Jump to content

ImagePrint 9


vdb

Recommended Posts

Agreed. Very expensive and very nice.

 

I spent a month comparing results w.r.t. printing from Photoshop and my old standard Qimage. The color results were, in my opinion, always better, but in an incremental way. People might argue as to the improvement for the money, but I was very satisfied.

 

As you point out, B&W output really, really shines. I couldn't come close in Photoshop with the Epson driver on my 4900. And the profile valet is just icing on the cake.

 

Money well spent.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

I always hold off on updating an OS on my tower until IP support.

 

That would have been excellent advice for me to follow before updating my OS, only to learn that my NEC monitor built-in calibration software (SpectraView II) was not yet supported.:( (I fear Apple has diverted attention to mobile devices.)

 

Lesson learned.

 

Jeff

Link to post
Share on other sites

That would have been excellent advice for me to follow before updating my OS, only to learn that my NEC monitor built-in calibration software (SpectraView II) was not yet supported.:( (I fear Apple has diverted attention to mobile devices.)

 

Lesson learned.

 

Jeff

 

Yes that was good advice. Never update until you are sure.

 

I am in the same boat as you. Went ahead and updated to Mountain Lion and found my Spectraview II calibration HW inoperable. NEC says they will fix this in future OS updates, but I am not holding my breath.

 

But Imageprint does work, so all was not lost.

 

Mark

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...