Jump to content

21mm f1.4 or f3.4 for a Leica newbee/addict


Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Recommended Posts

Guest NEIL-D-WILLIAMS

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Having the SEM21, Voigtlaender 12, and Apo Telyt-R 180, I find the EVF very convenient.

Optical VF are so last millennium... :p

Ive tried both the Leica and Olimpus EVF and they are both crap..............I either use the OVF or LV
Link to post
Share on other sites

  • Replies 128
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Ive tried both the Leica and Olimpus EVF and they are both crap..............I either use the OVF or LV

 

Agreed, the EVF is crap.

 

But the OVF does not help framing at 21mm, and has no focus peaking when you adapt non-RF lenses.

 

About LV on the back screen, good luck using it outdoor in sunny places like everywhere in California. If your location is Malaysia, you should have troubles as well... at least with focus peaking and long lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

No need to use focus peaking with 21mm just use f5.6 and everything will be in focus

 

I'm concerned that the "just use f5.6" message is beginning to gain traction.

 

It may be true for images on the web but for large prints, e.g. A2, it is not true. The plane of sharp focus is often too apparent and the out of focus parts too obvious under such conditions. Correct focus is, it turns out, quite critical.

 

Surprised me at first but I have grown to realise that in the digital world and using Leica lenses the old assumptions about Depth of Field are no longer valid.

 

The problem is without doubt exacerbated by modern Leica lenses which are so sharp in the plane of focus that the eye immediately notices the parts that are not quite so sharp.

 

I do wonder some times if this is why some people prefer to use "older glass" - it's a lot more forgiving in this respect.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't support the "5,6 and everything will be in focus" either. Correct focus is critical if you print A2 using 21mm at 5,6. And correct focus for me is at the main subject, not using any theoretical zone focus.

 

It depends.

 

Not all photos need to be critically sharp and in focus, even when printed very large. The style and the subject matter do not always require it and as we know some great photos have been at least slightly out of focus.

 

But I agree that when they do, they do, and then there's no substitute for getting it right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...