Jump to content

Timkr

Members
  • Posts

    121
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Member Title
    Neuer Benutzer

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Here’s a link to my pics from my trip using SL and SL lenses https://www.smugmug.com/gallery/n-XgxPQ5
  2. I did falklands, sour Georgia and antarctica with an SL and 90-280, 24-90 and it worked out beautifully. Only a couple of times that I felt I need more length but, with SL2, won’t be a problem. You’ll be close to all the wildlife and the iq from that setup is hard to beat. Enjoy
  3. Read your post, you make no sense. Only a pro who wants to sell pics needs sharp images? an amateur has no use for high FPS? Maybe stop telling people what they need and don’t need
  4. That may be the dumbest thing I’ve read. As an amateur photographer who shoots mainly wildlife and grandchildren, getting as many shots in focus is the best way the capture that memorable moment. I would agree with you if I were puttering around the garden shooting flowers.
  5. This thread is full of opinions, mostly biased, being passed off as fact. I have no doubt you found ‘articles’ that support one opinion or another. The fact is both the Sony a1 and leica SL2 are great cameras, and one may be better than the other in a given scenario. I just want a firmware upgrade to bring the SL2 to a level equal to the Lumix S1. The rest of this is noise.
  6. I get 30 FPS with 50 MP all day long with gm lenses. You are entitled to your opinions but not your own facts
  7. I’ve had just about every leica body since the m8 and Sony since the a7. Instead of behaving like a child, why share your experience to support your opinions?
  8. So, you don’t have any data to share. Figured
  9. Totally disagree with you. I’m sure you have data to support this or, are you just spouting off?
  10. Ktsa5239 Good for you, we obviously have very different expectations
×
×
  • Create New...