Jump to content

Advice please !


Addy444

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Big choice ahead -- :confused:--- I have the offer of a Lumix L1 ( with that superb Leica lens) or a Panasonic LC1 ( with that superb Leica lens )

 

Both the same price to me--any thoughts?

 

The only thing that might sway me towards the L1 is the fact the lens is stabilised --and as I'm getting shaky -it might help?

 

Thanks :)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Depending on price I would personally look at other alternatives.

 

Both are old cameras. The L1 is a 4/3rds sensor camera yet manages to be as bulky as a FF DSLR, quite remarkable!

 

The Digilux 2 / LC1 is a cult camera and would be my choice of the two, but I'd probably choose a Nikon or Canon DSLR instead of either. It really depends what you want to do with the camera.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks -the LC1 has had a new sensor --I'm not worried about size just after that "Leica" look and the best quality from one of the two cameras -don't want a DSLR ( been there ) -now looking for a nice old fashioned Leica Lens camera -can't afford the Leica Digilux 2 or 3 so thought one of these 2 equivalent Lumix/Panasonic cameras might do the job. I appreciate they are not the same as the real Leicas but I'm sure I will more than happy with the photos these 2 cameras can produce with the right settings --finding it hard to decide which one ! -- :rolleyes: --so don't say buy both !!!!

 

I have a couple of days to decide before the seller gets rid of them on the bay. :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Big choice ahead -- :confused:--- I have the offer of a Lumix L1 ( with that superb Leica lens) or a Panasonic LC1 ( with that superb Leica lens )

 

Both the same price to me--any thoughts?

 

The only thing that might sway me towards the L1 is the fact the lens is stabilised --and as I'm getting shaky -it might help?

 

Thanks :)

 

For the same amount of money I'd rather buy one oft the 2011 and meanwhile inexpensive mft bodies with the new Panasonic-Leica (Summilux) 25mm f1.4. A much better package with a stellar lens and at least as much Leica in it as compared to a L1 or LC1 or their Leica siblings. The mft body you will be able to upgrade in a few years, and the lens will continue to deliver.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I appreciate they are not the same as the real Leicas but I'm sure I will more than happy with the photos these 2 cameras can produce

 

The Panasonic cameras are identical to the Leica versions apart from minor design tweaks. The extra cost new for the Leica is due to software/warranty (usually better software/longer warranty) and their cost base/overheads.

 

They are all made on the same Panasonic production line.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Panasonic cameras are identical to the Leica versions apart from minor design tweaks. The extra cost new for the Leica is due to software/warranty (usually better software/longer warranty) and their cost base/overheads.

 

They are all made on the same Panasonic production line.

 

the jpg rendering engine is different between the Panasonic/Leica versions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

:) Thank you all for your helpful replies --I have bought the LC1 -amazing Lens and very quiet.--- :D I guessed the old "chestnut" would come out when people start comparing the Leica vers the Panasonic !

 

For the record -I have had a Digilux 2 and now have the Pany version -and I can see no difference between the jpegs -admittedly I am getting old now and my eyesight is not as good as it was.

 

At the end of the day -as most, if not all of us would agree with -its the person behind the camera that matters.

 

Thanks for all the valuable help -much appreciated

 

I'vve attached a picy of the cat taken with the LC1

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

I cannot post comparison pictures taken with the digilux 2 and the Panasonic LC1 as I sold the Digilux (foolishly) about a year ago --but looking at the photos I have taken on both cameras I can see no discernable difference between them -I rarely take raw files but tend to use the jpeg photos straight out of the cameras without any manipulating at all in computer software -so I am comparing like for like. Agreed I am getting older and my eyesight is not as good as it used to be but the LC1 to me appears to have that same magical film like quality that Leica owners rave about -and that same handling and quality build. I've attached 2 pictures from the LC1 taken a couple of days ago. :)

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

... I rarely take raw files but tend to use the jpeg photos straight out of the cameras without any manipulating at all in computer software -so I am comparing like for like....

Well, only if the cameras' jpeg settings for saturation, contrast, sharpness, and white balance were the same.:o

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's probably been covered before but what is collective recommendation for the image settings (contrast, sharpness and saturation). Got them all on standard at the moment.

It's a matter of personal taste of course but mine are all set to standard.

 

Pete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wow -what a super photo from Blindjock :) --check out the tulips in the photo attached -straight from the jpeg in the LC1 camera -seems to have that film-like quality.

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...