Jump to content

In praise of point and shoot


NZDavid

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Almost invariably the term "point and shoot" is derided. For example, "I wanted to get an X1, a real Leica, not another P/S..." But why? Surely some of the best photographs have been point and shoot moments? Or snapshots. Another derisive term. Street photography is largely point and shoot. HCB was a P/S snapper. And Leica has always been the ultimate point and shoot camera, from the Leica I to the M9. Set shutter speed and aperture, prefocus, point and shoot. What could be simpler? By contrast, many of today's digicams scarcely qualify for the term. There are so many modes, menus, and multi-functions buttons, it's easy to nudge them by mistake.

 

For me, the simpler the better. Isn't it about time "point and shoot" lost its negative image and true minimalist P/S cameras were looked up to?

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's just words, it doesn't matter what label you use.

 

Point and shoot to me, means just that. A camera you can pick up, point and shoot i.e. it's auto everything. Using a Leica, setting exposure so you can shoot at 5.6/8 and use zone focus isn't point and shoot in that sense.

 

At the end of the day either type of camera can produce the results, and it's results what matter!

Link to post
Share on other sites

D-Lux 5. Just got it. Perfect point and shoot..I'm still confused about how the myriad other modes work on this particular camera, but the Snapshot Mode will work fine for the moment.The camera is beautifully finished (I know it is a Panasonic in disguise, but so what.).

Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Well, I'd never have thought of a Linhof Technika as a point and shoot, but why not! Leica M, can be. D-Lux 5, yes, so long as you don't nudge settings by mistake. Actually an excellent camera. Just words? Yes, James, but I'd like to see better definitions. What exactly is a point and shoot camera? A fully automatic one? A semi automatic? Merely a compact one? My definition would be on that is as fast and simple to use as possible. And that's not a bad thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've been looking up to the M9 with 35 cron at f8 + hyperfocal + auto ISO / A mode for over a year. IMHO you can't finde a better point and shoot... :)

 

I agree: of course no better, but many cheaper :D and when you look at the photos taken in the snap situations and their quality, the cheaper solutions do their job really good (maybe same, some better).

 

So finally the Leica M is IMHO no P&S camera, if one uses it only for that situation, it is a waste of money, because the potential of that camera is on another side.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...