Jump to content

B&W sensor only?-- Merged--


sblitz

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

On the past leica take the risk of moire pattern but unexpectedly faced with the infrared contamination because of thin cover glass of the sensor(M8).What we see today,other major companies realized that it was right to do so and follow the same way(Nikon D800E).On the past again, sensors have RGB BAYERN pattern and do need alot of computer calcutions that I call it personally as "hokus pokus" do not represant the real life,foveon attemp to solve problem on the tree layer bases of RGB.Today what we need is more natural sensor on the bases of lights on and off but no color pattern and computer lies.That what I wish to see like on DCRAW with D or d command on the out of camera files with sounds of Santana "turn the lights off".

Link to post
Share on other sites

Now I know that Leica is already catering to a niche market but this would be a niche of the niche. I personally would not have an interest as I do shoot color and convert to BW when it is appropriate. I would not want to lose that choice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Perhaps because someone would like an expensive camera that takes even better B/W photographs than the one at hand?

 

But would it? If the tonal characteristics were those of a desaturated colour image it wouldn't look good at all - regardless of increased resolution.

Link to post
Share on other sites

...If the tonal characteristics were those of a desaturated colour image it wouldn't look good at all - regardless of increased resolution.

 

B/W films are carefully designed to yield a pleasing or convincing mapping from hue to brightness. Simply dropping the chroma and saturation channels is not designed towards that end and will produce disappointing results for that reason.

 

I think we can safely assume if a high quality camera maker sells a B/W camera that the mapping from colored light to B/W brightness will be as carefully crafted as for film.

 

If...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Instead of introducing a "new" camera for b/w-only they should improve the incamera b/w-abilities

of their overpriced existing flagship, the M9. A b/w-special edition does only secure their production

- hopefully - until Sept. before the ultimate M10 appears.

 

 

 

 

best

GEORG

Edited by k_g_wolf
Link to post
Share on other sites

I think we can safely assume if a high quality camera maker sells a B/W camera that the mapping from colored light to B/W brightness will be as carefully crafted as for film

 

But how would they do that without using a colour sensor? I thought a b&w pixel can only measure overal intensity, not the intensity at different frequencies of light. Can a pixel be sensitive at some frequencies in the visible spectrum?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Me, I'm a color guy. Especially with digital. I do some B&W conversion, but I'm not about to work with a B&W-only camera.

 

But a monochrome sensor does offer the advantage of no color filters (which do reduce the available light, as dave_d mentions, by close to two stops). And for Leica, it does away with the headache of "red edge" and "cyan drift" and such. Uncoded or especially troublesome wide-angles like the 21mm Super-Angulons or some of the C/V wides would gain a new lease on life, for those who do only do B&W. It would indeed also require less IR filtering (but not zero - see LL review below), but would still need some kind of protective glass cover over the silicon.

 

Kodak made monochrome versions of a couple of their SLRs over the past two decades, including their very first DCS-100.

 

Kodak DCS 100

Kodak 760m Review

 

They were niche products and still didn't sell very well.

 

But Leica's "niche" is niches. A "special edition" by which they can suck an extra $5000 out of buyers is right up their alley.

 

Somebody (Fuji?) made a forensic digital camera. They required buyers to sign a statement that they will use it only for genuine forensic/scientific purposes (eg: not photographing through peoples clothes.)

 

About the fringing - while there is no color to see, the dominance of such frequencies should produce slight focus issues. No?

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

Better change your user name to "Luminance project" ;)

 

Tobey, yeah, you'd have to dig out the 25A and other filters for tone control based on subject colors - just like Delta 100.

 

Pico, no, the broad area "red-edge" type stuff isn't the same as chromatic aberrations. Red-edge may even be caused in part by the Bayer pattern (per Stefan Daniel).

 

However - yes, lens chromatic aberrations will present as blur or double-images, without the possibility of corrections, since there will not be 3 color channels that can be scaled for alignment in .dng processing as there are in full-color images.

 

I wonder, in fact, how raw processors would handle a single-channel image with no Bayer pattern to "de-bayerize." I guess something could be written into the .dng metadata that says "don't try to combine data from neighboring pixels with this image."

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Don't know how successful it's been from a sales point but PhaseOne has a black and white

only digital back in their lineup

 

Pure black and white medium format digital back

 

Achromatic+

 

 

And that's got a Kodak sensor in too. Images look good from it, see here

 

There just might be something in this....;)

 

Jim

Link to post
Share on other sites

In past threads many of us have said we would buy an M9 with a B&W sensor and no LCD, as long as it was as thin as a film M, and I was one of them - I still would. This was wishful thinking, as I can't see any camera manufacturer thinking a camera with no LCD would sell in significant numbers. Since I only put B&W films in my analog Ms (all five of them:eek:) it makes perfect sense to me. But it would not to most, who need flexibility. But I know I have an OM-D arriving next month (I loved the original OM series and will be happy to use the OM-D for general photography requiring colour). But if the May 10 date has any significance, this is the M10, and Leica must know there is little profit in my strange and narrow preferences.

 

Chris

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Unless I'm seriously mistaken, all digital sensors are fundamentally black and white with a pattern of red, blue and green filters laid over the sensor. Remove the filters and the resulting image will have both a higher resolution and greater dynamic range.

 

Sure, you will lose some of the control software gives in changing the capture's tonality but the trade-off would be a 36-54 MB capture with excellent range and crisp tonal transitions. It would result in a unique look that could be very appealing.

 

From a printer's perspective, I don't like to print B&W digital conversions too large because they do not look natural. Where a color capture from the M9 can make a spectacular 24x36, a B&W conversion looks better at 16x24. If this new camera can produce a full tonal range at somewhere around the 36 + MB range, then 40x60 inch B&W prints will be stunning.

 

So yes, if this is the case - and the camera is not a $8,000 to $10,000 special edition but rather one south of the $5,000 mark - then count me in. Chrome MP style please.

 

Tom

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...