Jump to content

Smoothing out clear blue skies


Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Sometimes when shooting I use a clear blue sky as the backdrop for a subject. Blue skies can be one of the things digital cameras seem to have have difficulty handling. Every so often after applying some post work I'll see those rough gradation bands as the sky goes from a deep blue to lighter blue or just rough pixelation (the non film grain-like kind) when looking at the picture in its native size. Any tips for smoothing that out that don't involve going in with photoshop brushes or bigger sensor?

 

Thanks for your input

Link to post
Share on other sites

Rough gradation is a result of using a low resolution file for working on in post processing and/or over working the area and adding too many adjustments too crudely. Start with a high res file, 16 bit as Andy says, and ideally use RAW saved as a TIFF for doing your post processing (keep your TIFF as the master file that you worked on and then convert any files to JPEG, reduce the size etc, from that for web use etc).

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes when shooting I use a clear blue sky as the backdrop for a subject. Blue skies can be one of the things digital cameras seem to have have difficulty handling. Every so often after applying some post work I'll see those rough gradation bands as the sky goes from a deep blue to lighter blue or just rough pixelation (the non film grain-like kind) when looking at the picture in its native size. Any tips for smoothing that out that don't involve going in with photoshop brushes or bigger sensor?

 

Thanks for your input

That has nothing to do with the camera or the files, " banding" is common in poor quality monitors and low end graphic cards.

If you want to get away from that you will need to invest in a Professional quality monitor..like an Eizo the Eizo has about 90% of the Adobe colour gamut and is capable of processing up to 10 or 12 bits per pixel

If not an Eizo, shop for a monitor that is true HD, true uniform colour and has absolutely no banding..... I can prove that if you print you blue sky you will see no banding at all, its the monitor.

 

Later you might want to consider getting a graphics card that uses display port etc like the AMD Radeon Fire GL 8800

 

Cheers, JRM

Link to post
Share on other sites

That has nothing to do with the camera or the files, " banding" is common in poor quality monitors and low end graphic cards.

 

I'm sorry but this is just not true. How else would you see rough gradation in other peoples photographs when they print them out, or post them on the internet, if it was just a phenomena of the monitor or graphic's card? And somewhat reckless in suggesting it can be fixed by buying a very expensive monitor. True you may be able to discern any faults better with an Eizo, but a cheap monitor doesn't cause banding, it can't have any influence on the image.

 

Steve

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I work with 16 bit files and exclusively with RAW/TIFF. I never make adjustments over 10%in LR and it's usually around 5% in hue and saturation of the blue channel. This happens to 1 out of 15 photos and I know the shooting conditions in which the sensor struggles (midday sun, 50-30 degrees above the horizon) . I work in a 2 year old IMac. I was hoping there was just a quick hitch to like corner fix for this kind of thing. I just got a Nex7 and I look at the untouched RAW files at 100iso and the sky looks pretty mediocre. The M8 has better RAW files OOC but less lattidude in post. I know it's the digital sensors inability to deal with such a huge swath of color at such a great distance. Medium format handles the tonal range much better then any small sensor could.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Best you process as a raw file at full color depth. Gradients on a JPEG will not work because you start getting discrete steps rather than a gradient.

 

Try a sky selection and opacity adjusted median filter

 

To see if your monitor is at fault, make the image large large and move it. Monitor banding will not move. File banding will move.

 

An Eizo monitor is the best way to go. The $100 monitor that came with the computer package or a lap top will not work.

Link to post
Share on other sites

To see if your monitor is at fault, make the image large large and move it. Monitor banding will not move. File banding will move.

Even monitor banding will appear to move if it’s caused by a display panel showing less than 16.7 million colours. This is a common issue with notebook displays.

 

Apart from that I would check the individual channels of the image. Blue skys have comparatively dark and thus often quite noisy red channels.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm sorry but this is just not true. How else would you see rough gradation in other peoples photographs when they print them out, or post them on the internet, if it was just a phenomena of the monitor or graphic's card? And somewhat reckless in suggesting it can be fixed by buying a very expensive monitor. True you may be able to discern any faults better with an Eizo, but a cheap monitor doesn't cause banding, it can't have any influence on the image.

 

Steve

Nonsense..you didn't think through what I said..sorry banding does occur with video and image files

You coming from the assumption that all monitors are in fact ..flawless, nonsense.

 

IF there is banding on my Eizo, then there is something seriously wrong with the camera file,personally I have never seen it except from very low res files.

 

When purchasing a monitor the issue of banding including a whole host of other issues needs to be taken into consideration, monitors and not made by God , but human beings.

 

Cheers, JRM

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...