hiphop Posted February 15, 2007 Share #1  Posted February 15, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Need advice on white balance :  1 - can we use a gray card (in the hand) knowing that the focus with a 28mm at such a short distance is impossible (I believe a correct focus is needed when using the grey card - min 0.75 m) we can drop it on the ground but in some cases it is better to keep it in the hand.  2 - do you recommand a grey card for the M8 or the options like Kelvin and DNG processing are fair enough  3 - any experience with the "WhitBal" gray card and if known would you recommand the small one or medium one for outdoors shooting ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 15, 2007 Posted February 15, 2007 Hi hiphop, Take a look here M8 - White Balance and gray card. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
Shootist Posted February 15, 2007 Share #2 Â Posted February 15, 2007 One word, Expodisc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bill Sievers Posted February 15, 2007 Share #3 Â Posted February 15, 2007 Two words EXPO Disc! ;-) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nitnaros Posted February 15, 2007 Share #4 Â Posted February 15, 2007 Hiphop, Couple of comments: Â a) A whitecard does not have to be in focusyou can hold it close with your left arm for example. What is important is the light falling on the card and that you have the card filling your field of view. Imagine a mixed light situation with bluish daylight and a tungsten light bulb. If you hold your whitecard close to the lamp, but you shoot your subect next to the window, you will be off. Â In my opinion the best approach is to set an approximate whitebalance via the Kelvin option and for more critical shots use a whitecard or expodisc. You learn quite quickly how certain light conditions translate to Kelvin settings (say sunny daylight ~ 5600K; bluish shadows ~ 6000+ etc.). In addition you see the approx. result on your LCD. Â I set most of the time an approx. Kelvin value, shoot, and look for something that should be neutral grey or white in the image via LCD; then adjust the Kelvin value up or down. And yes, for more critical cases, use one of the mentioned reference tools. Â That way I have not had any significant problem with auto-whitebalance or the available presets - I don't use them at all. I always set my own Kelvin value. Â Peter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiphop Posted February 15, 2007 Author Share #5 Â Posted February 15, 2007 Thank you, your advices are gold for me... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dfdann Posted February 15, 2007 Share #6 Â Posted February 15, 2007 Small WhitBal works great for me. Cheers, Dan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jamie Roberts Posted February 15, 2007 Share #7 Â Posted February 15, 2007 Advertisement (gone after registration) Do a search on "White Balance" in the forum, there's a lot of information here, and your workflow will depend on whether you need to set WB beforehand (JPEG) or in post (RAW). Â Having said that, a grey reference is probably more effective than a white reference (the experts are split on this, but light grey seems to be the consensus). Â But if you're doing a custom WB, then of course you want something light enough to give the camera a chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bap Posted February 15, 2007 Share #8 Â Posted February 15, 2007 expodisc works great:) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemeng Posted February 15, 2007 Share #9 Â Posted February 15, 2007 I know a lot of people swear by Expodisc, but be careful, it isn't 100% foolproof. Â If you point your expodisc covered lens at a bright red wall, then your colour readings are going to be out-of-whack. This should be obvious, but it can bite you. Expodisc works best if you point it at average coloured scenes which contain a general mix of colours. Â Pretty much like reflected light-meters & light intensity readings really. Â Speaking as someone who has struggled with colour balance for @ 10 years (having to shoot interior 360 x 180 degree panoramas), your best bet is to use colour reference cards. Either a white-card designed for WB (at a pinch a sheet of white paper will do), or else photograph a grey step-wedge colour calibration target. Ideally you'll do both :?) Â This is for critical work and what I do. The WB card gets the colour balance mostly right. The multi-grey card contains a number of grey panels of differing intensity. You use a photo of the card as an eye-dropper target in your RAW converter or Photoshop to fine-adjust the RGB values at each different grey-intensity level. Â And - oh yes - for really critical work you also have to use CC filters, for if there isn't enough blue light falling onto your sensor or film, then you've got to boost it via a filter (most of the time an 80B will do). Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
danielt Posted February 15, 2007 Share #10 Â Posted February 15, 2007 Pocket WhitBal card, works very well IMHO Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wstotler Posted February 15, 2007 Share #11 Â Posted February 15, 2007 Concur with the others claiming the pocket WhiBal card works great for most situations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
carstenw Posted February 15, 2007 Share #12 Â Posted February 15, 2007 Old Pringles lid I use a WhiBal card myself, since I can't find an old Pringles lid, but a three-word Exp O Disc is probably as good Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest V64 Posted February 15, 2007 Share #13 Â Posted February 15, 2007 I carry a (clean) handkerchief in my (left) jeans or shirt pocket pocket, and simply drape it over the camera (and lens!) - click and its done. Works fine - costs nothing. Yes you do have be a little careful where you point the camera. Costs nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wparsonsgisnet Posted February 15, 2007 Share #14 Â Posted February 15, 2007 A linen handkerchief, right? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
russell Posted February 16, 2007 Share #15 Â Posted February 16, 2007 My ten year old Pentax micro-fiber lens cleaning cloth is also a grey "card". I'll have to try it out for white balance now... How's that for multi-purpose? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiphop Posted February 16, 2007 Author Share #16 Â Posted February 16, 2007 Quite interesting... Â Then it seems that people prefer : Â 1 Expodisc - the star 2 WhitBal (pocket) comes 2nd but very easy to use (or grey card) 3 Kelvin setting 4 handkerchief is my favorite but needs to be tested (too good to be true) Â I have now all the most usual options and exciting time testing them... Â Many thanks ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest V64 Posted February 16, 2007 Share #17 Â Posted February 16, 2007 Bill, Â Yes indeed, a White (!) linen one - maybe need to take care that there are no excessive 'whiteners' in the washing powder - these might cause a 'blue tinge' rather than a neutral white - but it is all an approximation. Â David Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
hiphop Posted February 16, 2007 Author Share #18 Â Posted February 16, 2007 I carry a (clean) handkerchief in my (left) jeans or shirt pocket pocket, and simply drape it over the camera (and lens!) - click and its done. Works fine - costs nothing. Yes you do have be a little careful where you point the camera. Costs nothing. Works indeed. I just tried with a nice handkerchief (with tungstene light) Perfect ! I did it as well with a Leica lens cleaner (if you want to use professional tools... :-) works as well. Tomorrow I shall try with daylight. If it works in other situation the same way I can start saving the money I would have spent with various other expensive options and soon buy an extra lense... Great ! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_reid Posted February 16, 2007 Share #19 Â Posted February 16, 2007 Here's another vote for WhiBal Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scott kirkpatrick Posted February 16, 2007 Share #20 Â Posted February 16, 2007 I use the WhiBal and occasionally check things with a Gretag-McB color checker, an IT8 photoprinted target and Imatest. But since I am not making a living having skin tones come out where the owner of the skin thinks they should be, I tend to take color balance as an artistic tool, not a scientific question, and set it by hand sometimes. Â scott Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.