Jump to content

Industar 61LD and M8 is INCREDIBLE!!


eleskin

Recommended Posts

Advertisement (gone after registration)

I have many Leica M Mount lenses, including both a 35mm Summicron and 50mm Summicron. I decided to try the famous Industar 61LD just for the hell of it. I paid $19 USD for the lens, and boy what a pleasant surprise! This shot was a studio portrait at around f8.0 1/250. The tonal range and clarity are amazing. Sharpness blows me away, especially for the cheap price! I printed a 17"x22" on my Epson 3800 and the print looks as good as my Summicron!!!

 

WOW!!!

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is a closeup

Welcome, dear visitor! As registered member you'd see an image here…

Simply register for free here – We are always happy to welcome new members!

Link to post
Share on other sites

True enough that the big bucks go to the wider f stop lens sharpness (not the Noctilux which I have. The Noct "look" is more important than sharpness). I agree that the Leica glass is sharper wide open in most cases. This lens is cool not so much because it is reasonably sharp at f2.8 and very sharp after f5.6 as expected, but because it does so well being a very very cheap lens. Most lenses for M Leicas are very expensive, and it is nice to see something that is very usable at a cheap price. For me, this is experimentation and fascination with the Russian efforts at producing photographic tools. The fact that they copied off of German designs is even more interesting, and in some cases, the Russians improved the German designs. Another very important issue is most of these older lenses, Russian included, are not quite as contrasty as newer designs, making them a wonderful tool for Black and White work. I feel they actually give a greater tonal range and more gentile transition from shadow to highlight, especially with modern digital sensors (M8/M9).

 

Another nice thing here is these cheap but usable lenses offer one affordable backup lenses in case of disaster. For me, Leica glass is not cheap. Yes, I have some focal lengths in more than one version (I have the 50mm Summicron and Noctilux), but generally, I have one of each focal length due to cost. All of my lenses, both Leica and Russian are used. My Voigtlander 15mm Super Wide Heliar and 40mm Nokton were bought new, but were reasonably priced for new.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I may also add that the excellent quality of the sample I posted here also has much to do with how good the sensor really is on the M8 (and on the M9). It is proof that Leica and Kodak know what they are doing despite all of the criticism in the photo world dominated by Japanese technology.

 

The Japanese at their best are at the top of the heap, but Kodak and Leica have shown us all what can still be done by the companies that were responsible for making photography popular for many people in the world that previously did not use a camera (due to the use of large cameras and tripods, glass plates, etc,,,).

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
So what kind of adaptor do you need for it to work on the M?

 

Sorry for the slight hijack..

 

I'd be interested to know this too.

 

I'm thinking this is a cheap way to get a lens to use, whilst i save up for some Leica glass. ;)

 

Be awful to have the M8 and not be able to use it :eek:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry for the slight hijack..

 

I'd be interested to know this too.

 

I'm thinking this is a cheap way to get a lens to use, whilst i save up for some Leica glass. ;)

 

Be awful to have the M8 and not be able to use it :eek:

 

 

You need a LTM to M mount adapter, there are many different ones available from Leica, Voigtlander, Rayqual etc etc and of course the cheaper Chinese ones to be found on ebay.

The Chinese ones can be of dubious quality, it's down to luck of the draw with them.

You do need to be aware that to code lenses you need the type that are full circle, not those with a wasted cutout in them. The Voigtlander V2's have the full circle style though some other manufacturers do have similar in their ranges check this when buying if you want to code the lens.

The cost of a decent mount will be about same cost as one of these lenses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I've owned one of these little, radioactive Russians for several years, though it's only ever done duty on my R-D1 and not my M8

 

On this camera it's about an 82mm equiv. focal length; great for for portraits, of course. The images it has delivered are quite lovely and, yes, sharp. However, close in and at wide aperture settings I can't rely on the Industar. It is obvious that, at least my example, focuses behind my chosen focus point. I've been told by a service person that this can be cured with the lens/camera body combination adjusted using, as I recall, a collimator. This is an investment I find much to costly to make in a lens that came as the body cap on a FED 5 I once owned. ;)

That said, I enjoy the lens and won't sell it but I have to regard it as a toy,

not a tool to be relied upon.

 

Best regards to all on the Forum

 

Sam

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 7 months later...

I think I have one of those attached to my old FED 4 camera. The lens has N-61 2,8/52 written on it, the N is written backwards and it is a bit worn. I've ordered an adaptor to try it out.

 

3494787482_ac1ef655fa.jpg

 

Karl.

Edited by karl101
Link to post
Share on other sites

Hello,

could you expound on why it's known as a radioactive lens?

Was it:

Built in a Chernobyl Shed? ;-)

Made with Radium to give your images a Leica-Like 'Glow'! Hee Hee

Outfitted with Uranium Batteries? :-p

R. in Mi.

I understand the Industar 61LD is radioactive too! Even more bang for your buck! ;)
Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually Thorium's radioactivity is extremely low.

In nature, thorium is found as thorium-232 only, and Thorium 232 decays very slowly by emitting an alpha particle. The half-life of thorium-232 is about 14.05 billion years.

So no real issue technically (but probably bad for the publicity....)

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, I prefer my false answers... they're funnier! Although it would probably cut down on the chance of an equipment theft if I plaster Radioactivity Warning Labels on my Camera Bag. :-)

No - Thorium was used in some of the lens elements to improve the quality of the optical glass.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...