Guest guy_mancuso Posted December 10, 2006 Share #201 Â Posted December 10, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) Thanks well I am at the airport on my way home and everyone has left to go to there homes also. It was a fun weekend and we enjoyed sharing it here. My final thoughts are I was very pleased with my results from the M8 it functions very nicely but i am looking forward to the updated firmware both camera's had 1.06 and i am also looking forward to some better profiles. It is not perfect yet and given my experience from the DMR when it gets to the DMR standards than i will consider it perfect until than we will press on . Enjoy the day and get out and have some fun. Thanks for looking and sharing. Â Guy Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Advertisement Posted December 10, 2006 Posted December 10, 2006 Hi Guest guy_mancuso, Take a look here Yosemite M8 trip. I'm sure you'll find what you were looking for!
sean_reid Posted December 10, 2006 Share #202  Posted December 10, 2006 Yes Allan one more day of fun and back to our boring lifes. LOL I am falling in love with the 50 lux barely have taken it off 1.4 there is one in here the one with the solo leaf is the CV 15mm  I love that lens too...also the 35/1.4  Have fun,  Sean Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_reid Posted December 10, 2006 Share #203  Posted December 10, 2006 DO NOT SELL THE LUX. It has the tab focus , hood that stays open and focuses extremely fast and at 1.4 i have not seen much better than this lens. The Nocti is really nice but i will not be giving the Lux up for it. look at the bokeh Cindy it is really nice, maybe not as smooth but still extremely good. Plus the size and weight do go to the Lux . really i don't think having just the Nocti is the answer , either both or the lux only. It just does more  Cindy,  When Guy was shopping for 50s I gave him the same advice that he is now giving you. The Noctilux is a wonderful and special lens but I find the 1.4 to be the more versatile lens: smaller (blocks less of the frame line area), faster to focus, etc.  Cheers,  Sean Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest magyarman Posted December 10, 2006 Share #204 Â Posted December 10, 2006 I do not see something which make me take M8 above 5D. 5D is cost half money, also no filters need to buy and looks like red light from front to catch people by theyre eye . Right now M8 is good, ok but not enough differents. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_reid Posted December 10, 2006 Share #205  Posted December 10, 2006 Guy I agree with you about raw developer but you may also want to use C1 with the JFI profiles Sean recommends. I found them to be awesome and for the $16 they charge a real bargain. Whoops, just did a test and the JFI profiles work perfectly in Raw Developer as well.  Woody Spedden  They just expanded the profile set as well. They sent some new one's designed to emulate various films in RAW conversion (as some other products do in post).  Cheers,  Sean Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
rvaubel Posted December 10, 2006 Share #206  Posted December 10, 2006 I do not see something which make me take M8 above 5D. 5D is cost half money, also no filters need to buy and looks like red light from front to catch people by theyre eye . Right now M8 is good, ok but not enough differents.  "...ok but not enough differents.." ? I'd say about, for a kit, at least 5 lbs and a sore back  Rex Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_reid Posted December 10, 2006 Share #207 Â Posted December 10, 2006 Advertisement (gone after registration) I do not see something which make me take M8 above 5D. 5D is cost half money, also no filters need to buy and looks like red light from front to catch people by theyre eye . Right now M8 is good, ok but not enough differents. Â Well then, you've just saved yourself a lot of money. That's good. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest magyarman Posted December 10, 2006 Share #208 Â Posted December 10, 2006 5D weigth mabe 300g more then M8. Take with same lenses Leica ( 2.8/28mm, 2/35mm, 2/50mm, 2/90mm) and Canon (EF2.8/28mm, EF2.0/35mm, EF1.8/50mm,EF 1.8/85mm), Canon going to weigth less! If you thinking Canon 5D and 2-3 f/2.8 zoomlenses than OK, you going to get sore back, but also you have much more focals. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted December 10, 2006 Share #209 Â Posted December 10, 2006 I agree buy the 5D than. This leaves more available to the folks that actually know the difference and really want the M8 for what it is. I am going home with 9 lenses and 2 body's in a bag that is like the size of a 4 slice toaster. My back feels great. LOL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter41951 Posted December 10, 2006 Share #210 Â Posted December 10, 2006 Many thanks to all Yosemite travellers for all the news and photographs; I look forward to seeing more tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest magyarman Posted December 10, 2006 Share #211 Â Posted December 10, 2006 Well then, you've just saved yourself a lot of money. That's good. Â I am fine to spend money, I have 1DS-MKII which costed more then M8. Bat I got with that money something which I can see why my money has gone. Spend double just to show I can spend and I have got a Leica about my neck, this to me is what means to waste money not to spend him, sorry. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
marknorton Posted December 10, 2006 Share #212 Â Posted December 10, 2006 Hey, Blasko, you can make the same point over and over and over but it doesn't change anything. I hope you enjoy your Canon, if you don't want to buy an M8, that's just fine because there are lots of people who do. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cindy Flood Posted December 10, 2006 Share #213  Posted December 10, 2006 Cindy, When Guy was shopping for 50s I gave him the same advice that he is now giving you. The Noctilux is a wonderful and special lens but I find the 1.4 to be the more versatile lens: smaller (blocks less of the frame line area), faster to focus, etc.  Cheers,  Sean Sean, I have a 50 Summilux pre-ASPH. Do you think it is worth the money to upgrade to the ASPH? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidf1 Posted December 11, 2006 Share #214 Â Posted December 11, 2006 I've been reading for a month now on the prod and cons of the M8 and at times its gets tiring. I must say this Yosemite thread has been fantastic, even with the one or two hi-jacks that have taken place. The pictures are fantastic, it's fun to put faces to posts, and it's great to see a bunch of guys having fun with their hobby and profession. Â Thanks, I've really enjoyed this thread. Â david Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsteve Posted December 11, 2006 Author Share #215 Â Posted December 11, 2006 Jack had us in a great place. Sometimes we didn't even have to get out of the truck to shoot, as evident by the shadow. Â Â Here I am not sure if it is Guy fearing the UV-IR hair tonic treatment or the smell of the the cows. Â Â Here Jack and Mike wait in the truck while Guy and I get out to shoot. Â Â The next day Mike and I are back in Yosemite Valley. I snap this handheld with the M8 while showing it to a fellow photo enthusiast from New Zealand. Â Â All of the above images were taken with the M8 and UV-IR filters were on the lenses. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
osera Posted December 11, 2006 Share #216 Â Posted December 11, 2006 I am fine to spend money, I have 1DS-MKII which costed more then M8. Bat I got with that money something which I can see why my money has gone. Spend double just to show I can spend and I have got a Leica about my neck, this to me is what means to waste money not to spend him, sorry. Â Here's my only 5D/M8 comparison comment- When I went out in public with the 5D and great glass compared to when I went out in public with the M8 and great glass... which one do you think got more attention? Which one got more comments? Which one seemed more "impressive" to people? Yup, the 5D. of course. I've only come across one person who said anything about the M8 being anything other than a P&S. So no one is impressed, no one cares. Would you be impressed? I think not. So I'm not getting the "just to show" part. Show who? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cindy Flood Posted December 11, 2006 Share #217 Â Posted December 11, 2006 This thread has been so much fun to read. It is refreshing to get to actually view good M8 photos from photographers actually using the camera. Thanks Guy, Robert and Jack for letting us share your adventure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsteve Posted December 11, 2006 Author Share #218 Â Posted December 11, 2006 Here is a picture that was on my SD card but I didn't take. Rob Martin, a Fred Miranda forum member ran into Mike Hatam and I on the Yosemite Valley floor. He and his girlfriend joined us for lunch at the hotel. Rob snapped this of his girlfriend using the 24mm ASPH, f2,8 and 1/30th of a second. Looks like he caught on to rangefinder focusing quite fast. Â Â When we bumped into him, he was using a Hasselblad H1 with a digital back and noticed my DMR. When I told him it was a Leica, he brought up the new M8. I told him I had one in my waiste pouch and if he had his own SD cards, he was welcome to shoot it a bit. Rob took a few minutes shooting the M8 and I think he was quite impressed with it. When we ran into him at the next stop, we invited them to join us for lunch. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guy_mancuso Posted December 11, 2006 Share #219 Â Posted December 11, 2006 Did not tell us about this . Jack and i were off shooting real photos. LOL Â Sitting down to a real lunch , you should be ashamed . Â Now the color looks great there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
robsteve Posted December 11, 2006 Author Share #220  Posted December 11, 2006  Now the color looks great there  I just used the WB tool and selected the plate to get a WB. It was good light from the windows and Rob Martin did a good job with the composition. I forgot to mention it was 320iso and auto exposure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.