Erik Gunst Lund Posted February 19, 2011 Share #61 Posted February 19, 2011 (edited) Advertisement (gone after registration) These are shot with APS-C sized sensor that means that the corners I'm talking about on a Leica M8 are cropped off, there is a rather large difference between a 1.5 and 1,3 crop. BTW I asked for upper left corner, but I would guess it's OK on the R1ds,,,, The picture is rather difficult to judge at 50% Edited February 19, 2011 by Erik Gunst Lund Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 19, 2011 Posted February 19, 2011 Hi Erik Gunst Lund, Take a look here To modify a 40 summicron. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
lct Posted February 19, 2011 Share #62 Posted February 19, 2011 Never noticed any problem in 20+ years with my film Ms or when i tested the M8 a couple of years ago but i'm no pixel peeper so i may have missed something i don't know. What you say surprises me though given that R-D1s microlenses are not as good as M8's. This is obvious with lenses like CV 15 or 21 for instance. I would have thought that the 40/2 is problem free from this standpoint. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Gunst Lund Posted February 19, 2011 Share #63 Posted February 19, 2011 I'm a pixel peeper, I need to know what the client get's, and sometimes they need corner to corner sharpness You will also see this issue when stitching images together. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted February 19, 2011 Share #64 Posted February 19, 2011 As you like Erik but a good CLA could be usefull don't you think so? I have 3 copies of the 40/2 the more beatens are the best but the mint one would need some CLA as well. FWIW. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Gunst Lund Posted February 19, 2011 Share #65 Posted February 19, 2011 Any haze or separation re the glass definitely needs a CLA not the case here though Your captures are very sharp, clean and contrasty so you sample(s) must be fine! I do a lot of tinkering with lenses, my good friend Bjørn Rørslett has supplied me with CPU's for MF Nikkors, I have also helped him and many others on NikonGear CPU chipping their lenses. I CPU chipped ny Noct Nikkor and during the process it got rater hazy inside, so a complete rebuild of the glass was needed, even the apperture blades and the ball bearing for the aperture ring Another project was the legendary Voigtlander APO Lanthar 125/2.5 The best SLR macro lens. I got a Canon FD mount version of the lens rather cheap and converted it to Nikon F-mount, ie reversing the aperture lever action and adjusting the movement to worg as a G-Type Nikkor lens. Sorry for the rambling:rolleyes: Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted February 19, 2011 Share #66 Posted February 19, 2011 Only you can decide if you're happy with your lens or not. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 19, 2011 Share #67 Posted February 19, 2011 Advertisement (gone after registration) Any (wideangle) (older) lens has quality falloff towards the corners. So has the Summicron 40. Actually it is exceedingly good given that it was built as an el-cheapo lens (relatively) sold as a kit with an entry-level camera. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted February 19, 2011 Share #68 Posted February 19, 2011 Did you use one on your M9? Any pic with it? I would like to see how it renders re: vignetting compared to 35mm lenses. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Gunst Lund Posted February 19, 2011 Share #69 Posted February 19, 2011 Would be interesting with a M9 comment re corner IQ Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
photoshutter Posted February 19, 2011 Share #70 Posted February 19, 2011 M8 and 40mm at 2.0: http://masters.galleries.dpreview.com.s3.amazonaws.com/238749.jpg?AWSAccessKeyId=14Y3MT0G2J4Y72K3ZXR2&Expires=1298159862&Signature=oWscyDI7g6zqNtJH3Kz0yIHrceA%3d Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Gunst Lund Posted February 20, 2011 Share #71 Posted February 20, 2011 AccessDeniedRequest has expiredB20C568AE75CBE072011-02-19T23:57:42ZuvmNsg5DI41i0uHPWdFZK8YzCaIdlWFVHHLjEtLH7jBREftngDJV1ljmIpyzUv/S2011-02-20T09:35:52Z Seems to be down? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 20, 2011 Share #72 Posted February 20, 2011 Did you use one on your M9? Any pic with it? I would like to see how it renders re: vignetting compared to 35mm lenses.I'll upload some. For carrying around it is my standard lens, except when the summilux 50 asph is called for. I'm going to sell a couple of 35 mm lenses. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 20, 2011 Share #73 Posted February 20, 2011 (edited) I think this is a nice one to judge vignetting from No corrections, a straight conversion. This is at 2.0 Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited February 20, 2011 by jaapv Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140974-to-modify-a-40-summicron/?do=findComment&comment=1594459'>More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 20, 2011 Share #74 Posted February 20, 2011 (edited) Nothing wrong with the resolution either: Btw these are M9 shots. Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Edited February 20, 2011 by jaapv Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140974-to-modify-a-40-summicron/?do=findComment&comment=1594474'>More sharing options...
lct Posted February 20, 2011 Share #75 Posted February 20, 2011 Good ones. I see no problems in the corners. How did you code the lens? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
lct Posted February 20, 2011 Share #76 Posted February 20, 2011 Your first pic makes me think of this one as well. 40/2, f/2.8. No sharp corners though. Sorry Erik. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 20, 2011 Share #77 Posted February 20, 2011 The best coding would be the Summilux 35 pre-sph, but there is no coding for that one, just a menu selection. I coded it as a Summicron 35 (old) which comes very close to the optimum. The vignetting is considerably better than on film that way. No problems in the corners at all on the M9 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Erik Gunst Lund Posted February 21, 2011 Share #78 Posted February 21, 2011 Some 100% crops of the corners, mountain shot, please Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 21, 2011 Share #79 Posted February 21, 2011 Sure Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here… Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! Quote Link to post Share on other sites Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members! ' data-webShareUrl='https://www.l-camera-forum.com/topic/140974-to-modify-a-40-summicron/?do=findComment&comment=1595657'>More sharing options...
Erik Gunst Lund Posted February 22, 2011 Share #80 Posted February 22, 2011 Thanks, looks like the corners are a little soft,,, Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.