svenning Posted December 26, 2010 Share #1 Posted December 26, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) I'm going to Rome for a week - and would like to seek the Leica Forum members advise about which two lenses I should bring along for the photography? I have the following Leica lenses to choose from: 19mm, 24mm, 35mm, 50mm, 60mm macro, 90mm, 135mm,180mm & 400mm. I only want to bring two lenses inorder to bring the weight down to carry. All the best - Svenning, Denmark Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 26, 2010 Posted December 26, 2010 Hi svenning, Take a look here Visit to Rome - what two lenses to carry?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
stunsworth Posted December 26, 2010 Share #2 Posted December 26, 2010 Impossible to say. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted December 26, 2010 Share #3 Posted December 26, 2010 24mm 50mm Do you REALLY want to lug around a 400mm? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scsambrook Posted December 26, 2010 Share #4 Posted December 26, 2010 Which camera do you intend to take ? The choice for M8 would perhaps be different to that for M9 or film Leica . . . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
andybarton Posted December 26, 2010 Share #5 Posted December 26, 2010 It must be an R camera. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bocaburger Posted December 26, 2010 Share #6 Posted December 26, 2010 From the lenses listed I suspect these are R-series. To me the only question is: what kind of shots do you want to do? I could tell you what lenses I would bring, but it may or may not be of any use to you at all. With a heavy system like the R, I would probably have to limit myself to just one lens, and that would have to be the 35. Not as wide as I would like, but wide enough to get me most of what I would want. When I had an R system I used it only once for traveling, 2 bodies with a 21 S/A, 35-70 and 70-210. It was so horrendously heavy for me that after the first day I left one body and the 21 and 70-210 in the hotel safe. With my 5D, on the rare occasions I travel with it, I use a 28-135. I mostly travel with the M, and for me, in Rome, I would want (M9) at minimum 15, 21, 35 and 90. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
scsambrook Posted December 26, 2010 Share #7 Posted December 26, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) It must be an R camera. Now, now . . . it doesn't have to be an R . . . he might just have one of those old Visoflex thingummies Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
doubice Posted December 26, 2010 Share #8 Posted December 26, 2010 I am certain that Svenning is referring to an R outfit. There was no 60 macro available for "one of those old Visoflex thingummies"... Nigh impossible to make a suggestion, without knowing what type of photography you do. With your lens roster, I would prefer to take three lenses - 24, 60 Macro and 135. Travel is where zoom lenses come in handy..... Best, Jan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sfage Posted December 26, 2010 Share #9 Posted December 26, 2010 If you're interested in getting images of the city and the surroundings, then a 400 would be a complete waste of time... unless you're expecting a heard of wildabeast to come running through the Serengeti... next to the coffee shop. In fact, zooms (in my opinion) are useless for actually trying to capture the greater beauty of a city. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pop Posted December 26, 2010 Share #10 Posted December 26, 2010 If you're interested in getting images of the city and the surroundings, then a 400 would be a complete waste of time... unless you're expecting a heard of wildabeast to come running through the Serengeti... next to the coffee shop. In fact, zooms (in my opinion) are useless for actually trying to capture the greater beauty of a city. On the other hand, taking shots of all the gargoyles on the spires might require long focal lengths. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted December 26, 2010 Share #11 Posted December 26, 2010 28-90 zoom or 19 & 35 or just the 400, to be different Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
zoomstop Posted December 26, 2010 Share #12 Posted December 26, 2010 24mm and a 50mm. 24mm = Architecture 50mm = Closest thing to a human Eye - Great perspective. I personally have the 24,35,50 lux, 35 and 70 sumi and the 50 nocti. For travel I take the 24 lux, 35 sumi and the 50 nocti Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
svenning Posted December 26, 2010 Author Share #13 Posted December 26, 2010 Thank you Gentlemen for your suggestions. I have decided to go for the 24mm Elmarit-R and the 135mm Elmarit-R. An old fashioned combination maybe - but I am also old fashioned by nature...so..... All the best - Svenning, Denmark. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted December 26, 2010 Share #14 Posted December 26, 2010 What do you imagine using the 135 for? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WeiterWinkel Posted December 26, 2010 Share #15 Posted December 26, 2010 Hi, I visited Rome just a few weeks ago with a Leica M9, an Elmarit 21/2.8, a Summicron 35/2 Asph. and a Zeiss Planar 50/1.5. I didn't miss a tele lens. Here are some of the results: Rom - a set on Flickr Cheers and have a good time Thomas Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
farnz Posted December 26, 2010 Share #16 Posted December 26, 2010 Svenning, You've told us what focal length lenses you have but you haven't mentioned how fast any of them are. You might like to consider including your fastest lens for the fantastic Roman building interiors to avoid potential noise at high ISO values. Pete. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ndjambrose Posted December 26, 2010 Share #17 Posted December 26, 2010 I can't answer your question because I don't know how you see. The style of your photos, the focal lengths you work at, your preferences for subject matter, and even the time of day you prefer to experience a city are all important factors that govern which lenses you might choose to work with. Maybe share some representative photos and give people an idea. Otherwise the only thing anyone can do is make suggestions based on their own preferences.... which isn't going to help you at all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted December 26, 2010 Share #18 Posted December 26, 2010 These threads are usually pointless, everyone offers a different suggestion and the OP usually decides upon something different yet again! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
daveleo Posted December 26, 2010 Share #19 Posted December 26, 2010 i have to say the 24 + the fastest lens that you own (but nothing beyond 90mm, and even that is questionable in a city) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NZDavid Posted December 26, 2010 Share #20 Posted December 26, 2010 When in Rome, what lenses do the Romans use? Up to the individual of course but when I was there a few years ago I took the 24, 35, 50, and 90. To restrict yourself to two, I'd agree 24 and 50 are a good combination -- but the 35 is also very useful. 90 for details. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.