Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
DavidStone

Scan + HDR

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Now that I have the HDR software form Nik, I'm thinking of re-scanning some of my long-scale "difficult" BW negatives to discover if HDR can produce a better result (i.e. print) than a single scan. I have the Epson V700 scanner, and I'm using Vuescan. I also have Epson Scan that came with the scanner, although I've not used it much.

 

But - I can't discover a way of producing two or more scans of different exposures from one neg. I feel that it must be possible, and that I'm missing somethng obvious.

 

Has anyone tried this? Can anyone offer any advice from their own experience?

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Without knowing your actual hardware or software I can offer the hint that you have to disable automatic exposure correction when scanning for HDR. You then can set the contrast setting to low and the brightness setting to dark, medium and bright, respective, for three consecutive scans.

 

On the other hand, you might want to set the resulting file format to something like TIFF with a bit depth of more than 8. Bit depths of 12 and 16 are common values. In that case, you need but one scan which you then can process with the tone mapping part of the HDR procedure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Without knowing your actual hardware or software I can offer the hint that you have to disable automatic exposure correction when scanning for HDR. You then can set the contrast setting to low and the brightness setting to dark, medium and bright, respective, for three consecutive scans.

 

On the other hand, you might want to set the resulting file format to something like TIFF with a bit depth of more than 8. Bit depths of 12 and 16 are common values. In that case, you need but one scan which you then can process with the tone mapping part of the HDR procedure.

 

Thanks for those hints, Philipp. I had a look at Epson Scan, which does indeed offer degrees of brightness and contrast. I normally use tiff@16bit for BW negs, with Vuescan. I'll experiment with the Epson software and see how it works out.

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
You then can set the contrast setting to low ...

 

Change that to "high", obviously.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I have done multiple scans of the same image (a slide in my case) using Vuescan before. IIRC, you don't need to rescan every time, but once it has been scanned in at full res, you can save several different versions of the file in memory, with the levels and exposure sliders adjusted as you wish.

 

There's no reason why you shouldn't be able to do this with a negative too, of course.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Advertisement (gone after registration)

Vuescan allows you to override the exposure - either up or down.

 

Right - but where do I find this option?

(I have the current version of Vuescan and I'm using the "Advanced" and not the "Basic" setup.)

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
I have done multiple scans of the same image (a slide in my case) using Vuescan before. IIRC, you don't need to rescan every time, but once it has been scanned in at full res, you can save several different versions of the file in memory, with the levels and exposure sliders adjusted as you wish.

 

There's no reason why you shouldn't be able to do this with a negative too, of course.

 

I'm obviously missing something here (I knew that already) but I can't locate these sliders.

 

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

OK. Here's my screen with the straight scan from a b&w negative.

 

[ATTACH]228475[/ATTACH]

 

And here's the adjustment to the brightness slider at 0.5

 

[ATTACH]228477[/ATTACH]

 

And here at 2

 

[ATTACH]228476[/ATTACH]

 

The straight scan, with no further PS work (apart from a very small level adjustment at the bottom end) is here

 

[ATTACH]228478[/ATTACH]

 

And after running the three scans as shown above through PS's HDR mode, this is the result. Again, the same minor levels tweak was done. Nothing else.

 

[ATTACH]228479[/ATTACH]

 

I'm not convinced that a better job couldn't be done using normal PS techniques.

 

Obviously, this isn't a particularly challenging negative, but it was on the top of my pile this evening.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thanks Andy. I'm now getting the message.

 

My switch from film to digital, with all its possibilities and complexities, is taking much longer than I'd anticipated, and I'm finding that "keep it simple" is not always a possibility. I don't have Photoshop. I'm increasingly standardising on Lightroom 3, and I've now got all the Nik stuff, including their HDR module. That's a lot to digest.

 

And I have a LOT of negs. - hence my original question. I'll now go off into a quiet corner and see if HDR can squeeze more out of some of my negs than I could in the darkroom.

 

Thanks again

Au revoir

David

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
Sign in to follow this  

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Stealth3kpl
      If you have one, why not try this?
      I'm slowly making my way through this YouTube page and it's very enjoyable.
      Pete
       
    • By gwpics
      I am just working through some transparency work and scanning it on to the computer. I was particularly pleased with this one which was taken in 1999 on Kodachrome 64 using a Leica M6. Scanning was with a Plustek 8200i, and post was with LT Classic.
      I think it is amazing how the work we have just put away into a filing cabinet etc. has stood the test of time, and before there is "ah, well it is Kodachrome" some Fuji Provia RDP is just as good.
      Gerry
       
       

      Hello guest! Please register or sign in to view the hidden content. Hallo Gast! Du willst die Bilder sehen? Einfach registrieren oder anmelden!
    • By IkarusJohn
      Please excuse me if this has already been covered.  I did a search and couldn't find anything on topic.
       
      I have about 30 years of slides and negatives, 135mm and 6x6 formats.  The results I'm getting from my Epson flatbed scanner and the 135mm scanner (I forget its name) are okay, but I'm wondering if I might get better results if I use my SL(601).  Is this correct?
       
      Can anyone advise if this is worth doing, what I need equipment wise (presumably some sort of holder and a uniform whit background) and if it is feasible to photograph negatives as well as slides?
       
      Or am I wasting my time?
       
      Cheers
      John
    • By Martin B
      Want to share my experience here to install two scanner related Silverfast 8 software packages on the same PC which allows to work with two scanners. I am currently using the Plustek 8200i scanner with Silverfast 8 Ai Suite and the Epson V850 with Silverfast 8 SE Suite. The start page of the software has a dropdown menu to select from multiple installed programs/scanners, but it is not straight forward to get there, and the current manual has nothing in there how to correctly install two or more Silverfast 8 versions for different scanners:

      1. Do not install Silverfast 8 from the CD - the versions are not the most actual ones, and you can only run Silverfast 8 for two (or more) scanners with exactly the same updated version. Do not try to install from the CD and do not use the update function within the program at this point - it won't work correctly and will only lead to hiccups with the other version.
      Also, you need to install both Silverfast 8 versions into the same hard drive directory to make them work in parallel.

      2. Download the most actual versions directly form the Silverfast home page. To do this, registration of the software is a requirement. After registration, you need to enter the provided serial number which came with the original CD of the program - do not lose this number! This allows you to get on the Silverfast website with downloadable software versions for the specific program version (for example SE Pro) which was purchased most likely in combination with the scanner. Download the latest version into a directory to install from on the hard drive. Repeat the whole process for the Silverfast version of the second scanner - register it also, enter its serial #, and download again the latest version - it must be the same version code as the first one! - of this specific Silverfast 8 version.

      3. Choose any of the two (or several) downloaded Silverfast 8 programs to be installed in a provided directory. After installation, select the other version to have it installed into the same directory as the earlier installed version. Then start the program with the provided Silverfast 8 desktop link - it will open the start page (assuming the scanner(s) are turned on) and have both scanners in the drop-down list to select from. After selection, the specific version of Silverfast 8 fitting to one of the scanners will start.

      4. Updates in the future. I didn't experience this myself yet, but I asked this question to the support team of Silverfast. Supposedly you can run from now on the internal update function which will now automatically recognize that two (or more) Silverfast versions were installed in the same directory. I was told that there is no need to download the latest upgraded version again directly from the homepage.
    • By duotones
      First, Happy New year.
      within my manual for the M10- on page 172- automatic Bracketing.
      as I look at the picture on that page it Differs then what is on my camera.
      On your M10 do you have within the Drive mode ' exposure bracketing'  an automatic line 'A forth line"
      I have the first three but not the forth line in my M10?
      I'm was trying to do some HDR.
       
      Please advise.
       
       
       
       
       
×
×
  • Create New...