Jump to content

malcolm

Members
  • Posts

    177
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Profile Information

  • Member Title
    Erfahrener Benutzer
  1. From the rear fins/rudders and the strut suspension for the wheels, some kind of aerocar?
  2. My customary 2-lens travel kit is comprised of 28 and 75 'crons; find this works well for me. These on an M9. If considering an M8-equivalent crop factor and the M9 "full frame", this works out to effective FOV's of 28, 35, 75, and 90.
  3. Very well done portraits; I particularly like the one of Scott Pruett (eventual co-winner in DP).
  4. Camera That Snapped Picasso Goes For $2.19 Million, Becomes World's Most Expensive (SLIDESHOW)
  5. I downloaded and installed 6.4.2 today. Am using Snow Leopard OS, which works fine. Cannot comment on Snow Lion usage.
  6. malcolm

    Man with M2

    Larry, The "toning" on the M2 body looks more titanium than the lighter tones in the rest of the b&w image. Was this deliberate, or are my old eyes deceiving me?
  7. Poas volcano, Costa Rica M9, 28 'cron, SilverEfexPro2.0
  8. Michael, Your image brings back memories of the 2 Zone VI workshops I attended in the late '70s and early '80s. If I remember correctly, the camera around Fred's neck was an M2 with 35mm lens - which he used primarily for moving subjects; he also used a Nikon F with 105 lens for portraits.
  9. See also this thread: Leica 12589 vs 12466 replacement hood for 35 Lux ASPH old
  10. Assuming you do NOT wear glasses, in which case even the framelines for 28 mm may be difficult to see at one glance - and may require some slight horizontal shifting of eye position to see the full 28mm field of view.
  11. I recently ordered a 12466 hood for use with a 28 'cron, and UliWer asked me to post any additional thoughts or impressions I might have. I received the 12466 hood today, and following are my impressions: The hood is very/ridiculously/absurdly expensive (pick one) - even by Leica standards - and certainly will not be for everyone; It does not vignette the image at all on an M9 (I assume the same will be true for M film bodies); It does vignette noticeably (but not substantially) less on the viewfinder than the stock 12451 hood. Below are a few photos, showing: Front of camera with 12451 hood and 28 'cron lens focussed at infinity; Front of camera with 12451 hood and 28 'cron lens focussed 0.7 meters; Front of camera with 12466 hood and 28 'cron lens focussed at infinity; Front of camera with 12466 hood and 28 'cron lens focussed at 0.7 meters; Viewfinder (partial view) showing intrusion of 12451 hood relative to 90mm frame; and Viewfinder (partial view) showing intrusion of 12466 hood relative to 90mm frame.
  12. Ronald beat me to a reply. Additional information: I think this a Datsun 1600 Roadster.
  13. UliWer, Thanks. Just the information I was looking for.
×
×
  • Create New...