The 40Mp Monochrome does not have image stabilization which both the Q2 and SL2 have.
Initial reviews of high-res sensors suggested that a tripod or image stabilization would be necessary to get the benefits of 40-60Mp 35mm-sized sensors.
Anyone actually using the above cameras done any objective comparisons?
Sure, the reviews testing resolution show a difference, but the cameras are tripod-mounted under controlled conditions.
Walking around with hand-held shooting, as the M is best known for, is increasing the Mp's without image stabilization going to achieve any practical benefit?
Does the color filter play a role?