bruniroquai Posted May 14, 2013 Share #1 Posted May 14, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) That's my main concern... I'm reducing my gear to one camera, two lenses or one lens. I'm planning do a long trip in September, going to Cuba or South India, don't know still. I have a Leica m6 with the 0.85x which I find very pleasant for my 50 summarit 1.5 but I don't know if the 35 cron pre asph IV which I have is much better than the 40 C, or is better to keep the 40 C and sell the Cron.. There is any optical and quality difference between them? How accurate would be the 35 framelines or the 50 framelines with my 0.85x viewfinder? Thank You very much to all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted May 14, 2013 Posted May 14, 2013 Hi bruniroquai, Take a look here Doubt... 40 C or 35 Cron IV? Long trip, Leica M6 and.... I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
k_g_wolf ✝ Posted May 15, 2013 Share #2 Posted May 15, 2013 I would rule out the closest focal lenghts and get rid the 40 mm lens if it has to be. 35mm and 50mm are close enough, and each has it´s specific character which you can easily see in your photos. On the other hand, the 40mm is a splendid lens which would be an excellent backup in case you want a VERY small package and you are not in a position to decide between the other two ... Best GEORG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruniroquai Posted May 15, 2013 Author Share #3 Posted May 15, 2013 Thanks Georg, I've got jus concerning about the optical and build quality! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k_g_wolf ✝ Posted May 15, 2013 Share #4 Posted May 15, 2013 Well, I got the LEICA-SUMMICRON 50 and 35mm lenses, but quite often I grab the 40mm-lens (a MINOLTA-ROKKOR specimen I got together with a CLE in the 70ies) and I´am always surprised how good this tiny lens is. It´s not as sturdy as the other lenses, but I decided not to let it go and I´am glad I didn´t. Best GEORG Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruniroquai Posted May 15, 2013 Author Share #5 Posted May 15, 2013 Thanks Georg, I've decided to keep just the 35 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
k_g_wolf ✝ Posted May 15, 2013 Share #6 Posted May 15, 2013 A sensible decision. Here we have a 40mm-shot, taken at f2.0, when I was too lazy to carry the other two around. best GEORG Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/204685-doubt-40-c-or-35-cron-iv-long-trip-leica-m6-and/?do=findComment&comment=2322007'>More sharing options...
m.galimathias Posted May 15, 2013 Share #7 Posted May 15, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) Considering the overall package the 35mm IV Cron is a much better lens. I've posted a comparison between the two in the german forum. Regardless the higher price I'd definitely choose the "real" cron over the "c-cron" in terms of sharpness, micro contrast and handling (the angular sun-shade is beautiful!). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruniroquai Posted May 15, 2013 Author Share #8 Posted May 15, 2013 Considering the overall package the 35mm IV Cron is a much better lens.I've posted a comparison between the two in the german forum. Regardless the higher price I'd definitely choose the "real" cron over the "c-cron" in terms of sharpness, micro contrast and handling (the angular sun-shade is beautiful!). Thanks! I want it mostly for Neopan 400 and Ektar and Portra 160! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
algrove Posted May 16, 2013 Share #9 Posted May 16, 2013 A 35 or 28 will suit you better in Cuba. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted May 16, 2013 Share #10 Posted May 16, 2013 According to Erwin Puts the quality difference between the two is minimal if any. You must look for other considerations to decide. For instance the difference between a 50 mm lens and a 40 mm lens is so small that there is no rationale for carrying both on a long trip. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruniroquai Posted May 16, 2013 Author Share #11 Posted May 16, 2013 Yes but.. I much prefer a lens which fix with the framelines. I have this, the 35 IV, and a Summarit 50 1.5 which I Don't know if trade for the Sonnar 50.. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted May 16, 2013 Share #12 Posted May 16, 2013 ...I don't know if the 35 cron pre asph IV which I have is much better than the 40 C... I have both lenses that i find very close but your 35mm framelines will be more accurate with the 40/2 at medium to long distance if you don't mind to file the flange of the latter. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted May 17, 2013 Share #13 Posted May 17, 2013 Yes but.. I much prefer a lens which fix with the framelines. I have this, the 35 IV, and a Summarit 50 1.5 which I Don't know if trade for the Sonnar 50.. I don't know if that trade would gain you very much. The Sonnar is a bit like a Summarit with more focus shift. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bruniroquai Posted May 17, 2013 Author Share #14 Posted May 17, 2013 I will keep the Cron 35 and carry a rolleiflex 3.5E Planar for portraits Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.