IWC Doppel Posted March 24, 2013 Share #21 Â Posted March 24, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) I would go wider and the 24 is a great focal length IMO, I prefer to the 21, don't forget 28 either Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 Hi IWC Doppel, Take a look here Go wide or go long?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
michaelwj Posted March 25, 2013 Share #22 Â Posted March 25, 2013 Btw you can't crop, even a 24, to a reasonable well image that you would have shot with a 135. One of my passions is birds of prey, well I can forget that with cropping 24mm captures. Whereas in architecture I can use several captures with a 50 to attain the wide view of a 24 by using panorama software like PtGui. And the result is even better than one shot with a 24 Â Of course, but cropping a 90 to a 135 isn't such a big deal. Stitching is a good option for those who like to take the time - often the only way to get distortion free wide angles, especially good for architecture, but less useful for moving targets. I though this was more for the SLR crowd though? Its almost the antithesis of the leica no? Michael Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ananda Posted March 25, 2013 Share #23 Â Posted March 25, 2013 28 Summicron and 50 Lux ASPH is all I need with M9, but with M, I might add the 135. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
otto.f Posted March 25, 2013 Share #24  Posted March 25, 2013 Of course, but cropping a 90 to a 135 isn't such a big deal. Stitching is a good option for those who like to take the time - often the only way to get distortion free wide angles, especially good for architecture, but less useful for moving targets. I though this was more for the SLR crowd though? Its almost the antithesis of the leica no? Michael  Leica M lenses are still the best in the world, also for architecture. So there is no harm in using an M for architecture especially since the digital era started, where you formerly would use a large format camera for this, better than an SLR. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MarkP Posted March 25, 2013 Share #25 Â Posted March 25, 2013 28 Summicron and 50 Lux ASPH is all I need with M9... Â So true. But tht didn't stop me getting the other lenses that I want Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest tanks Posted March 26, 2013 Share #26  Posted March 26, 2013 When in doubt. Take both! The 135 Hektor or Elmar oldies can be picked up for a fraction of the price of a 24mm old or new.  So the question, after acquiring the 135 is really about spending the money for a 24mm. That question can only be answered by you.  Good point, I noticed that EX++ 135 Elmar E46s are going for a bit less than a third of the APO, and E39s going for a bit less than a quarter of the cost. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rramesh Posted March 27, 2013 Share #27 Â Posted March 27, 2013 Advertisement (gone after registration) It all depends on what you you are planning to do. For me a standard kit is a 50 lux and a 28 cron. It will work very well for me in 80% of the situation and reasonably well the other times. Â If I need to go wide I will add a 21 (the CV is what I have) and if I need to go long a 90 Elmarit M. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.