minibus Posted February 13, 2010 Share #1 Posted February 13, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Please comment. thx a lot!!! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted February 13, 2010 Posted February 13, 2010 Hi minibus, Take a look here Which 35mm lens is the best for M?. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
earleygallery Posted February 13, 2010 Share #2 Posted February 13, 2010 Best as in how? Price, size, high or low contrast, speed.........? Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
GMB Posted February 13, 2010 Share #3 Posted February 13, 2010 Mine.... Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
minibus Posted February 13, 2010 Author Share #4 Posted February 13, 2010 I mean photo quality, thx! Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Box Brownie Posted February 13, 2010 Share #5 Posted February 13, 2010 Interesting comparison of 35mm Leica M lenses here... Although the cheapest, it seems there is a strong case for the Summarit over its more glamorous cousins.. The Leica 35 Summarit Lens Review | STEVE HUFF PHOTOS Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philippe D. Posted February 13, 2010 Share #6 Posted February 13, 2010 "Which 35mm lens is the best for M?" The last one! That is, the coming Summilux one. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peyton Hoge Posted February 13, 2010 Share #7 Posted February 13, 2010 Advertisement (gone after registration) Please comment. thx a lot!!! All of them Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
earleygallery Posted February 13, 2010 Share #8 Posted February 13, 2010 'Photo quality' is too subjective. Some people like the quality of older lenses for example. I have a Voigtlander Skopar on my M2. It's excellent quality and one of the less expensive options available. It's also a small and light lens. Nothing to fault. The lens I'd like to buy is the Summicron asph, which is a legendary lens (but high contrast so could be too much on an M9 in harsh lighting). 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
microview Posted February 14, 2010 Share #9 Posted February 14, 2010 Interesting comparison of 35mm Leica M lenses here... Although the cheapest, it seems there is a strong case for the Summarit over its more glamorous cousins.. The Leica 35 Summarit Lens Review | STEVE HUFF PHOTOS Ken Rockwell: "I wouldn't buy one of these. For less money you can get a used 35mm SUMMICRON lens of whatever vintage you like, including the current ASPH, or get a 1960's SUMMARON f/2.8 which ought to do about the same thing for a whole lot less.":D 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaapv Posted February 14, 2010 Share #10 Posted February 14, 2010 'Photo quality' is too subjective. Some people like the quality of older lenses for example. I have a Voigtlander Skopar on my M2. It's excellent quality and one of the less expensive options available. It's also a small and light lens. Nothing to fault. The lens I'd like to buy is the Summicron asph, which is a legendary lens (but high contrast so could be too much on an M9 in harsh lighting). I have them both. The Summicron asph holds the highlights far better than the Color Skopar. (nice little lens though, great value for money) I think the Suummicron 35 asph is simply the best 35 for general photography. Period. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonoslack Posted February 14, 2010 Share #11 Posted February 14, 2010 Hi There Well, if you really need the fast aperture, then the 35 1.4 summilux is a no-brainer . . but it's expensive, and the current model suffers from focus shift . . . all the rumours suggest a newer model with a moving element some time. If you don't need the speed, then I can only speak of the current summicron asph and the lowly summarit. I've had both of them, but I liked the summarit so much better that I sold the summicron - of course, it's a matter of taste, but I found the cheaper summarit to be a little gentler in it's drawing, and it's a tiny lens and lovely to use. heplful? probably not, but you did ask! 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeff S Posted February 14, 2010 Share #12 Posted February 14, 2010 A fond remembrance, given Jaap's recommendation... A couple of decades ago when I bought my first M, I asked the elderly Hungarian owner of the small Leica shop in my area (east US)... about the best lens(es) to buy. He was a lifelong Leica (and Rollei) user. I had come prepared, reading up on all I could get my hands on. No matter my comments or questions, all he would utter...in his very thick accent...was "Summicron." Well, what about 28 vs 35 vs 50 vs 90, I asked. "Summicron." But, I read that....(multiple comments). "Summicron." But, don't you think... "Summicron." Then he narrowed it down..."35 Summicron start." I bought a 35 Summicron. Since then I've added and changed lenses, venturing into Summiluxes, etc. But, I've never forgotten his voice, or his admonition. And, I've never gone without the 35 Summicron in my arsenal. Although I have changed some versions here and there...now using the asph. Jeff 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
asparis Posted March 10, 2010 Share #13 Posted March 10, 2010 For black and white, and/or indoors: 1990's non-ASPH Summicron. For color and outdoors: 1950's Summaron (the later, f2.8 one) (I've owned the ASPH one. Didn't like it. Sold it.) De gustibus non est disputandum Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leicaiste Posted March 10, 2010 Share #14 Posted March 10, 2010 From wide open ? The 35/2 Summicron Asph. Lucien 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
dseelig Posted March 10, 2010 Share #15 Posted March 10, 2010 According to diglloyd a pid site the 35 f 2 Zeiss m. If you need low light a 35 lux asph chrome and titanuim seem to have less focus shift. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thrice Posted March 10, 2010 Share #16 Posted March 10, 2010 According to diglloyd a pid site the 35 f 2 Zeiss m. If you need low light a 35 lux asph chrome and titanuim seem to have less focus shift. I've always wondered why I never saw it on my chrome lux asph. I did a test and could only *just* see a little softening at MFD on the intended plane of focus at about 2.8 (compared to 2.0 and 4.0) all other apertures appeared equally sharp in the plane of focus. Here are my test shots, I handheld all of these and think I may have misfocused ever so slightly on the f/5.6 shot, if I did a controlled test with a tripod I assume they would all be even closer. whole shot f/1.4 crop f/2.0 crop f/2.8 crop f/4.0 crop f/5.6 crop If people hadn't told me about the supposed focus shift with the 35 lux asph, there's a snowball's chance in hell I'd ever have noticed it. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jose_Salcedo Posted March 11, 2010 Share #17 Posted March 11, 2010 I would definitely recommend the 35/2 Summicron Asph. It is stunningly sharp, has great contrast and a beautiful out of focus rendering. Keep in mind that a new 35 Summilux is about to come out, and that it will certainly be an outstanding lens, designed along the lines of the newer Summilux lens principles. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
innerimager Posted March 11, 2010 Share #18 Posted March 11, 2010 Please know there are many black versions of the 35/1.4 asph that do not have significant focus shift. I'm happy to say I own one, and it is my most use lens on the M9. The focus shift that is measurable using fine ruler testing between 1.4 and 4 is absolutely too small to ever render any shot I've taken at any aperture out of focus. (It's so small that the increaed depth of field stopping down covers the shift handily). I'm pretty sure that most 35/1.4 asph lenses are like mine, but for sure there are enough with larger shift effecting image quality that you should plan on testing one you buy and have a return policy. Once you have one like mine, you'll see it's worth the trouble. Now, if the new version reported to be coming solves this for all samples, great, and if it draws in some way that people like it "more" than the current version, even better, but I can't see giving mine up, it's just that good.....Peter 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
pack_tor Posted March 11, 2010 Share #19 Posted March 11, 2010 Please know there are many black versions of the 35/1.4 asph that do not have significant focus shift. I'm happy to say I own one, and it is my most use lens on the M9. Now, if the new version reported to be coming solves this for all samples, great, and if it draws in some way that people like it "more" than the current version, even better, but I can't see giving mine up, it's just that good.....Peter Exactly the same experience with mine. Most used lens on M9. If there's a focus-shift, let's say I haven't seen it. I can't see myself giving it up even if the rumored new one shows theoretical improvements. If you can afford it and all the talk of focus shift makes you nervous, I'd recommend you buy it from someone who you can return easily. But, do try it out if you can afford it. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
novice9 Posted March 11, 2010 Share #20 Posted March 11, 2010 ditto. i love my 35 1.4 asph. Quote Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.