Jump to content

Name this car....


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, NigelG said:

But with hopefully a less maddeningly florid style than LJKS...

His "Long Lane with Turnings" was a rather disappointing book. I would like to acquire a copy of his "The Power to Fly" but they are now fetching silly prices. 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you, UliWer. sorry for the delay - having some work done on the house with contractors swarming all over the place.

This next one should be fairly quick & painless - rare, and fast.

JZG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Wilson - not from south of the alps.

Ronald - getting quite warm. Yes, British - "Maybe even smaller maker" pretty much sums it up. Piper's green is a non-metallic color, whereas this car is more Aston-Martin racing green. 28 cars produced from '65 to '68 with a variety of engines, with a further 50 or so 'kits' being sold, for clients to build and complete their own ideas. A few were even used as road cars.

Below, a further clue, which ought to clinch it.

JZG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Not the correct green for David's cars. I did wonder if it was his P3/4 but the flying buttresses were solid on that. The colour is more Aston-Martin-ish but it is definitely not either one of the Gipfast or Nimrod cars. The bulge in the roof is the sort of thing one would expect to see from Marcos and the colour is the same as the later XP. 

Wilson

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, wlaidlaw said:

It might be a Ginetta G12? 

Wilson

You nailed it, Wilson....it is a Ginetta, a '68 G12.

Wonderful little rockets they are too, predictable, fast, very easy and nice to drive, and a solid selection of proven, top-rated /components to assure long life and reliability.

M240-P / 25mm Summilux FLE

JZG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

This little jewel desrves its own thread - instead, please allow me to feature a short series of images of the car here.

The GRP front body section as well as the rear section are easily removable for servicing - shown here the H20 radiator, Triumph based front suspension, rack & pinion steering. Unless requested otherwise, Minilite wheels were standard. It may look flimsy, but the welded chromemoly tubing steel frame holds the 900 kg car together rigidly and reliably.

JZG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

Side view. The reason the Ford GT-40 was called that is because the night before the unveiling to the press, someone realized that the car had no official name / designation. Since great effort had been expended to make it as low and aerodynamic as possible, it was quickly decided to name it the GT40 since the car , race-ready, was 40 inches tall. I didn't actually measure it, but I'm certain this thing is lower yet.

JZG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

A wide variety of engines could be specified, depending upon what the car was going to be used for, what class it was to compete in and how much HP the owner / driver was prepared to handle. Everything from 1000 cc to 4.7 Shelby-Cobra Fords were offered, but the majority were sold with 1100, 1600 & 2000cc four-cal. motors from Cowworth, BMW, BRM & Lotus. One was delivered with an Aston-Martin Vantage V-8 shoehorned into the rear !

JZG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

........and the final image of this car - the rear view.

Your turn, Wilson.

JZG

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

The Ginetta G12 only fetches about half what its contemporary and quite similar Chevron B8 fetches, why I don't know. The G12 is nicer to drive than the B8. Derek Bennett did not really get the handling of his GT cars sorted until the B16, which is a delight to drive. I will search for a new car today. 

Wilson

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

vor 12 Stunden schrieb John Z. Goriup:

but the welded chromemoly tubing steel frame holds the 900 kg car together rigidly and reliably.

I was wondering where the 900 kg come from. Thought they were MUCH lighter. Massimo Guerra made a "hill climb" G12 with 580 kg (Lotus twin cam) and that I thought is heavy.

Even a street legal Alpine A110 was only 710 kg.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...