I've read several threads about the Leica CL vs the Q, yet I've yet to see anyone highlight what happens on the used market with these cameras. The Q is an older camera yet blows the CL out of the water in terms of appeal. You don't believe me? Scan Ebay auctions over the next few weeks and see how many Leica Qs sell vs the Leica CL. I nearly bought a CL with the 18-56mm kit lens. I'm glad I didn't. This is clear that I'd take a beating on resale in case I didn't like it. I know some users love the CL and I respect this, but I wouldn't believe anyone who claimed that the CL has anywhere close to the level of respect and appeal as the Q in the resale market. Am I missing something? Maybe Q owners are simply more realistic. This is common to find a Leica Q listed in an auction format with a low opening price. This is rare to see the CL listed at a low starting price in auction format.