Jump to content

My pet peeve...


skinnfell

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Reviewers who make comments on image quality issues, and who do not provide downloadable Raw files.

 

Why are they so afraid that someone will steal their pictuers of fenceposts and walls? Is a 1000 pixel , photoshopped jpg supposed to prove anything at all other than the reviewers abilities as a photographer?

 

I understand that it is desirable to illustrate a review with good pictures, but how about making just ONE picture freely available?

It doesn't have to be the award winning shot.

 

I have my own workflow, and in order to use a review to base my decision whether to get this or that camera or lens or whatever, I have to have at least one image that i can put my own hands onto.

Particularly since we are talking about equipment that is extremely expensive and not freely available for a home trial.

 

So big thanks to: Jono Slack and Dr.Roehde!

(and slap on the hand of other reviewers who talk about, but do not show the goods)

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...