Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'positive'.
Found 2 results
-
I am successfully developing at home C-41 color negative (and XP2 B&W) and E-6 based slide films using the Arista development packs. After I started recently working with the E-6 process, a few differences compared to C-41 became obvious to me regarding the recommended steps in the development procedures: 1. E-6 requires washing with water between first developer and color developer, and then afterwards before adding Blix. C-41 has no water wash in between developer and Blix addition - why? Would it be better to add a washing step in the C-41 process similar to the E-6 process to avoid contamination of Blix and stop the developer? Or is there a reason that this shouldn't be done? 2. E-6 has no final stabilizer wash as it is done in the C-41 process. I understood from earlier discussions in this forum that the stabilizer acts to preserve the color negative - any specific reason why this is not needed with slide film? 3. Is there a difference in oxidation stability of the developer used in C-41 and the two developers used in E-6? Are both color developers in C-41 and E-6 the same?
-
Hallo Forum, ich bin auf der Suche nach einer Alternative zu dem Photoshop Plugin ColorPerfect, dass gescannte Farbnegative(in meinem Fall lineare tiff's, die roh Daten aus einem ProScan 7200) in positive umwandelt. Das Plugin ermöglicht die Umwandlung für fast jeden Filmtyp usw... Bisher mache ich das mit Lightroom und Ps was bei größeren Mengen wirklich umständlich ist, nicht immer das von mir Gewünschtes Ergebnis liefert und ne Menge Handarbeit erfordert. Deshalb meine Frage: Gibt es Alternativen? Wenn nicht, habt ihr Tipps wie man den Workflow von negativ zu positiv- schneller und qualitativ besser optimieren kann? Habe schon ein Wenig im English sprachigen Leica Forum gelesen... die scheinen aber alle auf ColorPerfect zu schwören (Oder eben Handarbeit...) Danke im Voraus!
