Dear all,
I am the happy owner of a M(240), and more recently a CL and SL.
I am coming from over 15 years of film M.
I like shooting the rangefinder camera though I find a huge difference between my almost 5 year old M and the most recent (for me: I got the CL last january and the SL in October) cameras in image quality as soon as I shoot over iso 1600.
I almost never shoot the M in color over iso 1600 since I don’t like what I can get out of lightroom @iso 2500 or more in color.
i also have trouble with color consistency in mixed (daylight + artificial) lighting with the M.
on both issues I find the SL is far superior and even the CL.
Do you share the same experience ?
do you think the M10 is much better in those areas ?
thanks for sharing your experience
didier