some of their product just miss some of those universal appeal but apparently it is the only company that made a custom "tool-less" one so far. Their tripod are one of the best - no doubt about that~ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted May 22, 2013 Share #8 Posted May 22, 2013 (edited) Really? 85g - 50g (which will be removed) = 35g, seems to be the same as the lightest Arca plate out there I do not have brand loyalty and in fact some of their product just miss some of those universal appeal but apparently it is the only company that made a custom "tool-less" one so far. Their tripod are one of the best - no doubt about that~ Yes, really. I have one on order, ordered first day. Also owned the M9 plate. That doesnt change the fact that its nearly double the weight as the Leica bottom plate AND double the size. Edited May 22, 2013 by digitalfx 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mantice Posted May 22, 2013 Author Share #9 Posted May 22, 2013 Yes, really. I have one on order, ordered first day. Also owned the M9 plate. That doesnt change the fact that its nearly double the weight as the Leica bottom plate AND double the size. you're right - I miss that part... Indeed 85g is still hella heavier than the original Size is something that I feel the same with you - why can't they slim it down?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitalfx Posted May 22, 2013 Share #10 Posted May 22, 2013 you're right - I miss that part... Indeed 85g is still hella heavier than the original Size is something that I feel the same with you - why can't they slim it down?? its just a limitation of the design. The M9 plate was large also. Its still much more convenient than the universal plate and a better fit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now